- Joined
- 20 July 2021
- Posts
- 11,849
- Reactions
- 16,513
but what is the talent pool like in 'green energy ' maybe one of the previous CEOs could improve their skill-set , after all FMG is no tiny company even now , wouldn't know the current company well but ready to learn more be a good fit as well
this isn't like starting to chase gold production and poaching an exec from Newmont or Barrick , 'green energy ' is a very steep learning curve as the area develops and morphs
From what I can gather FMG wants to develop the projects with its own mangement and workforce rather than pulling in outsiders.
Let me get this right, FMG are secretly turning Iron Ore miners into hydrogen engineers? Solar panel fitters? Ship builders?
Your comparison to Musk is laughable, normally i would let this type of drivel pass, but on this occasion i felt obliged to comment.
Forrest is a placeholder for the any hydrogen revolution. He is buying into companies that have technology and presumably the associated IP. He will then seek to leverage that to get first mover advantage when and if he finds customers for green hydrogen in this country.
Fortescue buys into Dutch energy tech business
Fortescue’s green hydrogen arm has bought a 60 per cent stake in Netherlands-based High yield Energy Technologies Group (HyET).www.businessnews.com.au
Fmg employs alot more people that simply Iron Ore miners, I think you are forgetting that FMG built their entire company from scratch, which included building massive amounts of infrastructure, including power plants, electric transmission systems, gas pipelines, processing plants, railways lines, ports, ships, airport, and many other parts.
This all takes a lot of skills which are transferable, not to mention the financing and deal making side of things which FMG has proved to be highly capable at.
But, also as has just been announced they are looking to employ some new top management with specialised skills in the area of renewables.
——————————-
watch the short interview at the 43.11 minute mark of this video, it only goes for 1 minute, and you will see that FMG does have a history of moving talent to different fields.
I think the energy developments directly related to their mining business should come from general capital expenditure, and the 10% figure should be what is but in as equity into the large stand alone businesses separate from the mining business.That analysis reflects the more nuanced approach I believe FMG is taking in this expansion of the companies operations.
FMG's iron ore projects are largely mature,. The most significant new development will be the magnetite project which hopefully comes on line end of 2023. In that context the company and shareholders can anticipate steady revenue streams for the foreseeable future. If iron ore prices stay around $100 a tonne then dividends should be around $2 per share a year.
Changes to the iron ore section of FMG will be in lower costs as a result of renewable energy replacing fossil fuels and associated maintenance costs in mining, cartage and transport to markets.
The development of whole new industries in hydrogen production, solar energy, re engineering of ships, trains and other transport will require much new talent and capital. It will be interesting to see if they decide to increase the current 10% allocation net profits to FFI. Might be cleverer to just absorb some FFI capital works into the overall capital expenditure costs.
That analysis reflects the more nuanced approach I believe FMG is taking in this expansion of the companies operations.
FMG's iron ore projects are largely mature,. The most significant new development will be the magnetite project which hopefully comes on line end of 2023. In that context the company and shareholders can anticipate steady revenue streams for the foreseeable future. If iron ore prices stay around $100 a tonne then dividends should be around $2 per share a year.
Changes to the iron ore section of FMG will be in lower costs as a result of renewable energy replacing fossil fuels and associated maintenance costs in mining, cartage and transport to markets.
The development of whole new industries in hydrogen production, solar energy, re engineering of ships, trains and other transport will require much new talent and capital. It will be interesting to see if they decide to increase the current 10% allocation net profits to FFI. Might be cleverer to just absorb some FFI capital works into the overall capital expenditure costs.
Fmg are currently building a hybrid electricity system in the Pilbara to run their mines, because lowering their energy costs has been a consistent goal for them.yes $2 a year in divs is what i calculated when buying into FMG and the iron ore projects are mature rather than aging , so iron price should be a more immediate concern than mine life
am not sure the renewable energy will REDUCE costs ( only those harvesting hydro energy not wave ) have been good for me investment wise , but let's say resist increasing costs in traditional supplies , because FMG will still have to put plenty into R&D
another possible issue is will future government cut down on R&D tax breaks ( there is a LOT of money already loaded onto future taxpayers , and without migration our population is shrinking )
FMG has delivered ambitious plans before but boy-o-boy going forward there is a lot of uncertainty ahead ( even the global benchmark currency is under pressure )
It depends on how much carbon tax is added to 'dirty' steel, the EU is pushing for a universal carbon tax, it looks as though the U.S will follow suit.But why would it be game changer? Stop for a sec.we can already buy lower emission greener steel from non China origin, but their dirty cheaper steel has and is still closing steel mills everywhere.
Unless cheaper, steel is steel..and whatever the green economy dreams of, the market for steel remains in China, India and developing countries.
So will H2 steel be cheaper?
That is the only question
What is needed for a Green Energy CEO is someone who is void of scientific understanding or willing to ignore it and still look themselves in the mirror and preach the lie to take in government money.but what is the talent pool like in 'green energy ' maybe one of the previous CEOs could improve their skill-set , after all FMG is no tiny company even now , wouldn't know the current company well but ready to learn more be a good fit as well
this isn't like starting to chase gold production and poaching an exec from Newmont or Barrick , 'green energy ' is a very steep learning curve as the area develops and morphs
WOW !!What is needed for a Green Energy CEO is someone who is void of scientific understanding or willing to ignore it and still look themselves in the mirror and preach the lie to take in government money.
Unfortunately, Elizabeth Gaines is not one of them...WOW !!
that could be a long line of candidates , but would Twiggy be OK with that ( some other boards would be fine and only need to search internally )
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?