This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Inflation

Our economy is going through changes that have not been seen before, yes, the basics are still there - inflation, supply & demand, wages, productivity. However, we are seeing an economy that is unable to improve productivity.

Most Australian commentators and community analysts, plus governments, have missed what arguably is the biggest social change in our society – the relentless decline in highly productive family business which is being replaced by government supported activities and to a lesser extent larger corporations.
As a result, we are turning ourselves in to a low productivity society where government and big corporate power can set prices and are often insulated from the activities of the RBA.
In previous generations, family business kept a lid on prices when the RBA squeezed the economy. Australia’s family business decline becomes a hidden force behind the failure of the RBA’s higher interest rates to have the expected impact on the consumer price index.

Small business is being hammered by rules and regulations designed by governments to get workers into large employment groups.

In years gone by, small enterprises represented a big chunk of the Australian middle class. Now they’re moving into lower income areas, and the middle class is being dominated by government employees and large enterprise executives.

And as most know, large business and government employment are inefficient and are able to increase fees and charges with little effort because there is no competition, and the consumer has no power to say no.

Government and big business are causing our high inflation and leading us to recession.


 
Last edited:
We banking on a large, or small scale Iran retaliation on Israel?

Any weird movement in the markets that anyone caught?
I'm punting none to small scale. Large scale where any serious damage in Israel and the poop will truly hit the propeller in my opinion.
 
Our economy is going through changes that have not been seen before, yes, the basics are still there - inflation, supply & demand, wages, productivity. However, we are seeing an economy that is unable to improve productivity.

I may be wrong, but I think that is one of the most accurate things posted since the last election, inflation is actually becoming lesser of a problem IMO.
The younger generation are not only screwed on property prices, they will become screwed on the job opportunity front, in the near future IMO.
High power prices, high labour costs, high property costs, doesn't bode well for a thriving business environment and a burgeoning welfare and public service sector.
I'm expecting a look of panic on the Governments faces in the near future, time will tell and I hope to hell I'm wrong.
But I think we are entering the post inflation stage, where everything is dearer.
But I'm tidying up my portfolio atm.
 
Last edited:

‘We Have All The Signatures To Get On The Ballot In Every State,’ Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Claims​



hmmm maybe there is a wild card in the game here

does anyone know what RFK's economic policy is , he won't have many Democrats to select from for his administration , could be a real grab-bag of folks
 
@divs4ever At least at this stage RFK perhaps adds a bit more than back stabbing and name calling!!!!
 
Our economy is going through changes that have not been seen before, yes, the basics are still there - inflation, supply & demand, wages, productivity. However, we are seeing an economy that is unable to improve productivity.
The trouble with productivity is it's so entrenched that I doubt anyone could just sit down and list all the issues within their own industry. Simply because there's so many little things and it's so entrenched that the unproductive way is now the normal way and for many, the only way they've been taught to do it.

That's not referring to cutting corners with safety or anything like that, just really basic stuff. The equivalent of someone saying no, goods can't be sent directly from overseas to Perth, they must be shipped via Sydney then unloaded then repacked for shipping to Perth. Failing to grasp that actually goods can be directly sent to Perth, the only thing stopping it is company policy but physically there's no reason at all to not do that but it's so entrenched that staff don't realise it's only a company rule.

That's a random made up example to illustrate the point but the concept is real and applies to everything. We've a mindset that says nope, it's not possible to do x when in truth it's easily possible, just not what some arbitrary rule requires. But when it's been that way for so long, you get a workforce that knows no other way.

Now the trouble I have with that is when you look at who's making the rules. Broadly speaking it's not coming from people who are experts on the subject and who've made the rule for a very good reason, having crunched the numbers and calculated that's the best way to do it. Rather, it's come from a generalist who was new to the job, found there was no rule in place, so made a rule. Whether the rule is any good or not they've no idea - but they've been taught that good management means tightly controlling everything so that's exactly what they do. Everything becomes absolutely rigid and inflexible.

The overall mindset and approach has essentially relegated technical know how to the backseat in favour of a focus on tight administration that produces entirely predictable results simply by reducing everything to the lowest common denominator.

Another way to look at that is we've shifted away from an approach of getting the best long term result at the expense of volatility to one that produces a very straight line on the chart at the expense of much higher costs. We've moved from high risk and high reward to low risk and low reward. At a fundamental level that's what's occurred - all the focus is on minimising risk, what that costs isn't seen as an issue.

Government's been outright full of that thinking since the 1990's but it's through the big corporates now too, and increasingly smaller business is getting caught up in it.

Noting I intend that as an economic comment not a political one.
 
Whether the rule is any good or not they've no idea - but they've been taught that good management means tightly controlling everything so that's exactly what they do.
They do things by the book so that their asses are covered smurf.

The second you do anything even so much as out of the ordinary, you expose yourself. The only people I've ever had even so much as bend a rule for me in the workplace have been the much older/experienced types that know full well if they ever faced an administrative or whatever hearing would be being questioned by people 20+ years their junior and so would well and truly tell them where to shove it (and know exactly how to tell them to shove it as well).

I actually learned to fly way back in 2014 so this scene from "sully" comes to mind as a perfect example:


You'll see at the 2.30 mark he realises what's happened and responds. For those who don't know (the movie credits don't mention this), sully actually broke procedure trying to get the engines refired because he was experienced enough to know that they simply didn't have time/height to follow the book.

Ordinarily, that's almost certain to get you court martialed. You see in the film he faces the american version of CASA and he's being questioned/challenged by people that are clearly a solid 20 odd years younger than him exactly as I described.

Now don't get me wrong, most rules exist for a damn good reason, but if someone with several decades' experience/knowledge is telling you that the rule is wrong, you should listen to them.

In the meantime, everyone are forced to do things by the book.
 
Last edited:
They do things by the book so that their asses are covered smurf.
I dont think it's that, I think we live in an age where the vast majority of the workforce (especially in transaction roles) dont understand the why behind why they actually do something.

Most people can't deviate from the process because they dont know why the process exists. Thats why many people in transactional roles will hold these rules like a bible, and will refuse to deviate, pivot or change, yet another hindrance on productivity.

We live in an age where 90% of the workforce thats coming through lacks all creativity, doesn't have any actual skills and can't think outside of an arbitrary process. When there is no framework or process around them they panic.
 
An Australian company, Employment Hero, is looking to shake up parts of the employment industry.
it provides HR, Payroll, hiring etc, all wrapped up in a cloud based software package.
What it gets is a massive amount of real time data.
Because it is not using surveys, small data samples or out of date stats that the ATO , ABS and others provide, its far more useful.
One of the things it has found is that wages on average have gone up 8.8% over the past twelve months.
From Evil Murdoch Press
 

Spot on.

Adversity creates knowledge and skills that can be used to improve and diversify, which most small business owners go through, especially when starting off and when tough times come around. Something that large corporations and governments don't know, instead they use those rules like a bible and have no flexibility.

In the past, when inflation was high and consumer budgets tight, flexible businesses found ways to reduce costs and pass on the savings. The businesses haggled or changed suppliers, reduced waste, changed procedures to reduce times required, cut back on frivolous expenses, etc. You won't see that from big government and corporations, not until the economy is truly burnt.


 
having been forbidden to use creativity in two jobs i don't doubt there is an issue there

however i did enjoy making fun of the situation

when a co-worker complained about the negativity in the work-place , i said , ' you don't have to be mad to work here ... but any sign of mental activity is a welcome surprise to management ' and before much can be said i point to a contractor , who is legally mad ' ( army psyche pension , and almost perpetually happy .. but maybe that is his pills ) ... but he has probably retired/retired now , not on a pension and working three jobs .. most days ( they must have been awesome pills )
 
.. should we ask Michele to lead by example ?

maybe trim the expenses of her office etc.
 
THE ABS has released its quarterly wages report, which shows the wages increased by 0.8% over the June Quarter.
It was slightly below the consensus figure of 0.9% , and brings the annual increases to 4.1% , marginally down from the peak of 4.2% in December.
It flies in the face of the figures reported from Employment Hero, but then there have always been questions about the methodology of the ABS (does anyone know why the ABS excludes enterprises engaged in Agriculture, Forestry or fishing and also private household employment for instance?).
The chart the ABS supplies suggests a tapering.

Mick
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...