If RE's success is linked with the big 4 bank's success, then why would anyone take a 5% yield in property at the top of a RE boom, when instead you can buy ANZ stock 50% off, with a 15% yield?
Personally, I'd buy both!
Beej
If RE's success is linked with the big 4 bank's success, then why would anyone take a 5% yield in property at the top of a RE boom, when instead you can buy ANZ stock 50% off, with a 15% yield?
Nope. Low interest rates would have been a 'preemptive strike' had they been cut 12 months ago.
The RBA were caught with their pants down, and this effort of pulling them up is only going to end up with getting caught in the zipper. It is going to be very painful.
Personally, I'd buy both!
Beej
I actually think it is within the realms of possibility that houseprices increase alot ....
But not in real terms, an Inflationary screwup by central banks is very possible ....
Currently, short term I see deflation happening and more likely to continue.
You just need to keep your finger on the pulse and adapt to market changes.
No. What I'm suggesting is that since the RBA are most likely going to drop the rates so much - this is reflective of the forecasts for our economy. If unemployment was not to rise, they wouldn't be dropping rates The RBA drops rates when they economy is in the toilet, and at the rate they're dropping them ... something is very seriously wrong with Australia, but few know it.
[snipped - straw man argument drivel + irrelevant and dubious Japanese economic commentary probably lifted from GHPC forums]
Indeed. And I've said so elsewhere. Property looks like an awful investment at the moment when you look at other asset classes at the moment. Can't see a reason for any fresh money going into property for the foreseeable future.If RE's success is linked with the big 4 bank's success, then why would anyone take a 5% yield in property at the top of a RE boom, when instead you can buy ANZ stock 50% off, with a 15% yield?
Whereas the only way I can think of positive gearing a house at the moment, goes something like this:
1) Buy house
2) Install meth lab
3) Sell drugs
Result = LOTS of positive gearing.
ROE - you are the robot's of the bear side of this argument!
Beej
Comparing Japan to Australia is absolutely puerile and presupposes so much and assumes so much and extrapolates so much - every nation has its own dynamics - Japan is VERY different to Australia - ridiculous comparison and to say we will go down their path is countered by me saying it has not!
No - RENT the house out to crooks who take care of 2) and 3) and charge an appropriate rent premium! That way you don't carry either the financial, or the "freedom" risk
Beej
We need to get away from the ideology that every one should own a house they are just another consumable the same a Boat or a 4WD and do nothing to help the GDP.
House designs should be regulated and a CGT say over 1M be imposed.
To stop a repeat for this FWD we have the ideal situation to explore new ideas and head of in a new direction.
But dream on it will never happen.
What a load of alarmist rubbish! Look at the stats a few posts back that show a CLEAR uptrend in the number of FHBs as a proportion of property purchases - especially in the last quarter, and especially in Sydney. This proportion will be even higher this quarter.
Beej
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.