- Joined
- 27 February 2008
- Posts
- 4,670
- Reactions
- 10
)
In any case argument is all but redundant as this is unfolding as we speak, we will know within 6 months who is right.
who is disagreeing ?
)
In any case argument is all but redundant as this is unfolding as we speak, we will know within 6 months who is right.
who is disagreeing ?
Here's a chart from tonight’s ABC news. It looks like the property market is at least 23% overcooked.
The bulls and bears are at each other as usual, but very soon all they need do is look up at the scoreboard and they'll see whats unfolding.
I have thought residential property prices have been unrealistic for some time and there are many who feel the same way.
An interesting aspect you've touched upon by your questions is the activity of the most high profile bear, Stevie Keen.yes but from my understanding you have property as investment also and it kind of counteracts the whole cycle , i too have rented in the past and let other renters pay for my propertys.
yep understand the amount of longterm renters here but still inquisitive if they prepared to rent till they finally decide they have found the perfect low before entering the property market
An interesting aspect you've touched upon by your questions is the activity of the most high profile bear, Stevie Keen.
Despite banging on for years about the impending doom, he only just recently listed his property for sale. At least there are plenty of posters here who have been consistent and put their money where their mouth is.
People wonder why I don't hold much respect for Keen...
Fair comment - traditionally equities have outperformed residential property over the long term, although recent events may scare a few for years to come.The other interesting part of this is that the compound growth line in real terms since 1926 is only 3%.
I would like a better return for my long term life savings.
My point exactly. Even a broken clock is right twice a daykeens just like the rest of the majority of overpaid mouthpieces , great typist and he bound to call it right sooner or later if he sticks to the same story
I'd say about 20% of the houses around me have for sale signs on them, or have changed hands in the last year tech. But it is a high rental and thus high specuvestor area I would imagine.As I drive around here (Where I live) there arent many for sale signs.
Correct. And no matter how highly paid you are, or how educated, it is going to bite a lot of people on the **** who would never have thought it possible at one stage.Its not the interest rate thats going to kill people its being un employed!
and i repeat , who is disagreeing ? ive said my views, mofra has stated his all along this thread also .
still wondering who you talking about
I was talking generally to the bulls that dont see a problem, who specifically ? well I could go back through all the posts and make notes .........naa I won't.
Mofra seemed to waste no time denegrating one of my posts so I assume the cat is a bull, anyway I'm not interrsted in arguing with anyone the facts will speak for themselves.
An interesting aspect you've touched upon by your questions is the activity of the most high profile bear, Stevie Keen.
Despite banging on for years about the impending doom, he only just recently listed his property for sale. At least there are plenty of posters here who have been consistent and put their money where their mouth is.
People wonder why I don't hold much respect for Keen...
Some people will take their analysis a little further and won't have a black and white opinion.
There will be a negative impact on property prices, but its depth and duration will vary enormously depending on the location and type of property involved. Similarly the affect of an economic slump on rentals will vary in different locations. This will depend on a multitude of factors including the types of industry that make up the local economy, the drivers for local population growth and the rate of population growth, the current and historic vacancy rates, rental yields and supply situation etc. etc.
It is far too simplistic to make a blanket statement that property prices will fall 40%.
I've yet to see much detailed analysis beyond these blanket statements and very little historic price analysis that takes land values into account. Back in the 60's a 'house' was on a quarter acre block. In 2008 a 'house' in McMansion ville is on blocks as small as 200sqm or 400sqm. Thus the 1960's house is actually now 3 or 4 blocks of land ... or if its in a high density area it might even be a block of 8 or more flats ... or have been consolidated into a larger block of 50 flats ... or may even have been consolidated into a highrise office or apartment block .... or turned into 5 ultra trendy restaurants, or a luxury beach front hotel etc. etc.
Property investment is about location and land.
It is far too simplistic to make a blanket statement that property prices will fall 40%.
I'm fairly conservative but I'm almost certain this is the "big one"
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.