- Joined
- 30 June 2008
- Posts
- 15,659
- Reactions
- 7,512
It is certainly true that I and many other FMG holders could have sold out at $22-23-24 and bought back in at current prices. Would have absolutely made a mint.
Was it possible to predict such a scenario? Maybe.. Always easier in hindsight I think.
One of the ways stock market gurus try to persuade punters to sign up is to run the argument that they can pick highs and lows and then produce graphs to show just how that could have been achieved.
But always in hindsight.
Thanks for the reply AG
I can see that that can have a bearing and its
not possible unless in hindsight to be certain that
your going to see a 50% fall. Even so Holding for
Dividend and tax discount can be very expensive
In my example above Selling at $23 and buying at
$14.20 you get another another 620 Shares and
their dividends/ 1000 V buying at $10 and still holding
That's a lot of tax to the market!
Yes if it works its great but for example last year around this time I bought a parcel at around 18 then China put up that fake Photoshop picture of a Australian soldier killing a Afghan child and it was the end of the world, everybody panicked I sold out at 19... we were back at 20+ in a few weeks. Id be pissed if I lost my cgt discount and jumped back higher then I sold
I may have fluked it but Im just a builder---no guru.
and it wasn't in hindsight. Im only making a point nothing more
in the hope that in the future some may consider it. Particularly when there is and
was a very good fundamental reason for FMG to come off hard---Iron Ore price.
Pulled my degen order. Here's why:
View attachment 130525
China: massacre
Iron ore: even bigger massacre
XAO: massacre
sp500 futures: the best of a bad bunch, but still horrific
Yank futures have been dropping precipitously all day and are still going, and the XAO looks like closing at session lows:
View attachment 130528
Everyone are bricking it. We're very nearly at panic point. This will probably hit the normie news tonight and all the new normie day traders that got their ends wet/made some easy cash in the pandemic sht themselves and panic sell tomorrow and/or for the rest of the week.
Looks like my monday bloodbath call over the weekend was at least accurate.
I agree with you, don't think materials turn around really quickly, so the ore price has to stop going down first.Closed sightly up from the 14.20 bottom, is this the dead cat bounce techa mentioned? I feel like late in the week will be more knifes to lose fingers on
Im wrong as I was buying back into stock late Friday.
Yep, that's what crashes are...Market overreaction
Market overreaction to some instabilities in China but which are not related to iron ore directly. collected around $6 worth of divs over the years. Unless the iron ore / steel market will collapse - we will be fine.
Agreed RE: thesis that iron will still be required. The US is already planning massive infrastructure spending and given the newly formed AUKUS triad, may look upon Australian iron ore movers favorably. Although I don't go happen anytime soon.I think we could easily see a continuing drop in iron ore prices as Evergrande unwinds and there is an immediate impact on the construction industry in China. The next question will be "what will be the real demand for steel in China and around the world "? In the end we still need steel and iron ore. It will come back to best value producers and marketing connections with buyers.
One of FMG's skills is directly dealing with Chinese steel mills to make iron ore mixes specifically for their needs. (It's possible other companies have similar relationships. )
It does come back to the dollars. At $100 a ton FMG is still very profitable. VC calculated earlier that selling ore at $60 a ton would yield 69c dividend per share. At $14 a share that is a 5% yield. Not brilliant but not shabby.
Dividends would be around $0.69 if Iron Ore averaged $60 for 12 months. post 3714
They have been working on Thorium Reactors and such for over 50 years.It is a bit off topic, but with nuclear, they are working on thorium reactors and nuclear fusion.
Renewables are currently more expensive than fossil fuels unless the government is involved.... That is one of the reasons China is kicking the rest of the worlds buttocksFMG and twiggy are doing a great job, especially with regard trying to diversify into renewables, it should eventually improve their bottom line as fuel is a big cost.
As for tax, I doubt FMG are taxed any differently than BHP, Rio or any other miner.
The thing is, it is always difficult to get into the big league it costs a huge amount of money, but FMG has got there.
Now the trick is to become a diversified miner, rather than a one trick pony.
Only selling one commodity, when it cycles, so do you.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?