explod
explod
- Joined
- 4 March 2007
- Posts
- 7,341
- Reactions
- 1,198
If i were valuing a gold company I would not be using current prices to assess it future earning power, I would use a much more conservative gold price,
Whats your point Tysonboss? Is yours Bernanke's position?
The most interesting thing is this, from the US constitution:
It is explicitly mentioned that gold and silver is money as far as the US is concerned as of inception. It is important information that the head of the US central bank does not recognize this. Indeed what Bernanke said in this video is an outright lie - the central bank does not hold gold 'out of tradition'. It holds gold because prior to 1971 gold was the monetary base - a situation terminated by their default. The fact that gold is no longer money in the US results from a crime - an outright theft and coercion of peoples gold out of their hands and into the possession of the state (FDR 1933, completed by Nixon 1971), and not from people willingly choosing bits of paper that are irredeemable (US notes) as money.
I guess 'because we stole it from you all' is not as politically palatable as 'its just there because of tradition'.
You make a lot of asumptions Tysonboss1 that never seem to stand up. A stock I am in, AYN, is factored at a silver price AUS$30. Its production cost is $14 which is underway now and looking forward to the report end of September that they are on target to meet projections. They have met all objectives so far and just await now for the re-rating that will soon come and a top up at that time.
Maybe its time to look past those financial advisers and make all of your own decisions.
How much does gold really cost a Central Bank that can create the money that it is purchased with?
This is why central banks tend to sell into lows and by into highs. It is not about profit or loss in the currency that they can create from nothing. It is about control... these guys will acquire all the gold they need when they really need it, at any price it happens to be. After all what does it cost to tack on a few extra zeros?
People tend to misunderstand central bank actions, they are not economic actors in the sense that the rest of us are.
Whats your point Tysonboss? Is yours Bernanke's position?
The most interesting thing is this, from the US constitution:
an outright theft and coercion of peoples gold out of their hands and into the possession of the state (FDR 1933, completed by Nixon 1971), and not from people willingly choosing bits of paper that are irredeemable (US notes) as money.
I guess 'because we stole it from you all' is not as politically palatable as 'its just there because of tradition'.
The is plenty of other commodities with better production cost/sale price dynamics.
True, but do you not think that the demand and increased possession of physical outside of the banking system will not bring about a day of reckoning ?
That the way the popular media obviously hates to even print the word gold is not a sign that it may be a problem ?
I doubt it given that the larger part of silver production is byproduct. That is the key to understanding silver, it is relatively supply inelastic.
I was making a direct comment in relation to explode $14 production cost to $30 sale price.
I was simply saying there is a whole bunch of other commodities will better ratio's.
Was not commenting on supply of silver.
Would be pleased if you would state them?
I believe that the AYN situation is conservative, given the current trends, the ratio and rising prices of both pm's. I expect by the end of September that silver will be well past $50 an ounce in both Aus and US. AYN is Australias only pure silver producer. CCU also a pure play will come into production later this year and is another to watch for.
One has to play safe to be sure, but one also has "to speculate to accumulate"
One has to play safe to be sure, but one also has "to speculate to accumulate"
I don't believe that at all, if you feel you have to gamble to get ahead, your doing it wrong.
I doubt it given that the larger part of silver production is byproduct. That is the key to understanding silver, it is relatively supply inelastic.
I think perhaps you are confused, or you didn't read the piece. 'make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts' - no part of this sentence indicates that they may produce the coins themselves (which was done privately or historically foreign coins were used such as Mexican/Spanish dollars). I'm not sure how the 'print dollars' came into this, the novel idea that a piece of paper can be a dollar results from the historical actions I described in my last post.That little piece you posted states the case clearly,
It says the state can not "coin money" so they cannot make money. However, the states can make gold and silver coins, so the constitution clearly distinguishes between "money" and "gold" the states can not print dollars,
Gold Price - Where is it heading - Anyone care to speculate now?
Cheers.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?