- Joined
- 23 November 2004
- Posts
- 3,974
- Reactions
- 851
Great post. Agree 100%
Far out, 159 pages of dribble.
Lets make is simple so kiddies can understand.
Is Global Warming unstoppable?
- A. YES - prove it, you need time (100's of years)
- B. NO - prove it, you need time (100's of years)
So unless someone has a couple of earths to test theories on, as that what they are, modelling is just a theory and a time machine, no one can within any % of accuracy answer the question within the next 100 years.
So lets look at again.
Is the earth warming?
- Yes/Maybe/No. The earth temperature and sea levels have been constantly changing.
So lets just agree the the climate is changing. Tick
So next question.
Has man contributed to the changes, ie accelerated them?
So while all you kiddies and the stupid arse govnuts want to point figures there is such a simple solution that doesn't require huge debate.
- Well I am no scientist but again will use kiddie logic to see if there is a simple answer.
- What do trees do? They provide oxygen and capture carbon out of the air. They are essentially the earths lungs, without them, all life on the planet is f---ked.
- What has man done over the last say 100 years, removed 50% > of the earth capacity to breath.
- And in the same time man has dug up oil and coal and burnt is, releasing carbon in various forms back into the atmosphere. Again, I don't need to get into a discussion whether co2 is causing climate change.
- And what do we know about forest, they also create weather, including rain fall.
PLANT MORE F---KING TREES, LOTS AND LOTS AND LOTS MORE
And if our govnuts want to continue to promote coal, then fine, just make the miners and produces plant TREES.
And if that doesn't provide an adequate solution to the problem, I have one more suggestion.
KILLS THE PARASITES THAT ARE DISTROYING THE PLANET - HUMANS
I thought it showed a complete misunderstanding of the scientific method to create a simplistic statement that let the polluters off the hook.Great post. Agree 100%
Climate change is no longer (if it ever was) scientific - it's political.I thought it showed a complete misunderstanding of the scientific method to create a simplistic statement that let the polluters off the hook.
Go and fight the bushfires and come back to us on that thought.Climate change is no longer (if it ever was) scientific - it's political.
Climate change is no longer (if it ever was) scientific - it's political.
Catchy tune. I use to watch Cook and Moore on TV - very funny.24 seconds of Derick and Clive (aka Cook and Moore) on You Tube... To lift the mood.
Just google 'Derick and Clive Dutch'
Harsh Dutchie?? well maybe, but you've set yourself up for it.
Despite you being a curmudgeon, I did give you credit for a modicum of critical thinking skills, even if completely polluted by politics.Go and fight the bushfires and come back to us on that thought.
Interesting article in the weekend AFR today, we can get to zero emissions, it is a good read for those interested.
https://www.afr.com/policy/energy-a...-expensive-but-not-impossible-20200116-p53s7d
Saul Griffiths analysis on Mass electrification and Decarbonisation of the US economy.
The Green New Deal: The enormous opportunity in shooting for the moon.
Decarbonizing with massive electrification will bring about a new American abundance.
I think blaming the bushfires primarily on CC is a load of bull. The whole thing was hijacked by the CC mob.Interesting:
Washington: James Murdoch has accused his family's global media empire of promoting climate denialism in a stunning attack on News Corporation's climate coverage.
The comments represent a rare public dispute among members of the Murdoch family about News Corp's editorial direction.
Rupert Murdoch flanked by sons Lachlan (left) and James. Creditoug Peters
They come as the bushfire crisis ravaging Australia has focused attention on the climate coverage in News Corp mastheads such as The Australian, The Daily Telegraph and the Herald Sun.
“Kathryn and James’ views on climate are well established and their frustration with some of the News Corp and Fox coverage of the topic is also well known,” a spokesperson for Murdoch and his wife told The Daily Beast website.
"They are particularly disappointed with the ongoing denial among the news outlets in Australia given obvious evidence to the contrary.”
We had the 8 average hottest days in recorded history for Australia over the last two months.I think blaming the bushfires primarily on CC is a load of bull. The whole thing was hijacked by the CC mob.
Since the method of taking temperature has changed which is what?We had the 8 average hottest days in recorded history for Australia over the last two months.
Of the other two days of recorded history heat records, one was broken the previous year.
You can't say the heat is irrelevant with relation to bushfire intensity.
The truth is the hijacking is the truth by the Newscorp press.
That press will say we should not talk about the elephant in the room while the bushfires are occurring and anyway it's the Greens fault.
In the UK they represent the opposite side and supported the Tory climate change action which included shutting down the unionised coal mines.
Quite frankly, we are not that dumb as a country to fall for the two card trick and I think the Murdoch press will begin modifying their stance.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?