- Joined
- 29 August 2006
- Posts
- 909
- Reactions
- 148
Here are some updated factoids summarized from the data:
Over 1970 to 2012 the globe averaged about 15 TC landfalls per year (Category 1-5)
Of those 15, about 5 are intense (Category 3, 4 or 5)
1971 had the most global landfalls with 30, far exceeding the second place, 25 in 1996
1978 had the fewest with 7
2011 tied for second place for the fewest global landfalls with 10 (and 3 were intense, tying 1973, 1981 and 2002)
Five years share the most intense TC landfalls with 9, most recently 2008.
1981 had the fewest intense TC landfalls with zero
The US is currently in the midst of the longest streak ever recorded without an intense hurricane landfall
The past 4 years have seen 12 major landfalling hurricanes, very low but not unprecedented -- 1984-1987 had just 11. The most is 35 (2005-2008).
The past 4 years have seen 51 total landfalling hurricanes, on the low end -- the least is 41 (1978-1981) and the most is 80 (four periods, most recently 2004-2007).
There have been frequent four-year periods with more than 25 landfalling major hurricanes, or more than a 100% increase of what has been observed over the past 4 years.
Anyone who'd like to argue that the world is experiencing a "new normal" with respect to tropical cyclones is simply mistaken. Over the past 4 years, the world is actually in the midst of a very low period in tropical cyclone landfalls -- at least as measured over the past 43 years.
umm Hurricane Sandy was not long ago and I remember that, I dont remember any of those other ones, therefore it is getting worse!!!
We'll never know, because the Mayan/basilio calendar predicts the world will come to an end on 21 December. They haven't told us the mechanism, but my guess is that the Earth will be gobbled up by a black hole.
It's time to crack a case of Grange Hermitage 1985. (buy it on credit card at $9597 a dozen.)
Greenland...why is it named thus.
My information is because it was ancient land scam.Erik the Red after being banned from Iceland took some followers to a new land that he named Greenland.He did this in order to entice new settlers there,not because it was a verdant paradise.
The same would apply if real estate people were trying to entice people to the Simpson desert by naming it Simpson Waters.
It is only Global warming when the media reports extreme temperatures and the alarmist jump on the band wagon.
It was 0.3 c in Canberra this morning and not a word mentioned by the Alarmist. I wonder why?
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/...ldsun/comments/its_only_climate_when_its_hot/
I can see how the concept of a round world was so hard to promulgate.It still looks flat to me.
The second episode in the Climate Wars looks at the role of climate change skeptics in challenging the work of cliamte scientists.
Amazingly it finishes with Professor Michaels acknowledging that the world has warmed in the 20th Century and that humans are partially responsible. !!
Again worth a look.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_1wAQJi_YU
... The argument ([SIGH] once again), is whether human's influence will be catastrophic ...
Or more exactly .... will human influence make it catastrophic.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?