IRAN will BE Referred to The UN Security Council!!

juw177 said:

Mainstream reports also tend to report an event from one side without giving any context. For example, they report that Iran is refusing to stop the enrichment program, but fail to point out that enrichment is legal and the American NIE intelligence report concluded that they do not intend to build nuclear weapons.

So we have the likes of disarray with a very distorted view.

Click to expand...

Legally Iran does have the right for uranium enrichment.
I believe every country does, but personally I would be concerned with some countries going down this line...Iran being one
Again I reiterate that Russia has been trying to broker a deal where the uranium is enriched outside of Iran...safegaurding the threat of this been used for nucleur arms...but still allowing Iran to have a nucleur energy program...From what I see Iran has flatly refused this saying its their sovereign right to use the enrichment program. To me the deal sounded ok.... and it was going to be for a probationary period with constant monitoring from the west. Again perfectly reasonable
The middle east is unstable to say the least I'm sure no one wants another country armed with nukes!!
Again both China and Russia had veto power but refused to use it...you say the west influenced them... That doesn't cut it for me it just seems like commonsense.
That may seem like a very eurocentric opinion but again I ask the question why do they need a nucleur energy program when they're sittin on the 2nd largest gas reserves in the world?

If you want a different erudition on this subject go to the last essay on www.monbiot.com under the heading "nuking the treaty"
It is done from the British aspect,but George Monbiot is a very readable British intellectual...in my opinion of course.

The article by Monbiot...dismissed as propaganda....pointed out some inconsistencies in the argument that Iran should not pursue a nuclear programme..Just a couple..
Britain has just renewed its nuclear weapon stocks,and claims that it needs nuclear weapons for self-defence.Only they and France have nuclear weapons in Europe.
And the cosy united pledge by Brown and Obama to support the rogue nuclear state ,Israel, come hell or high water.It is estimated that Israel have between sixty to eighty nuclear weapons.
With Iran now hemmed in on three sides by the predatory US ,
who can blame them for sticking to their nuclear programme.
The UN is only as strong as the commitmnent of their members..and we saw very clearly during the WMD dishonesty how some members,including Australia,treat the UN with contempt when it suits them.

The first post on this thread,looked to me as if it came straight from the Israeli embassy....correct me if I am wrong.

^^ No it was Mostsad (intentional wrong spelling..) special.

Think of this from the point of view of media and time line:

1 - Motivation (Iraq WMD. Iran U-Enrich)
2 - Sensationalization (Iran defying UN sanction doing military excercises, effect on America and its partner Isreal)
3 - Climax (Just before start of war)
4 - Result (Opps I did it again!! followed by public outcry)

I guess we are in stage 2 fast moving toward stage 3.


After a while, someone will say hey Syria looks it is trying to hide something. And the cycle of lies and deception continues.


The question to ask is why and simple answer is because they can (in Bill Clinton's own famous words is because "He could" in response to his sex scandal).

Lastly, when all the countries are invaded the hunt for shadows will continue in the old mountains of Afghanistan.

mayk, you left out what happens before your time line...

1. Prop up their regime by supplying arms and funding which the US did with Iraq and Iran in the 80s 90s.

2. Backstab the regime. Fund covert operations to destabalise country. Impose sanctions to starve out the population.


...then the media takes over as you described