- Joined
- 27 September 2006
- Posts
- 200
- Reactions
- 0
Ask anyone in Japan after 1990...Very good explanation there.. I probably haven't looked at it this way, and it does make some good sense as to what is/may happen in future.
hello,
most people aren't really interested in monetary policy or what may or may not happen in the future when buying their first house, and even many multiple property owners dont care what happens
most look at their own income and what they can buy, and go from there
whether it be rent or loan you have to live somewhere
whats happening is no aberration
looking forward to the 2yr anniversary of the thread, might have a bottle of bubbly (will pour one for you WayneL)
regards
robots
Our current monetary system is a scam and a farce.
It is the method of a few to enslave us all.
Consternation in the US CONgress.
Home prices set to surge again, fuelling debt crisis
HOME prices are about to surge again and fuel a phenomenon that a leading property analyst has dubbed "peak debt", where mortgage repayments outstrip the spending capacity of home owners.
Australian Property Monitors predicts that in the next decade many in the mortgage belt of "average Australia" will reach a point where they are unable to put food on the table because loan repayments swallow their incomes.
Yesterday the Labor leader, Kevin Rudd, confirmed housing affordability as an election issue by calling a summit to address it. Housing, finance and community groups will discuss more than 30 proposals put forward by Labor aimed at boosting home ownership.
Australian Property Monitors, a property analysis group owned by the publisher of the Herald, Fairfax Media, upgraded its forecast of home prices over the next year from stable to rising by 5 per cent.
The political stoush intensified with the Prime Minister blaming the states and the NSW Treasurer blaming higher interest rates for keeping home ownership out of the reach of many people.
The general manager of Australian Property Monitors, Michael McNamara, said he coined the term "peak debt" to echo the "peak oil" theory, which suggests the production of oil has peaked and is running out. Likewise the capacity to borrow will simply run out, he claims.
"Australians want more affordable houses for children but not at the expense of their own house price growth," Mr McNamara said.
Census figures published last week show national home loan repayments soak up 31.6 per cent of average household income, up from 27.7 per cent in 2001.
Independent economists agreed that a crunch time was on its way in which Australians would reach their capacity for borrowing. At that point they could put a dent in economic growth as their spending power was removed.
Mr McNamara predicted that if average house prices continued to outstrip rises in incomes at the current rate, by 2016 there would be no money left after paying a mortgage.
Steve Keen, associate professor at the school of economics and finance at the University of Western Sydney, agreed, saying household debt was roughly 25 per cent of disposable income in 1990, and that proportion had risen to 150 per cent. "We can't keep on doing that forever," he said.
But "peak debt" was not a theory shared by interest rate analysts in the financial markets. A Macquarie Bank interest rate strategist, Rory Robertson, said the census figures showed one-third of home owners did not have a mortgage.
He said those vulnerable to high debt had bought into the market in the past three years and only comprised about 10 per cent of the market.
"The Reserve Bank of Australia will manage interest rates in a way that protects Australian borrowers," Mr Robertson said.
The Reserve Bank meets in Sydney today to discuss rates. No move is expected this month, but a strong economy is expected to fuel two more rises over the next 12 months.
Mr Rudd said housing affordability was a crisis facing many working families, "and we don't want the Federal Government just to play the blame game with this and blame somebody else".
He sought to cast affordable housing as a central plank of good economic management.
But the Prime Minister, John Howard, reiterated the Government's claim that the lack of home affordability was a result of state governments not releasing enough new land.
A spokesman for the NSW Treasurer, Michael Costa, denied land supply was a problem. He said there was already enough land available in NSW to accommodate 33,000 new homes. "The biggest threat to home affordability remains the current interest rate environment," he said.
Among Labor's proposals is allowing first-home buyers to divert pre-tax income into an account to build a deposit. The money might be treated the same way as salary sacrifice contributions to super.
Figures in Labor's housing proposals show the last four interest rate rises have added $91,677 to interest repayments over the life of a loan for the median-priced Sydney home. The figures also show the annual income needed to buy a median-priced home in Sydney has risen from $62,800 in 1996 to $145,412 this year.
Housing groups welcomed Labor's proposal for a national summit and for a superannuation-style savings scheme for first home buyers.
The Housing Industry Association said Labor had thrown down the gauntlet to the Federal Government, which "has been mute on policy measures necessary to deal with the housing affordability crisis".
http://www.smh.com.au/news/national...1183351125207.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1
hello,
looks like the complete opposite is happening though kimo
money is getting poured into the existing home/unit market, some of the info out today indicates Aus is around 30k homes short a year
companies want mega profits for their building materials
thankyou
robots
Aussie housing is so heading for a massive crash...
I predict we'll go back to 2001 prices.
For every new dollar lent for house purchases in
2003, around 40 cents went to investors,
compared with only 25 cents in 1994.
According to the RBA this is higher than in
comparable developed countries. In 2002 and
2003, the stock of outstanding credit for
investors rose around 30 per cent per year
compared with 20 per cent for owner occupiers.
...In fact, there are no specific aspects of the current
Australian tax system that are designed to
encourage investment in property over other
assets.
I'm not sure what 'should' happen with my own patch of dirt.hello,
top effort waysolid, got to be in it to win it
for many people even one property would be helpful, your home, an extremely passive investment
replacement cost of a house is having a huge impact, material companies want massive profits, contractors want massive profits
thankyou
robots
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?