Really?Anyway, on to less tiresome topics:
I did miss the leaders debate tonight, media seems to be calling it a bit of a draw really.
Any opinions from those who actually watch it?
Striking a police horse at an unlawful protest where the moron refused to move on has no "nuance".Rederob, as per usual, seeks to misrepresent the nuance of his opponent's position.
You should look at your earlier postThis is typical of the disingenuity(sic) and mendacity of the leftist position.
as your hypocrisy is nothing short of disingenuous. Nicely followed by another example of yours below:I think it's high time that everybody stops categorising those on the absolute extremes, as representative of everybody on that side of the spectrum.
Need I say more!And just so that we are clear, yes I am calling you a f****** liar.
I think it highlights Australias need for a bill of rights.Striking a police horse at an unlawful protest where the moron refused to move on has no "nuance".
You should look at your earlier post
as your hypocrisy is nothing short of disingenuous. Nicely followed by another example of yours below:
Need I say more!
So let's recap:
On 24 July you posted one of your many tweets suggesting this incident was fake news.
A follow-up comment of yours stated "Fake news (eg the horse punch) is du rigeur."
You eventually offered an MSM video clearly showing "Tobruk" was struck, but saying "it was the whimpiest punch ever recorded in the last 500 years."
I was implored to watch the video evidence, which is interesting as I had referenced it and showed the evidence police and State Prosecutors relied on to make the case. As I am simply mirroring the claim of the State, based on the evidence we all have, my position is in fact the same as that of the officer riding Tobruk, who we can reasonably assume @wayneL would also call "f****** liar"
Yes, there were the typical unintelligible comments from @cynic, and suggestions it was not really a "punch." But the earlier suggestion that it was a push preventing Mr Free Speech from being trampled is as bogus as fake news gets. I showed an instance of a push in a similar circumstance and it clearly shows an open palm against the horse, which is the natural, instinctive defence against a horse you would fear trampling you. Everything Mr Free Speech did was wrong and aggressive rather than defensive.
@wayneL would have us believe he knows more about the law than the State, yet offers no evidence to suggest this is credible. And rather than argue the State's case against Mr Free Speech @wayneL reverts to type and plays the man, as they say in the vernacular.
Striking a police horse at an unlawful protest where the moron refused to move on has no "nuance".
You should look at your earlier post
as your hypocrisy is nothing short of disingenuous. Nicely followed by another example of yours below:
Need I say more!
So let's recap:
On 24 July you posted one of your many tweets suggesting this incident was fake news.
A follow-up comment of yours stated "Fake news (eg the horse punch) is du rigeur."
You eventually offered an MSM video clearly showing "Tobruk" was struck, but saying "it was the whimpiest punch ever recorded in the last 500 years."
I was implored to watch the video evidence, which is interesting as I had referenced it and showed the evidence police and State Prosecutors relied on to make the case. As I am simply mirroring the claim of the State, based on the evidence we all have, my position is in fact the same as that of the officer riding Tobruk, who we can reasonably assume @wayneL would also call "f****** liar"
Yes, there were the typical unintelligible comments from @cynic, and suggestions it was not really a "punch." But the earlier suggestion that it was a push preventing Mr Free Speech from being trampled is as bogus as fake news gets. I showed an instance of a push in a similar circumstance and it clearly shows an open palm against the horse, which is the natural, instinctive defence against a horse you would fear trampling you. Everything Mr Free Speech did was wrong and aggressive rather than defensive.
@wayneL would have us believe he knows more about the law than the State, yet offers no evidence to suggest this is credible. And rather than argue the State's case against Mr Free Speech @wayneL reverts to type and plays the man, as they say in the vernacular.
The Prosecution dropped the animal cruelty charges as the moron pleaded guilty to breaching public health orders.
Time always outs.
And why do ya reckon that might be?The Prosecution dropped the animal cruelty charges as the moron pleaded guilty to breaching public health orders.
So the contentious charges were never tested in court.
The one thing that wont happen, is the havenots wont be targeted, the daughter when she lived on her own was broken into, they didn't take anything.
Consequences. They exist.No mucking around with the UK Government on the rioters and social media terrorists in Britain.
Caught, tried and sentenced in swift time
People who threw stones, hurled racist abuse and pushed a burning wheelie bin at police also sent to prison
Jessica Murray, Rajeev Syal and agencies
Fri 9 Aug 2024 13.35 EDTLast modified on Fri 9 Aug 2024 23.06 EDT
Two men jailed for social media posts that stirred up far-right violence
View attachment 182339
Two men have been sent to prison for stirring up hatred and violence online after the Southport attack, in the first cases of their kind linked to the recent riots seen across the country.
Jordan Parlour, 28, was jailed for 20 months after pleading guilty to inciting racial hatred with Facebook posts in which he advocated an attack on a hotel in Leeds as part of the violent public disorder that swept England last week.
In Northampton, Tyler Kay, 26, was given three years and two months in prison for posts on X that called for mass deportation and for people to set fire to hotels housing asylum seekers.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/aug/09/uk-far-right-riots-elon-musk-x
They are the first people to be charged for posting criminal messages online linked to the recent far-right violence.
Parlour’s post said: “Every man and their dog should be smashing [the] **** out [of] Britannia hotel.” More than 200 refugees and asylum seekers lived at the hotel. The initial post received six likes, but could be forwarded more widely owing to Parlour’s privacy settings.
Passing sentence on Friday, the judge, Guy Kearl KC, accepted Parlour took no part in the violence but said: “There can be no doubt you were inciting others to do so.
“You went on to say that you did not want your money going to immigrants who ‘rape our kids and get priority’,” Kearl said. “You were encouraging others to attack a hotel which you knew was occupied by refugees and asylum seekers.”
Two men jailed for social media posts that stirred up far-right violence
People who threw stones, hurled racist abuse and pushed a burning wheelie bin at police also sent to prisonwww.theguardian.com
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?