- Joined
- 29 January 2006
- Posts
- 7,217
- Reactions
- 4,439
You need to make fewer assumptions than you do, and you might become more credible.BTW, it has taken Red over a week and 40 posts to find some figures and start to read some economics literature....he mentioned an economics term today for the first time - BoP....but BoP doesn't disclose the nitty gritty details Red....
As can be seen from the below chart, refugee/humanitarian intakes have almost halved as a proportion of the total migrant intake over the past 10 years. These same 10 years were very prosperous for our nation.
My position is that we can afford to do better. Moreover, I consider it inappropriate for us to actually profit from migration on an ongoing basis, which is suggested by the data.
I don't like liars, cheats, or willful lawbreakers.
You have already proven yourself in this thread.
.
You need to make fewer assumptions than you do, and you might become more credible.
I have been more than happy for you to present a cogent case. As the thread progressed, I became equally happy for you to degenerate, as you did.
Each time you get caught out you change the rules.
What I said at the outset, and have continued to say throughout, is now shown through tonight's posts to be a fair approach to the migration issue.
By the way, when you rethink post 245 you might realise the massive miscalculation you made (post 250) - quite unforgivable actually, although I will concede to you some humanity.
Tabled below is a selection of countries accepting more refugees than Australia (data sourced from UNHCR statistics):
hehehehehe ....Poppyscock......this is what you said at the outset....
… Most refugees continue to be accepted into countries which can least afford to support them.
….
As can be seen from the below chart, refugee/humanitarian intakes have almost halved as a proportion of the total migrant intake over the past 10 years. These same 10 years were very prosperous for our nation.
My position is that we can afford to do better. Moreover, I consider it inappropriate for us to actually profit from migration on an ongoing basis, which is suggested by the data.
Tabled below is a selection of countries accepting more refugees than Australia (data sourced from UNHCR statistics):
Keep up the good work Red. You make some sense.
gg
...still resonates.Unfortunately we here have many empty vessels making a lot of noise...
helicart
I put a challenge to you that remains unmet.
...still resonates.
I have defended most of the points I raised.Come on Red, that's the defence you use when you don't want to meet the challenge of the questions I have thrown at you time and again.....
I have defended most of the points I raised.
I could have done a better job on "crime" if better data existed - but it doesn't.
When you show an ability to defend what you you spruik, we might then be able to move on to other questions of relevance.
It's your opinion.Would you care to comment Red on my criticism of your table of states which take more migrants than Australia?
gg
That's pretty scary stuff. Immigration controls have been very lax. Things will change however when Islam takes control in Europe. No more infidels will be allowed in.
We just have to make sure it does not take control here.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?