- Joined
- 15 June 2023
- Posts
- 1,187
- Reactions
- 2,594
I agree Sean. I've checked price action a few times during the day and once 2950 is breached there will be little resistance to getting to 3000. Last time I spent a few minutes watching the action 2946 + was being threatened with continuing orders. Beyond 3000 should not be that difficult either.Potentially breaking out of this little box. Next stop probably a big round number.
View attachment 193655
i would expect , that more likely is has been over-promised several times over after all the US grabbed the ACTUAL gold that Iraq had in the Gulf War 2 , so there should be a few bars left insideSalty's excited about this.
now of course it MIGHT have been hidden elsewhere so the Soviets couldn't nuke it ( Fort Knox and the gold ) making it 'untouchable ' for a century or twoI thought it went without saying that it would boost the price of gold if it was ever discovered.
I think it's fair to say that even if Fort Knox was never looted, other significant gold stores have been and for similar reasons it has been kept secret. There are plenty of vaults and warehouses full of gold around the world, obviously some have been looted in a big world with so many, we just don't know which ones or how many.
But Fort Knox specifically? Sure, it would boost your gold's value, but that story going public would harm your life more than help it. We're currently in the most significant cold war in history, and we can't afford the USA to lose.
cold war ?now of course it MIGHT have been hidden elsewhere so the Soviets couldn't nuke it ( Fort Knox and the gold ) making it 'untouchable ' for a century or two
and that is as good a theory as it is perfectly safe and intact in Fort Knox .. but you have to trust your government official about that ( for the last 50 years ) .. BTW surely there have been some additions and removals in the last 50 years of are all the doors welded shut ?
but .but , but the US has THOUSANDS of computer servers , keeping track can't be as hard as say the department of motor vehicles database , or even the passport checking at a major airportCounting the gold isn't easy because they've got years of paperwork to go through some of the gold was basically rented out, some of it was swapped, some of it slipped into people's back pockets, and some were owned by the deceased.
They'll be borrowing against the gold IMO, there are only two ways for Trump to get out of this large surplus trade debt, either inflate it away or default on it. The US has the biggest stash of gold bullion at this stage so I guess they'll be king of the castle in this respect.
It's been there previous to the internet being invented and the last audit was in the 1950s.but .but , but the US has THOUSANDS of computer servers , keeping track can't be as hard as say the department of motor vehicles database , or even the passport checking at a major airport
DOES the US have the biggest stash .. Russia for instance was sending 90% of the local gold production straight into their central bank , AND they buy a few ton from the international markets
( and those Eurocrats haven't managed to loot the Russian/Soviet Treasury despite trying for more than 200 years )
The game switches now to silently and rapidly securing actual physical gold and to exit the London market where the promissory note gold scam has been overseen and coordinated by the Bank of England for decades.During this period it has also become clear that the estimated 400M oz. of London market cash/spot gold contracts for immediate gold ownership and settlement have widely been shown in default. And that was for an estimated 10M oz. of gold draw-down on London vaults.
The mumbled argument that 8 weeks of delay to London delivery is simply due to a slow Bank of England gold lease facility is moot - leasing gold is what is done by market participants when they are asked to deliver metal that they do not have.
London gold spot/cash contract holders are under no illusion now - they’ve been had.
now of course it MIGHT have been hidden elsewhere so the Soviets couldn't nuke it ( Fort Knox and the gold ) making it 'untouchable ' for a century or two
and that is as good a theory as it is perfectly safe and intact in Fort Knox .. but you have to trust your government official about that ( for the last 50 years ) .. BTW surely there have been some additions and removals in the last 50 years of are all the doors welded shut ?
I always thought bride price was measured in the number of camels, but there you goAnother important, if not the most important reason to buy or gift Gold is sex. Marriage, for those members born in the last 40 years is surprisingly still quite popular among the Chinese, Muslim and Hindu cousins. During these cathartic events prior to consummation families come together and exchange the cost of the loss of freedom of the husband and the burden of a wife via the exchange of goods. Gold figures highly as a medium of celebration at these events. Economic tribulations in sunny climes has led to a decrease in marriage but it is now said to be picking up again. Thus the demand for Gold will pick up via the increase in marriages now that we leave the early year festivals behind and look forward to the Muslim and Hindu cousins celebrating later in the year.
While we may argue about the macro events such as tariffs and the lack of Gold in London, the leasing and theft of Gold from Fort Knox and the effects of the parlous mental health of the Orange Emperor on the price, underlying it all is retail, spending on Gold for adornment and celebration, for ensuring a spot in the afterlife and for being able to indulge in sex.
Thus to recent price action for short term traders in gold. There has been a cluster of activity in Gold in all markets between $2950 and $2930, and I believe this area will provide some support in the task of punching through $3000 and resistance against recovery on retracements below it. I expect the price to stabilise in this area, under $3000 or below for some time, as it did before going up through $2000.
The attached article from Kitco.com touches on these themes and the chart illustrates the clustering of buyers and sellers in all Gold markets over the last 3 days.
So, enjoy your trading in Gold, but don't forget why it is such a popular investment, sexual activity and the afterlife.
gg
Never had the distinction of buying a camel for marriage I’d imagine one would pay in gold. The Houthi word for camel sounds distinctly like that for gold.I always thought bride price was measured in the number of camels, but there you go
(one hump or two?)
I always thought bride price was measured in the number of camels, but there you go
(one hump or two?)
Last year some of us were talking about the very large cup and handle showing up on the gold chart. I noticed this and it was one of the reasons I bought in early last year. The target was approximately $3,100. I hadn't seen anyone talking about it and after I noticed it I had to go searching online to find discussions about it, and then further after the beakout more and more people were talking about it, but in the last few months as we've come closer to that target, no one is mentioning it any more. I wonder if it will still have any relevance? Likely not since the rally has coincided with economic and sentimental conditions favourable to a sustained run and the C&H was probably just one thing contributing to the stellar rally we've seen over the last year or so.
Crossing $3,000 is going to be an interesting event.
The target we discussed here a couple of years ago was around $2700.
that was just one small ( border-line critical mass )deviceDropping a nuke on Fort Knox wouldn't make the gold radioactive. I've been to Hiroshima, no one worries about radioactivity, there's a building still standing directly under the blast (due to some interesting quirks of physics) and it's safe to go inside it.
The gold at Fort Knox isn't just sitting on the surface or under a tarp transparent to ionising radiation.
A nuke would make a mess of the building, but the gold bars (whatever is actually there) wouldn't be harmed by radiation.
Hypothetically though, if you had gold which was radioactive and would be "untouchable for a century or two", it would be interesting to know what it would be worth today. If in a century or two it would be worth as much as any other gold, and all the gold bars radioactive or not are just going to sit around in secure storage, why would the value be different? Maybe the radioactive bars would be more valuable because they have an inbuilt theft deterrent system which won't have to be restored for a century or two.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?