- Joined
- 30 January 2005
- Posts
- 374
- Reactions
- 1
YOUNG_TRADER said:lol, I'm actually looking to sell the car n get a Boxster S or Merc SLK 350,
Back on gold, I am looking @ LHG now, can't go back to BDG just yet, production is so far away (proper levels anyway won't be achieved until 2008)
Profitseeker said:You should look at adding some BDG!
nizarnizar said:120koz p.a is a joke, LHG is 670koz and 800koz... yeh people say its hedged but the hedging is only 30% of those figures, the rest delivered to spot market
Hegarty worked out that hedging was a losing game
LHG will still produce over twice as much "unhedged" gold as OXR in 2006, with relatively similar profit margins per ounce
nizarnizar said:I wish it was so, from their quarterly reports, LHG cash costs per oz was US$276 and OXR sepon gold cash costs BLEW OUT from an already expensive US$350 and last quarter they were US$550....
From Lihir's March Quarter Report: Cost discipline maintained with gross cash costs of $340 per ounce for the first quarter.
from Oxiana's March Quarter Report: Costs
Total cash costs for the quarter were higher at $348/oz reflecting the impacts of the changes in mine plan.
nizar said:also wats the difference btw gross cash costs and total cash costs, i noticed gross cash costs is the figure of $340 as quoted by you
nizar said:Why would u want to do that?
LHG provides far better leverage to rising price of gold
Compare the movements of gold and LHG and BDG and see which one moves better - its LHG
120koz p.a is a joke, LHG is 670koz and 800koz... yeh people say its hedged but the hedging is only 30% of those figures, the rest delivered to spot market
I hold LHG
Of course, but I think this has already been factored in to the price. BGF is the same. The only way these will spike is take-over. Just my opinion.Profitseeker said:Hi Nizar,
I do recognise LHG as a good play on the price of Gold. However if you are just buying a company to play the price of Gold then you might as well buy Gold. I think what you get with BDG over LHG is:
- Bdg is a stronger take over target. i don't personally think LHG is.
- BDG has bigger potential to upgrade existing reserves
- BDG presents less risk if there is a correction in commodity prices
- BDG operates in a country with low instability.
- People will start buying in to BDg in anticipation of it being a producer in June.
Is that a silly, silly, or silly idea?Profitseeker said:I do recognise LHG as a good play on the price of Gold. However if you are just buying a company to play the price of Gold then you might as well buy Gold.
rederob said:Is that a silly, silly, or silly idea?
You could have got onto LHG for a dollar one year .
LHG is now over $3 and gold has incresed in price by how much in the same period?
Bullion and equities "cycle" separately, so it is possible to have a foot in each camp and step heavier or lighter in time with their cycles.
But percentage gains in the better gold equities (ie the mostly unhedged ones) will continue to outstrip POG gains going forward.
stockmaster said:The three main gold companies that i have observed which has a potential in raising for the next few months are LHG, OXR, BSG in the respective order. Any suggestion for its price in the next few months.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?