- Joined
- 30 June 2008
- Posts
- 15,663
- Reactions
- 7,514
Is that a threat ?
Ah yes, and basilio is your real name isnt it.
And for the record my name is a matter of public record here and Ill tell it to anyone who wants to know.
Have you got the the cajones tough boy?
And oh yes, Karma. It's a real bitch Mr Anonymous, Mr "smear and not debate".
It's going to get really interesting who that bus ultimately runs over. I can't wait.
Oh please.Is that a threat ?
Threats are for the left basilio. I leave the karma bus to its own device. I will merely be an interested observer.Or is that a "threat" ?
Or just the normal fun comments we make on this lovely, warm, pleasant little forum.
Oh please.
It is an invitation to you, in light of your pedagogery regarding Tommy's real name, to reveal your real name.
You know, to mitigate your monumental hypocrisy.
I think it's a racist, homophobic, fascist threat.Or is that a "threat" ?
Or just the normal fun comments we make on this lovely, warm, pleasant little forum.
Is that a threat ?
I think the basilio is actually Cathy Newman.Nah. Just don't buy it Wayne. Just... not... true.
I've heard a thousand snide comments from school bullies intended to put the frighteners on their next pet project (true !) to recognise menace when I hear it.
I think the basilio is actually Cathy Newman.
She is a only person I've seen to do transparently and shamelessly transmogrify a perfectly innocent comment into a perfectly ludicrous smear not related to the original comment.
Actually, no, they all do that don't they?
a perfectly innocent comment
Can someone clarify the actual law of media and law cases. I know certain cases have media gag orders to prevent the victim being identified. But there are plenty of cases where the media chase those accused while at trial.Yep . "But I ain't said Nuthing Sir. Ya can't prove anthink. "
Wrap it up will you Wayne. "Tommy Robinson" is a very public figure with a cause to push. I can totally understand the use of a different, more "English" name than Stephem Laxley-Lennon. Lots of people in the public eye create new names to assist heir image.
But Stephen/Tommys desire to be a public figure has nothing to do with my or anyone elses privacy on this forum. Trying to bait or insult me because I won't expose myself here is not on.
The issue of the conversation was whether Tommy was being denied his freedom of speech by interviewing defendents in a trial for Face Book while the trial was still in progress. The facts are "Freedom of Speech" is not absolute or sacrostant. The Judiciary system says clearly the rights of people to a fair trial take precedence while the trail is progress. Tommy has already had a run in for attempting to undermine that right in a previous trial. He has done it again and the court has said "enough is enough", he is in contempt of court and this is the penalty.
But there are plenty of cases where the media chase those accused while at trial.
Can someone clarify the actual law of media and law cases. I know certain cases have media gag orders to prevent the victim being identified. But there are plenty of cases where the media chase those accused while at trial.
Wouldn't the chasing and outing of Harvey Weinstein in the media prejudice the case?
Or will that be judge not jury?
Oh dear,Yep . "But I ain't said Nuthing Sir. Ya can't prove anthink. "
Wrap it up will you Wayne. "Tommy Robinson" is a very public figure with a cause to push. I can totally understand the use of a different, more "English" name than Stephem Laxley-Lennon. Lots of people in the public eye create new names to assist heir image.
But Stephen/Tommys desire to be a public figure has nothing to do with my or anyone elses privacy on this forum. Trying to bait or insult me because I won't expose myself here is not on.
The issue of the conversation was whether Tommy was being denied his freedom of speech by interviewing defendents in a trial for Face Book while the trial was still in progress. The facts are "Freedom of Speech" is not absolute or sacrostant. The Judiciary system says clearly the rights of people to a fair trial take precedence while the trail is progress. Tommy has already had a run in for attempting to undermine that right in a previous trial. He has done it again and the court has said "enough is enough", he is in contempt of court and this is the penalty.
I will perform my own analysis when everything is known thank you (with the help of some pretty high brow legal opinion)Why not check out this analysis on the contempt of court charge against Tommy ?
Don't call it censorship when Islam critic's simply in contempt of court
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/...contempt-of-court/.../680754cc4a98167fa75ba4afcf...
2 days ago - “Why aren't you defending Tommy Robinson?” asked many readers last weekend. The answer is simple: sometimes this British political activist ...
This is one of the many "irregularities" my retired qc friend mentioned. This makes the magistrate both witness and judicial. This is problematic.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?