Below is just my thoughts guys..anyone want to read into it..I may be wrong because i'm no expert.
I feel they havnt made the announcements clear..a lot of people have become confused. I'm no oiler..but when you look at the comparisons they look good. They also said they had
"Gross sand over the log interval is approximately 860’ (247 m) with 69’ (21 m) of net gas saturated dolomitic sandstone with additional gas potential possible."
they also state
"Potential exists in other sands with gas shows in the well but, due to hole conditions, logs were not definitive."
They have only confirmed 69' from their 860 possible feet. That is very interesting. There will be more..then when you look at Lisbons field below.
The net pay of the Lisbon field is "Net Pay – 225 ft"
Now arent they very cheap if they have 69 feet of net gas..where Lisbon have 225 feet of net gas..and Lisbons field is 225 feet of net gas combined from 23 producing wells.
I feel they havnt made the announcements clear..a lot of people have become confused. I'm no oiler..but when you look at the comparisons they look good. They also said they had
"Gross sand over the log interval is approximately 860’ (247 m) with 69’ (21 m) of net gas saturated dolomitic sandstone with additional gas potential possible."
they also state
"Potential exists in other sands with gas shows in the well but, due to hole conditions, logs were not definitive."
They have only confirmed 69' from their 860 possible feet. That is very interesting. There will be more..then when you look at Lisbons field below.
The net pay of the Lisbon field is "Net Pay – 225 ft"
Now arent they very cheap if they have 69 feet of net gas..where Lisbon have 225 feet of net gas..and Lisbons field is 225 feet of net gas combined from 23 producing wells.