According to IADI, as of June 2006, there are currently 118 countries with a deposit insurance system in operation, pending, planned or under serious study (i.e. 95 in operation, 11 pending, 12 planned or under serious study).
Nokia obviously "considers himself" an expert on experts.
Q: Where does the average aussie get the majority of their data from about the health of the financial system?Some of the "call themselves experts" on this forum are very, very average. Don't underestimate the average aussie.
Ruddy was asked tonight about it.. Was pretty vague (as usual ). He was going on about the usual "strength of our big 4", so why not the reassurance of a guarantee?
Not sure if I'm getting upset but you are yet to show how your "investing" is any different to my trading.The more I point out the ethics of living and investing, the more some get upset. I wonder why.
Derinition of an expert;
Ex ... Something that was
Spurt.,.... A drip out of control.
No I don't go anywhere near being an expert, actually the oposite. The older I get the more things I find that I don't know. Something the young guns here have yet to learn.
One thing I do know though is that if I don't agree with some of you then I become the moron because you can't possibly be wrong. The more I point out the ethics of living and investing, the more some get upset. I wonder why.
I actually think this would be good. Its a bit hard to mark to market when there is no liquid market and every asset parcel is slightly different.
Wasn't it the change in policy late last year that caused most of this ****?
"Suspending mark-to-market accounting, in essence, suspends reality."
Beth Brooke, global vice chair at Ernst & Young LLP, WSJ, Sept 30, 2008
"Blaming fair-value accounting for the credit crisis is a lot like going to a doctor for a diagnosis and then blaming him for telling you that you are sick."
analyst Dane Mott, JPMorgan Chase & Co.,
"Suspending the mark-to-market prices is the most irresponsible thing to do. Accounting does not make corporate earnings or balance sheets more volatile. Accounting just increases the transparency of volatility in earnings."
Diane Garnick, Invesco Ltd.,
Oh Jesus, here we go again. First it was the short sellers and now it's the accounting rules. Funny how the accounting rules were working fine when the banks were making money.
I've posted about this interview on the "Rudd - I'm pissed off" thread.I saw that ........Rudd is clueless.
The interviewer was running out of time but should have nailed him on that issue.
You realise you don't know something about something, yet are prepared to make a judgements about said somethings? Why is that? Wisdom is knowing when you don't know something, and it's something you haven't grasped. I may be as opinionated as all hell, but there are a lot of things I don't know, and I make no calls about them unless it is to ask a question.No I don't go anywhere near being an expert, actually the oposite. The older I get the more things I find that I don't know. Something the young guns here have yet to learn.
One thing I do know though is that if I don't agree with some of you then I become the moron because you can't possibly be wrong. The more I point out the ethics of living and investing, the more some get upset. I wonder why.
bailout bill passed
Only the senate, still has to go back to the reps.
Do you think if they suspend mark to market rules that will create more confidence? Will banks be more willing to lend to one another knowing that their counterparty has dodgy overvalued assets on their balance sheet? We hare so much about the need for more transparency, this is the complete opposite of transparency, it's obfuscation.
oh i see, when does this happen?
Banks aren't lending because they are worried their counterparty won't be there tomorrow. What is causing the counterparties to fail- writedowns eroding capital. If their capital is preserved, less chance of falling over and more chance of borrowing from other banks.
Its obviously a bit of a bandaid fix, but we are in a perfect storm at the moment- delaying the supposed inevitable might actually end up solving some of the problems longer term.
And i fully understand the views of others who think mark to market is the only true valuation- i'm just putting this out there a bit to promote a bit of discussion
Its obviously a bit of a bandaid fix, but we are in a perfect storm at the moment- delaying the supposed inevitable might actually end up solving some of the problems longer term.
One crucial lesson stands out: speed matters. This is obvious to anyone who followed Japan's dithering in the 1990s; standing aside and hoping the problem goes away is not a good idea. Relatedly, "forbearance" --regulatory indulgence, such as permitting insolvent banks to continue in business-- does not work, as has been established in earlier research. As the authors say, "The typical result of forbearance is a deeper hole in the net worth of banks, crippling tax burdens to finance bank bailouts, and even more severe credit supply contraction and economic decline than would have occurred in the absence of forbearance." This suggests that suspending mark-to-market requirements is not a good idea.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?