Re: QPN - Quest Petroleum
When Dirty Harry posed the question, from memory, his gun was out of bullets...... a parallel could be drawn with our position now as shareholders
I feel that the AGM may tell us a tale about what happened for the Ranau drilling not to go ahead, there must be a story to tell, anyone going to this meeting should try and elicit an answer
As to seeing what value Milewski has achieved, we may find out at the AGM the answer to your query, namely was a vote of confidence to shareholders what senior management were/are doing given by their taking shares instead of dwindling cash reserves (I know it seems excessive but look at the position we are all in),
Look at the line up of recipients, Company Secretary Jonathon Whyte, COO Ken Bull (the man who can revive and optimize actual wells), Chairman Gus Simpson, Internationally renowned investor and our adviser Michael Kamis, outside the T20 the legendary Eddie Sugar who charted FMG and Bunnings rise and establishment, ask yourself why do people like Kamis and Sugar take positions, why does Bull stay with the Company at what seemingly is a precarious position
We are certainly cash poor, hopefully we can become asset rich soon
Svengali
Well Svengali that is certainly another point of view....
I'm not sure how "crooked" the management of QPN is. Frankly they are probably on par with a host of other small oil explorers and miners.
I think my biggest beef was the way the value of the Ranau leases, the ease of drilling, the confidence in the then known fields completely disappeared after the capital raising in 2011. Investors were initially told this was a potentially excellent opportunity with the fair provisos that until you drill and see whats down there you can't be sure.
They never drilled. As I said earlier the two possibilities (or a combination) are
1) The story they fed the investors to raise capital was totally overblown or
2) They actually didn't know what had to be done or had a reasonable picture of the situation.
Take your pick here - reckless promotion, ignorant research or both.
And by the way when Dirty Harry was asking the perp if he was feeling lucky - it was not intended to encourage optimism.
_____________________________________________________________
I also have a serious question about appropriateness of a CEO drawing $338k in fees or share equivalent in what was a moribund company. I just cannot see the work or value he achieved for that money. The net result seems to be that as the SP fell the remaining cash assets of the company flowed back to the managing core via share issues.
When Dirty Harry posed the question, from memory, his gun was out of bullets...... a parallel could be drawn with our position now as shareholders
I feel that the AGM may tell us a tale about what happened for the Ranau drilling not to go ahead, there must be a story to tell, anyone going to this meeting should try and elicit an answer
As to seeing what value Milewski has achieved, we may find out at the AGM the answer to your query, namely was a vote of confidence to shareholders what senior management were/are doing given by their taking shares instead of dwindling cash reserves (I know it seems excessive but look at the position we are all in),
Look at the line up of recipients, Company Secretary Jonathon Whyte, COO Ken Bull (the man who can revive and optimize actual wells), Chairman Gus Simpson, Internationally renowned investor and our adviser Michael Kamis, outside the T20 the legendary Eddie Sugar who charted FMG and Bunnings rise and establishment, ask yourself why do people like Kamis and Sugar take positions, why does Bull stay with the Company at what seemingly is a precarious position
We are certainly cash poor, hopefully we can become asset rich soon
Svengali