- Joined
- 3 November 2013
- Posts
- 1,573
- Reactions
- 2,784
Hit FNGD stops yesterday, but I think we're setting up for another down legView attachment 153518
Oh dear. Good thing I sold SOXL yesterday huh?
0.6 vs estimated 0.4 month on month too.
Still in your short position bottle?
IMHO the casus belli is when earnings start reporting poorly. At the moment, there's a real battle/tug of war between rate rises and earnings. The moment earnings beats are unable to counteract the rate rises (i.e keep p/e at least neutral) it's armageddon.Interesting chart on the S&P500, testing a confluence of support with the upward sloping trendline from the October low and the downward slopping trendline from the all-time-highs. All trading involves risk, but if this latest round of hot inflation data fuels a break below these key levels, it could open the door to that next down leg.
It is and they are.Big call smurf. These companies are leviathans. They can simply buy up any and everything that even looks like it's going to be a threat. Hell, worst case for them they've got enough money/power/influence to just stifle any innovation they didn't think of themselves.
They are holding both the carrot and the stick, so to speak.
Lack of true competition.I agree danny. Almost as if there's something structural driving it that central banks can't do anything about hey?
IMHO the casus belli is when earnings start reporting poorly. At the moment, there's a real battle/tug of war between rate rises and earnings. The moment earnings beats are unable to counteract the rate rises (i.e keep p/e at least neutral) it's armageddon.
So the first order question from there is, what's going to pummel earnings? Is it going to be costs? Rate rises dump the demand side for goods/services but they don't improve the supply side. In fact, they make some of it worse.
The second order/deeper question then becomes, what's actually driving the cost increases?
Whether or not consumers do have cash to spare is irrelevant IMO.IMO the biggest problem facing us is consumer confidence, ATM as the RBA keeps saying there is still plenty of savings buffer around, consumers feel the current situation is just a blip and everything will be ok soon.
Well that confidence can turn very quickly IMO and there are plenty of storm clouds on the horizon as the Captain would say.
The next 6 months could be very telling, especially on the political front, coal and gas are a hot potato and a big contributer to the economy and to power supply stability, the growing uncertainty and the high profile media coverage gives it could very well prick the bubble IMO.
A doom and gloom period could soon wash over Sydney/Melbourne and if they sneeze the rest of the country gets a cold.
I think keeping an eye on the politicians demenour, will give an indication as to how serious it is getting, there will be some nerves tingling in Canberra, especially when Adam goes on a rant. Lol
Just my thoughts.
Also whether they're willing to spend it.Whether or not consumers do have cash to spare is irrelevant IMO.
The RBA, and other central bankers, are committed to the notion that CPI can be tamed via interest rate hikes. They are unable to abandon that paradigm without causing the market to question their necessity (what's the point of a central bank if it can't actually guarantee stability?)
So their hand is forced. They must 'get the job done' and historically, that has almost always coincided with a recession.
The thing is the RBA don't have much else at their disposal, to control inflation than interest rates, the Government has the fine control levers.Whether or not consumers do have cash to spare is irrelevant IMO.
The RBA, and other central bankers, are committed to the notion that CPI can be tamed via interest rate hikes. They are unable to abandon that paradigm without causing the market to question their necessity (what's the point of a central bank if it can't actually guarantee stability?)
So their hand is forced. They must 'get the job done' and historically, that has almost always coincided with a recession.
Your boomer parents have lived through 5 recessions or major downturns, they will be well aware of the indicators.The inflation narrative has my "lived through the 70's inflation" boomer parents very nervous.
So the narrative alone may dump consumer spending without the rba doing a damn thing.
The thing is the RBA don't have much else at their disposal, to control inflation than interest rates, the Government has the fine control levers.
So all the RBA can do is crank interest rates, until they are sure the wage/price or money supply/price spiral is under control and has stabilised or reversed.
IMO why it usually ends in recession, is because when consumers stop buying due to lack of confidence, it takes a long time to change the sentiment, that's why the recovery is usually slow from a recession.
But a lot of businesses go broke, a lot of people get unemployed, a lot of water has to go under the bridge.
Only my opinion and as usual it will be interesting t watch how it pans out.
It is and they are.
But I still remember the laughter in the office when it was announced, on mainstream news, that Apple was going into the mobile phone business. Literally nobody took it seriously. Nokia was far too entrenched and Apple are just that also-ran computer company that everyone thought would've gone broke by now, right?
It didn't take long at all for iPhones and other smartphones to become ubiquitous, Apple to become one of the most successful tech companies and Nokia to become the butt of jokes.
There's a pretty long list of companies and brands that were at the top a generation ago but which are either dead completely, or at least irrelevant, today across all sorts of industries. Giants can fall if they don't stay on top of their game.
Which, globally speaking, begs the question of where the capital will flee to.Here we gooooooooo
Fed can't tame inflation without 'significantly' more hikes that will cause a recession, paper says
The Federal Reserve is unlikely to be able to bring down inflation without having to push rates considerably higher, according to a research paper.www.cnbc.com
Just what I've been saying. The historical precedent for a recession is too strong.
Now we have former Fed governers dropping the R word.
ButtcoinWhich, globally speaking, begs the question of where the capital will flee to.
Where's the best port in the storm?
better them than me"People are becoming much more comfortable holding fixed income again".
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?