Garpal Gumnut
Ross Island Hotel
- Joined
- 2 January 2006
- Posts
- 13,698
- Reactions
- 10,313
Quite a good article for the constipated commenters on FMG and off topic matters on ASF.
Basically a summary of my thoughts on Twiggy Forrest's attempts to be a new age Renewable guru and run an Iron Ore company at the same time.
The turnover of executives of supposed high quality is quite high at FFI, the Hydrogen arm of FMG.
The Chinese Circus looks like it will not be opening for any New Year over the next 12 months.
Whither FMG ?
Behind Fortescue’s executive revolving door
In the cult of Andrew Forrest not all disciples who sign on can operate under this messianic leader or within its governance structure.www.brisbanetimes.com.au
gg
So he has constructed FFI, financed it through FMG and is driving it relentlessly to achieve what most observers would say is an impossible outcome.
I believe the reason behind executives and key people leaving is that they are expected to follow Twiggy's brainfarts and are unable to have their feedback acknowledged.Yeah . No surprises in Elizabeth Knights discussion re Twiggys dominant role in FMG/FFI.
Twiggy owns 37% of FMG. He also drives it's operations and direction. He pushes his staff to extremes and exhaustion. It is pretty autocratic.
The new (additional...) direction of FMG is pure Twiggy. IMV it is largely driven by his view that unless Carbon emissions are dramatically reduced CC will effectively destroy our current society. Some people might think that is extreme. However almost every climate scientist would concur. Twiggy has this knowledge in his knapsack.
He sees "his" FMG as having the capacity and financial self interest to make a radical contribution to reducing carbon emissions in heavy industry. So he has constructed FFI, financed it through FMG and is driving it relentlessly to achieve what most observers would say is an impossible outcome.
This discussion has been made many times on this thread. FMG will gain substantial return on investment and value from reducing fossil fuel costs. Achieving the bigger objectives will take enormous energy and some very calculated technological decisions. Finding and holding the management team to make this happen could well be the Achilles heel of the project. I sincerely hope Twiggy gets the balance right. But boldness, vision and money are big drivers.
Having said that I think the iron ore operations will still power on and continue to make FMG a profitable concern. As they must. Hopefully there will still be sufficient oversight of these operations to ensure the best commercial outcome.
After almost 70 years I have given up on saying what can't be done. Probably they most powerful experience I have had as a teacher was working with Year 4 students, - 10 year olds, who didn't know what "couldn't be done" in their school - and then just did it.I believe the reason behind executives and key people leaving is that they are expected to follow Twiggy's brainfarts and are unable to have their feedback acknowledged.
I have spoken to many engineers who say Hydrogen is a no go.
The people leaving are high quality talent who may see that the writing is on the wall for Hydrogen as an alternative fuel and that it is all Mickey Mouse, in deference to @Value Collector.
I'm not trying to pour Olive Oyle on your expectations of Twiggy @basilio but it is a fairly big bet he is making in an unforgiving casino.
gg
.
I'm not trying to pour Olive Oyle on your expectations of Twiggy @basilio but it is a fairly big bet he is making in an unforgiving casino.
gg
, I mean there is multi pathways they are exploring to monetise the hydrogen.
I agree with you VC, if global warming is being caused by carbon emissions, eventually H2 and nuclear will have to do the heavy lifting, so it isn't unreasonable to think that FFI will eventually be a major contributor to FMG's bottom line.I don’t think it is as big of a gamble as you would imagine.
Only 10% of their profits are dedicated to FFI, so that alone makes it a minor bet. But then you have the fact that of that 10% a chunk of it is being used just to build solar and wind power generation which is low risk stuff that even if the hydrogen never works will still be valuable. Then you have the conversion of diesel equipment to battery electric that’s pretty low risk too.
It’s only really the final stage which is producing the hydrogen that could be considered risky, but even parts of that plan is not super high risk, I mean there is multi pathways they are exploring to monetise the hydrogen.
But as I said even if hydrogen plan doesn’t work we get left with a bunch of renewable electricity generation and batteries.
I just realised there is another potential pathway to consume hydrogen that is very important in WA.
Hydrogen in the form of Ammonium Nitrate is a main ingredient in explosives, and The mining and quarrying industry consumes a lot of explosives in WA. There an already Ammonium Nitrate plants in WA that produce 100’s of thousands of tonnes of Ammonia for the explosive market (and over 1 Million tonnes for fertiliser exports).
With WA’s large Iron ore, Gold and nickel mining SA’s copper mines and both states future growth in Battery minerals mining there is a large steady demand for explosives.
The fertiliser and explosives markets will probably be interested in moving to green hydrogen too.
I agree with you VC, if global warming is being caused by carbon emissions, eventually H2 and nuclear will have to do the heavy lifting, so it isn't unreasonable to think that FFI will eventually be a major contributor to FMG's bottom line.
Being a one trick pony, relying solely on iron ore, is a riskier route to take IMO.
The world is changing at a hell of a pace and not thinking outside the box, is leaving a lot of companies stranded.
The legacy car companies are a current example of it, last generation Nokia and Kodak were examples of companies that dug in and tried to ride out the change.
Adapting to change, is a far less risky strategy, than hoping things will stay the same.
Twiggy leading the charge, will get a lot of opportunities/subsidies and joint ventures, that wont be available at a later date.
Somewhat like early adopters of rooftop solar, many said it was a waste of money, well after 12 years I can tell you it wasn't.
i got mine ( target price )Yea Gone way above my target price..
Put an extra dollar on it. will reevaluate tomorrow I guess.
There are some interesting smaller players.i got mine ( target price )
i am GONE
i invested in a iron miner not to throw cash all around the world for various agendas
That is interesting. I was under the impression that you valued FMG for its iron ore mining and the probability of ongoing $2 a year dividends from your investment in it.i got mine ( target price )
i am GONE
i invested in a iron miner not to throw cash all around the world for various agendas
yes i WAS , but am seeing all these peripheral investments and partnerships , in a market of increasing uncertainty ( for instance we look like we are heading for a substantial trade war with China )That is interesting. I was under the impression that you valued FMG for its iron ore mining and the probability of ongoing $2 a year dividends from your investment in it.
I thought you saw the small(10%) portion of its profits that were used to seed FFI as an exercise in developing a new arm to their business. But that as long as the iron ore component stayed effective and profitable you would keep getting the cheques.
Was I mistaken or have you changed your view on entire operation ?
Well you certainly made a dollar on your deal. I can recognise your concerns and yes if one believed the whole world economy was facing a grim future I struggle to see what stock investments would make sense.yes i WAS , but am seeing all these peripheral investments and partnerships , in a market of increasing uncertainty ( for instance we look like we are heading for a substantial trade war with China )
i might be wrong in my move just like when i held MTS and left in a hurry
if this was ( similar ) to March 2020 and the market was deciding between a bottom and another leg down .. i would have only reduced
but this feels ( to me ) like climbing a wall of worry
i see a government starting to behave like that of current Germany i would rather have exited VUK as well but probably won't get near the target
i still hold GRR and MGX ( as well as BHP ) as iron exposure
but i feel an ill wind coming ( just like January 2020 )
now best of luck to Twiggy and the holders , but it looks like i will have to spend most of Christmas looking for alternative investments ( and targets )
one of my flaws ( strengths ?? ) i can be very fickle ( at unusual times )Well you certainly made a dollar on your deal. I can recognise your concerns and yes if one believed the whole world economy was facing a grim future I struggle to see what stock investments would make sense.
I have to say I am very split. I suppose I believe that my few investments represent areas that will be required, are well run (I hope) and forward looking. Taking FMG in particular IMV if iron ore prices and sales volume fell to the point that it was unprofitable then Australia as a whole would be an absolute disaster. Such a scenario would be reflected across the whole mining sector and would result in the undermining of a huge part of our national income.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?