Logique
Investor
- Joined
- 18 April 2007
- Posts
- 4,290
- Reactions
- 768
Er..no it isn't. I'm not the one trying to change the constitution.I think its up to you then to provide valid reasons why the marriage act shouldn't be extended to include same sex couples.
Er..no it isn't. I'm not the one trying to change the constitution.
No, that is rubbish Syd. Do what you like in private but remember that homosexuals are about 5% of the population, so you can't expect the rest of us to like what you do. If you want to see homosexual acts on TV, start your own tv station or lobby SBS to show them
The interracial marriage argument is a straw man. It's natural for a man and women of any race to mate and produce children, but two men cannot neither can two women. I don't see how a person of your intelligence can be blind to that reality.
You may note that I said it doesn't bother me if two same sex consenting adults get married, but leave unconsenting children out of these relationships.
If you were a child who experienced deep love from his parents, consider your parents as always being functional and to this day can only experience deep love and gratitude for his parents and you were not abused in anyway by anybody nor subjected to some environmental exposure or exposure to sexual situations or pornography that a child should not be subjected to then I concede that your being born gay was a natural event.
I will never ever however concede that a childs rights are a secondary issue but rather assert that they should be the highest issue. I am surprised however that you have this opinion and it leaves me curious and baffled?
Plenty of people saw interracial marriages as unnatural, against the natural order. Just look to apartheid south africa or the southern states in the USA.
Your sprouting the same kinds of bigotry. if you're offended at a gay couple's publis display of affection, that says more about your lack of empathy that it does about the couple.
I don't care if you like what we do, though our lives are generally the same as yours. I work, pay my taxes, laugh, cry just like you do. You're basically saying homosexuals should be invisible. That's how you'd like us to be??
What are you doing about unconsenting children from being brought into the world in loveless marriages, unconsenting children born into families that cannot financially support them? That's a far bigger issue.
Er..no it isn't. I'm not the one trying to change the constitution.
Some people may have, not me. I don't care who people hitch up with as long as they don't make a song and dance about it.
Are you suggesting they shouldnt be allowed to celebrate, just because they have a different sexuality to you?
As I said, I don't care what people do in private I don't care to watch it on TV, and that includes heterosexual sex which has been devalued by the rampant spread of pornography.
Thats easy, change channels. As a straight guy I have really enjoyed some gay TV, "Queer as Folk" is one that I still remember as great TV. Not sure how sex is devalued by pornography, but agian no one forces you to watch it
Not at all, I can get along with most people in the normal course of events, I just don't need to be dragged into their bedrooms.
I got news for you, gay people dont want you in their bedroom!
Yes, they are big issues which need to be addressed, but they don't justify the deliberate deprivation of children by forcing them to be brought up in an environment that goes against their natural instincts.
View attachment 63218
Since when are laws changed to make people feel better, that is not the purpose of Marriage....
View attachment 63218
Since when are laws changed to make people feel better, that is not the purpose of Marriage.
The children come first.
View attachment 63218
Since when are laws changed to make people feel better, that is not the purpose of Marriage.
The children come first.
.
You don't think that over population is not a major issue? How many more people do you think the planet can sustainably support? Besides China no country has actually consciously tried to limit their population. Uncontrolled population growth like we currently have is more likely to do children harm than gay marriage.
I cant see how my sister's children have been 'deliberatley deprived" of anything, nor do I see anything in their lives that goes against their "natural instincts". I do know plenty of kids in straight families that have much worse parenting.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?