Hi All,
I am curious if there is anybody consistently losing some significant amount of money.
I am not talking about losing the pips that represent the fee, I am talking about something significantly more.
Nick
https://www.aussiestockforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=28356
Why don't you scan the 'Forex' forum.....oh look, here's the same question 3 threads down.
pinkboy
So is your question directed at those who haven't had to work hard for their money, who are practice 'madness' repeating the same mistakes over and over again, simply blowing their maybe, inherited or easy come by cash?
How are you going to exit ?
Most people lose a lot because they move their stop/overleverage. Are you going to do the opposite, underleverage and not take profit ? Or are you going to take the same position size, overleverage, and not take profit ?
Most that follow their system and risk sensibly 0.5-1%per trade are going to chop around breakeven to negative skewed because of spread. You're going to have to overcome the spread which is an uphill battle.
Also when you tell someone you're going to follow their signals and do the opposite, their psychology changes which changes their trading behaviour. Maybe they will just spew out random trades to please you as they are going to receive your compensation anyway ? Are they going to demo trade and not put live money on - we all know demo traders are more profitable, are you going to reverse their profitable demo trades ?
Ok, I think I follow. There is unfinished news business from last week, but....
Go short EURUSD tomorrow on open and close it 24hrs later. Like normal trading the 24hrs could extend out to 48hrs to lose even more, if that's the goal.
Go short GBPUSD tomorrow on open and close it 24hrs later. Ditto above.
Like consistent losing positions, they let losers run, so giving exact closing times would not be consistent with consistent losers, hence a window to maximise losses.
I could probably throw some others into the mix, but I think some would take it too seriously.
Good points Minwa.
THIS IS NOT TRADING ADVICE! This reply is merely in humour to the initial posting. I would not even trade the inverse of the above.
It won't work. The results will be like the double slit experiment. Things change when "observed".
No one is going to tell you a specific trade as to follow the 'never give financial advice' rule of the forum, and the same rule for general outside the forum as if you're not qualified to give advice you could be sued.
pinkboy
Do you plan on being on the other end of their trade or something? Taking a short on their long, and visa-versa?
I agree with that. So, why not pairing with somebody who loses money and do the opposite?Given that forex is a zero sum game from the perspective of traders (actually a negative sum once you take spreads into account), if someone is making a profit then someone else must be losing money.
If over 90% of the people lose money in the market (more than the spread), then clearly it should be a way to act the opposite way than the crowd and make a bit of money. It is true that spreads represent a significant portion of the loss, but somehow I believe there are many people losing much more than just the spread.
Nick
Menkhoff L, Sarno L and Schmeling A, 2012, "The Cross-Section of Currency Order Flow", Working Paper
...examined tick level data and found that professional fund managers and currency trading hedge funds took money out of the market in aggregate. There are relatively few of these. The losers were Private Client and retail, and also the hedgers...in aggregate. There are relatively many of these. Hence a massive failure rate and the profit accrues to the few.
Basically, to win systematically in FX as a retail punter, you are going to have to emulate George Costanza and do the opposite of whatever you would have done...without second guessing it and losing faith in it.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.