- Joined
- 17 January 2007
- Posts
- 2,986
- Reactions
- 32
It is down from $1800, which is more than 30% decline.
Not sure where you pluck a return better than the share market?
It seems gold has been trending down from it peak for years, while paying no dividends, the value of the share market + dividends has gone up dramatically.
It is down from $1800, which is more than 30% decline.
Does it not bother any gold bugs that the gold stock piles increase every year?
I mean we have a metal that apart from jewellery has almost no industrial use that comes anywhere near using the annual production rate of gold mines, so it is stock piled year after year.
I can't see anything that really offers price support if the large number of people who currently hold it, decide to get back into more productive assets.
It's not like oil or iron ore where the stockpiles will get used up.
Gold prices may need to fall another 30 per cent to reach fair value, according to Deutsche Bank, with cheap oil the only potential lifeline for the battered precious metal.
Gold is currently trading around $US1096, just above last week's fresh five-year low of $US1072.30.
But Deutsche's paper Estimating fair value for gold argues the price of the precious metal needs to drop substantially to bring valuation levels back towards historical averages.
"Gold would need to fall towards $US750 per ounce to bring prices in real terms back towards long-run historical averages," said Deutsche.
Deutsche ran the gold price through several models to determine "fair value" for the precious metal.
The Deutsche "gold price model", which factors in world growth, the US dollar, money supply and central bank gold purchases, calculated fair value at $US785 per ounce.
Still making bacon at $1500 though.
Any strength in the Aussie will now mean your gold positions start losing, asset price fluctuations don't normally bother me, but that's all you have with gold.
Deutsche ran the gold price through several models to determine "fair value" for the precious metal.
The Deutsche "gold price model", which factors in world growth, the US dollar, money supply and central bank gold purchases, calculated fair value at $US785 per ounce.
Wow! You really mean to tell me that if my local currency appreciates against the current global reserve, the purchasing power of that currency over physical items goes up?
.
Have you worked out you return from you gold position on a per annum basis?
How does it compare to just holding the asx 200 index? (Be sure to factor in the compounded income from the index, as this is my main argument against gold)
Here we go again? I know it's a hard concept to get your head around but it's not about returns, it's about insurance and preservation of wealth for me. I have a percentage of my liquid assets in gold; some in shares; some in property. Gold doesn't need to make a 'return' to be compared with other 'assets'.
As I keep saying, gold only has to sit there in readiness for a fiat extinction event. I'd love not to have anything to do with gold but unfortunately humans being humans will guarantee that they will always live beyond their means on debt to the point of a debt recession or in the coming scenario, a depression?
How much faith do you have in economists, masquerading as central bakers, to save the world?
The relative alternative when everyone scrambles to the same exit door...............
Would the average cost per ounce to mine this rare, malleable metal be a rough base. I guess that is around US$1000.
As I said, earlier today Greek farmland produces Eurodollars, next year it might produce drachmas, if the drachmas halves in value it will produce double the amount of drachmas, if we go bit coin, the farmland will produce bit coin, and every year you can take this income and buy more assets (compounding) or you can spend it.
gold is not holding value, it has been losing value, it's just a possibly temporary shift in U.S/ Aussie dollar that's giving it the illusion of holding value, the fiat US dollar would have been a better hold than gold, because you still would have benefited from the currency move, without losing in U.S. Dollar terms.
or better yet, buy an asset that went up in U.S. Dollar terms, while also getting the currency shift as a bonus eg buy Us stocks.
If you are worried about fiat currency, why not hold an asset that provides the same currency protection, but also delivers a return, that way you will have the protection and compounding?
As I said, earlier today Greek farmland produces Eurodollars, next year it might produce drachmas, if the drachmas halves in value it will produce double the amount of drachmas, if we go bit coin, the farmland will produce bit coin, and every year you can take this income and buy more assets (compounding) or you can spend it.
gold is not holding value, it has been losing value, it's just a possibly temporary shift in U.S/ Aussie dollar that's giving it the illusion of holding value, the fiat US dollar would have been a better hold than gold, because you still would have benefited from the currency move, without losing in U.S. Dollar terms.
or better yet, buy an asset that went up in U.S. Dollar terms, while also getting the currency shift as a bonus eg buy Us stocks.
Can anybody here tell me whether the growth in the human population is outperforming or underperforming the growth in physical gold reserves?
and I think we can all agree that share market is not exactly like owning a business in each of these areas. i would if i could
Gold production is probably out performing, considering more is being mined than is used for any practicle purpose.
I don't agree, I think being a longterm owner of a diverse portfolio of marketable equity securities that are link to these types of assets, with owner focused management is pretty much the same (probably better) as directly owning businesses in each area.
And there is no doubt that owning a diverse portfoilio of productive assets will out perform the holding of a commodity over the long term.
On any given day, week or even year Gold may out perform other assets in marke price, But the fact it doesn't grow or compound means it will not do this over any long period of time, So sitting on gold is not a very productive allocation of capital.
If you notice the gold promoters on this thread continually leave out the income generated by other asset classes in their calculations, I don't know if this is intentional or just ignorance, but the will compare the longterm market price of gold against a property investment with out factoring in rental income, or a sharemarket investment without factoring in dividends.
If they did their calculation honestly, and included the income, them would find gold gets smashed by other assets, and the longer the holding period gets the worse it is.
Yes, I also have farmland with secure water - do you?
......
Your point about gold quantity always increasing - the same can be said for fiat by CB's - last count total global QE was $11Trillion! There's obviously too many USD's sloshing around the globe -
Let's see now. For the average Joe investing in the US over the years, in the 1973-74 bear market, investors had to wait seven and a half years to get back to even. In the 2000-02 bear market, investors didn’t break even until 2007.
if one bothered to look at history, one can plainly see that stocks are a *crap* inflation hedge, unless you are super smart and time the market to avoid the initial inflation shock.
.
counterintuitively to most, a shortage of good money. so how is your farm going to get paid?
just dont come on here to troll and spout ignorant, trite, tripe.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?