Julia
In Memoriam
- Joined
- 10 May 2005
- Posts
- 16,986
- Reactions
- 1,973
This prediction about the first of the baby boomers withdrawing their funds is made repeatedly. It doesn't make a lot of sense. The baby boomers are going to still require a source of income. To suggest they are going to take all their funds out of the sharemarket takes no regard for how they are gong to derive that income. Aren't they better to still own shares and achieve over time continued growth plus an income stream? Surely better than seeing the funds lose value in a cash account?I tend to agree with the Uncle here, especially this point, but motorway also brings up a valid point. That being the Baby Boomers are setting up for retirement, and will be withdrawing super funds to use for spending.
While I don't believe it will happen at the rate proposed by Robert Kiyosaki, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Kiyosaki in "Cash Flow Quadrant", there is bound to be a consistant withdrawel all the same, and with the number of X generationers being substantially less than the Baby Boomers, money flowing in is greatly reduced. 2010 should be the start of this phenomenon.
That's unfortunate because there is not much substance in this post.
Oh well spotted! I'm assuming in the drafted message that got lost in cyberspace you qualified the above statement by saying, that although the market is in a century long uptrend, it does matter when you time your entry.
For example, if you bought $10,000 worth of the S&P500 in 1966, you would have had precisely $10,000 in 1982. adjust for inflation and you lost money.
This prediction about the first of the baby boomers withdrawing their funds is made repeatedly. It doesn't make a lot of sense. The baby boomers are going to still require a source of income. To suggest they are going to take all their funds out of the sharemarket takes no regard for how they are gong to derive that income. Aren't they better to still own shares and achieve over time continued growth plus an income stream? Surely better than seeing the funds lose value in a cash account?
I'm a baby boomer and that's what I will be doing anyway. I don't know anyone who will simply be pulling their funds out on reaching retirement age.
There are many graghs as you would well be aware, but here is one, to show the impact that we have on society... Cheers...
In essence I agree with you. But you are one of the lucky few, as I, who have chosen to actively take interest in our financial future and retirement. Unfortunately, with all due respect to the majority, they were forced to contribute to super to ensure they don't become a burden on our society via a pension scheme or the like, and only consider themselves to be an investor. Add to this the individuals company contributions, and wella.... a retirement nest egg for all.
But how many of these Baby Boomers had the sence to switch their super funds into cash? I mean, Blind Freddy could see troubled times ahead if they paid any attention at all to the global economy.
My point being, the majority may want to pay off what is left in their morgages, maybe purchase a Winnebago, do a bit of OS travel, help the grand kids with a home deposit, put in a pool, buy a holiday home... etc... whatever! All the while, there is bound to be a growing hole in the dike, being the stockmarket of course...
There are many graghs as you would well be aware, but here is one, to show the impact that we have on society... Cheers...
I started a new thread for discussion here ==>> https://www.aussiestockforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=9555In all fairness to those interested in the Baby Boomers, there are many arguements to support both theories, and the effect they may have on the financial markets. Here is an exceptionally good piece directly related to the topic. http://www.profutures.com/article.php/448/
Rather than hijack this important thread with my opinions, that are off topic, I am happy to continue in another thread, and debate the varied reasoning.
Cheers
Before you do, would you mind selling all your stock at ridiculously low prices?
thanks in advance
In all fairness to those interested in the Baby Boomers, there are many arguements to support both theories, and the effect they may have on the financial markets. Here is an exceptionally good piece directly related to the topic. http://www.profutures.com/article.php/448/
Rather than hijack this important thread with my opinions, that are off topic, I am happy to continue in another thread, and debate the varied reasoning.
Cheers
This is starting to bother me wayne. Now everybody is talking about it, could be a good contrary indicator. Although we haven't seen people completely lose it and swear off stocks forever yet.
No I didn't see that!! Is this the same mocking, smirking and jeering Art Laffer who last year made fun of Peter Schiff at every opportunity? Oh how I wish I had seen that.It's been interesting watching Kudlow & Co recently, maybe we should start a thread about it? Did you see Art Laffer throw in the towel and admit a recession is under way? Also Don Luskin admitted to being totally wrong in telling people to buy all the way down in this latest market retracement/correction insert what you like here. (big of him to admit it though). Recently I think I want a US recession to materialize just to see Kudlow, Jerry Bowyer and Brian Westbury eat a little humble pie.
Bond insurers offer insurance for bond issuers. The insurance encourages bond buyers. The trouble for the bond insurers is that they’ve insured a lot of credit derivatives too. Moyer says, “Ambac guaranteed $38 billion of debt linked to subprime mortgages and has exposure to $45 billion of other mortgage investments.” Yet those numbers are tiny compared to $45 trillion in credit default swaps outstanding.
Concerned with the amount of risk faced by the bond insurers, and chasing a horse that’s firmly out of the barn, the credit ratings agencies are threatening to downgrade the credit ratings on Ambac and fellow bond insurer MBIA. Ambac fell as much as 60% on Thursday. MBIA fell as much as 40%.
Who wants to be long this weekend again?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?