- Joined
- 19 February 2016
- Posts
- 953
- Reactions
- 1,544
Full year not half. https://goldroad.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/2021-Annual-Report_Website.pdf Page 61Can't find Half Yearly results but the Quarterly doesn't seem to match those Costs/ASIC? numbers of $2100. Looks like their 'equivalents' are quite a bit on the cash side. Must be what they get from DGO deal perhaps?
Last preso broad numbers:
View attachment 141765
On the half year results at roughly 124,000 ounces GOR made about $2250/oz revenue and had $2100/oz in costs - which left about $150/oz for other things (dividends). That's not a great margin to be playing with given we're seeing diesel and labor costs skyrocket and how difficult it is to get anything with a computer chip. So about $18 million cash for a $1.1 billion market cap. And using GOR shares to dilute holders into acquiring another junior which holds shares in other juniors??? Hmm...
From the recent quarter: "Free cash flow before payment of dividends was $1.1 million for the quarter" - Yet this is based on:
AISC of $1526/oz
Revenue of $2434/oz
However you choose to look at things this is not a great outcome. I liked GOR years ago when it looked like it was going to be a good high tonne/low cost operation but It seems to me this operation has just never quite hummed along as it should have.
From the feasibility: Estimated average all-in sustaining cost (AISC) of A$945 (US$690⁶) per ounce over LOM with a payback of less than one-third of LOM. So in less than 6 years costs have essentially gone up over 60% - is that inflation or incompetence? Blame covid?
So which of you are correct?Can't find Half Yearly results but the Quarterly doesn't seem to match those Costs/ASIC? numbers of $2100. Looks like their 'equivalents' are quite a bit on the cash side. Must be what they get from DGO deal perhaps?
Last preso broad numbers:
View attachment 141765
probably me , with 'be careful 'So which of you are correct?
gg
Please don't ever reply to me with DYOR.probably me , with 'be careful '
the ( renamed DGO, formerly Drummond Gold Limited ) certainly never made my radar until this take-over , is the true value lying in the minor shareholdings in other explorers
March 2022 Quarterly Report DGO Gold Limited (ASXGO) is pleased to report on its March 2022 quarter activities. DGO continues to advance its objective of shareholder wealth creation through its brownfield and greenfield gold discovery strategy. This strategy has led to Gold Road Limited (ASX:GOR) making an off-market takeover offer for DGO subsequent to the end of quarter. Highlights
• IOCG targets have been identified at Pernatty by detailed gravity surveys at predicted depths to target of less than 400m.
• A Native Title Agreement for DGO’s 100% owned Pernatty tenements was approved by Common Law Holders of the Kokatha.
• Drilling at Yerrida and Judge’s Find testing the equivalent stratigraphic position to Sandfire Resources’ DeGrussa copper-gold mine intersected extensively altered volcanic and sedimentary stratigraphy with high potential for hosting Volcanogenic Hosted Massive Sulphides (VHMS).
• DGO has a 14.4% interest in De Grey Mining (ASX: DEG). DEG reported the results of extensional drilling at Falcon and Diucon during the quarter. The market value of DGO’s holding at April 21, 2022 was $276 million.
• DGO has a 20.1% interest in Yandal Resources Limited’s (ASX: YRL). YRL reported excellent results for a number of prospects during the quarter. The market value of DGO’s holding at April 21, 2022 was $6.7 million.
• DGO has a 6.6% interest in Dacian Gold (ASX: DCN).
During the quarter DCN announced significant exploration results below the current resources at Jupiter and a maiden ore reserve for the Hub deposit. The market value of DGO’s holding at April 21, 2022 was $21 million.
a side-door ( and possible seat on the board ) to DEG , perhaps
DYOR
buying POTENTIAL resources is usually a 'big boy's game ( NCM , NST , EVN and to a limited extent OZL )
unless they are hoping to be swallowed by someone BIGGER ( making themselves a juicy target )
Full year not half. https://goldroad.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/2021-Annual-Report_Website.pdf Page 61
$278.6 million receipts/ 123.6koz = $2,260/oz
$278.6-89.3 million (op cashflow) + 60.3 million (capex) + 10 m (leases) = $259.8 / 123.6koz = $2,107/oz
$278.6-89.3 / 123.6koz = $1,540/oz (roughly their ASIC)
AISC is a relatively useless number by itself so I added in capital and leases, (I know it smudges around the timing of costs and sales, but a year is reasonable period to average results in my opinion and it counters the accounting witchcraft used) My biggest issue with small miners is that punters like us are always in the dark with regards to capital/exploration $$$ until the end of the reporting periods.
DGO might be a good idea, but might be a bad idea. Only time will tell - but textbooks tell me in general that using your shares for acquisitions is only done when you feel your shares are overvalued or they are your only asset (i.e a junior explorer). I just personally think it's poor form for a mid-regional miner to invest in a non-producer unless there are some serious synergies (such as deposit next door). There is just so much pressure on these companies to make deals to reward the backroom faceless men. What's in this for DGO?
Thanks @Sean K .@Garpal Gumnut and The T, I've been doing a sieve through their last few reports trying to reconcile the costs and I haven't quite got there. I think Triangle is calculating costs slightly differently to what I scan and what the company is claiming.
Their Corporate All in Costs (CAIC) is calculated as: AISC + growth capital + corporate costs + exploration costs)/ounces produced. Which was about $1800 in the March quarterly. I'm not sure what's missing from that and The T's calcs other than leases?
View attachment 141769
The numbers I had for the period Jan 2021-December 2021 and were simple "cash in/cash out" costs - they didn't take into account accounting accruals/payables/receivables. I expect for your average miner that these costs will not be significant year to year (except when developing or closing an operation). For example if GOR spent $10 million on December 31st for a couple of new trucks - that would be included on my costs per ounce calculation - but in reality it wouldn't be a cost assigned to that financial year.@Garpal Gumnut and The T, I've been doing a sieve through their last few reports trying to reconcile the costs and I haven't quite got there. I think Triangle is calculating costs slightly differently to what I scan and what the company is claiming.
Their Corporate All in Costs (CAIC) is calculated as: AISC + growth capital + corporate costs + exploration costs)/ounces produced. Which was about $1800 in the March quarterly. I'm not sure what's missing from that and The T's calcs other than leases?
View attachment 141769
the D***
the 'adds value ' in this case seems to include the value of the DGO share-holdings ( in other companies ) which seems to be over $250 million ( Australian ) so i am guessing all financial metrics in the report are in Australian Dollars ( unless marked otherwise )Thanks @Sean K .
My reading which is not as extensive as yours agrees.
I share @divs4ever point about the t/o of DGO, it complicates the analysis of a successful company though they say it adds value.
The market is never wrong.
gg
No offence, just annoyance.the D***
is to remind folks i am NOT a professional and they must double check everything i post
i am sorry if you take offense at that
cheers
i double check ( and triple-check ) myself all the time , so hope others always make their own decisions ( and make decisions in their own best long-term interests )No offence, just annoyance.
You don't need to say the D*** on ASF. It is a given.
We know you are not a professional.
I would never double check anything you say, I might doubt its veracity, it might lead me to check something else.
But no mate , nobody thinks you belong to that evil, decrepit, deceitful mob known as Financial Advisers UNLESS YOU SAY DYOR.
It is an annoying feature of HC and Comsec and seems to have permeated ASF since refugees from those pathetic forums migrated here,
Can you imagine anyone from ASIC wasting time trawling through ASF members posts.
Asking for advice is the main No No. Giving advice is another.
You and my rabbiting on is not financial advice by its very nature.
DIMMC ?
OWYLMTBME.
I can do a whole post in idiotic acronyms that apart from being annoying would not protect you in a court of law.
If you wish to discuss it further, start a thread on it, END.
gg
No worries.i double check ( and triple-check ) myself all the time , so hope others always make their own decisions ( and make decisions in their own best long-term interests )
cheers
MickShareholders in De Grey Mining who are yet to top up their position through the company’s share purchase plan may want to have a quick listen to the comments made by Gold Road boss Duncan Gibbs before Friday’s cut-off date.
The $1-a-share SPP is already a no-brainer for those with the spare cash lying around, given that De Grey has been trading above the issue price since mid October.
But in last week’s analyst call to discuss Gold Road’s September quarter production figures, Mr Gibbs added just a touch more fuel to the speculation that Gold Road may not quite be finished with its 20 per cent holding in De Grey.
De Grey is on the hunt for some fresh faces for its board, after the surprise resignation of Samantha Hogg ahead of the company’s November 24 annual shareholder meeting.
It also lost non-executive directors Ed Eshuys and Jeffrey Parncutt in early September.
Both were directors of DGO Gold, and left the De Grey board after DGO was taken out by Gold Road.
That takeover resulted in Gold Road emerging with a 14.5 per cent stake in De Grey, which it has since topped up to 19.99 per cent.
costs are ( mostly ) increasing across the globe , there is a realistic possibility credit availability will decrease , not a good recipe for a miner ( or brownfields project ) not fully cashed up ,GOR this quarter:
AISC: $1426
Cash on hand end of qtr: $91 million
Cash on hand start of qtr: $161 million
Cash decrease Q on Q: $70 million
With $80 million spent on Degrey shares and a $10 million dividend my rough calculation is that they generated $20 million of positive cashflows in the quarter - which is about $80 million a year. If that is all paid out as a dividend at a market cap of $1.65 billion it's a 4.8% dividend - ok for a miner but only average by dividend standards. Not highly accurate analysis I know - but it's a rough calculation which tells me that I should still keep an eye on GOR. I think of all the goldies out west they've probably had the best quarter?
Mines eventually run out of gold/copper/nickel/iron/zinc/etc. etc. I hope GOR makes some moves soon to either transition itself into an investment vehicle (which means selling their share of Gruyere) or does something to open up additional mines.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?