Whiskers
It's a small world
- Joined
- 21 August 2007
- Posts
- 3,266
- Reactions
- 1
Explod, I agree with what you say.
I think the issue may be that chops isn't recognising my devils advocate inquiry approach... whereas some people are very matter-of-fact.
I just saw that Ifocus. Not quite sure what to make of it yet.
One problem I have with a lot of the commentary especialy from economists is they tend not to foresee changing dynamics in the future... ie to use a quote by Fred Rodell (Professor of Law, Yale) albeit he was referring to 'The Law' as an analogy, economists are a bit like the Killy-loo bird, a creature that insisted on flying backwards because it didn't care where it was going but was mightily interested in where it had been.
The caution being that measurement tools, standards and values from the past don't necessairly project the future. M3 is one fad that didn't last long.
I think the issue may be that chops isn't recognising my devils advocate inquiry approach... whereas some people are very matter-of-fact.
I just saw that Ifocus. Not quite sure what to make of it yet.
One problem I have with a lot of the commentary especialy from economists is they tend not to foresee changing dynamics in the future... ie to use a quote by Fred Rodell (Professor of Law, Yale) albeit he was referring to 'The Law' as an analogy, economists are a bit like the Killy-loo bird, a creature that insisted on flying backwards because it didn't care where it was going but was mightily interested in where it had been.
The caution being that measurement tools, standards and values from the past don't necessairly project the future. M3 is one fad that didn't last long.