Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

EDE - Eden Innovations

All depends on what 'sorted' means.
Did not meet rule 3 for inclusion.
Three full trading days late to meet entry requirements.
Entrant acknowledges this.
Entry is still in the competition.
Not sure what the point of having rules is ...... if rules do not have to be met.

If you are feeling guilty I'll swap you for AFR. It's down 21+%.

Guilt after shame is one of the worst emotions.

Check with Joe.

gg
 
All depends on what 'sorted' means.
Did not meet rule 3 for inclusion.
Three full trading days late to meet entry requirements.
Entrant acknowledges this.
Entry is still in the competition.
Not sure what the point of having rules is ...... if rules do not have to be met.
That... just sounds a bit harsh to me.

I tipped this in the yearly comp and given my spot there I need at least another 500% :)
 
Totally agree with you that my entry did meet the eligibility requirements ....
 
Totally agree with you that my entry did meet the eligibility requirements ....
#MeToo
was all pretty simples .... Up to old mate and the administrators to work out what happens when entries do not meet the rules .... unless the message that some would argue is that the rules do not matter and do not have to be met?
 
#MeToo
was all pretty simples .... Up to old mate and the administrators to work out what happens when entries do not meet the rules .... unless the message that some would argue is that the rules do not matter and do not have to be met?
I would argue the entry in question should be allowed to continue given the motive of those rules, the common sense element, the history of the poster in question and that ASF isn't a police state.
 
I would argue the entry in question should be allowed to continue given the motive of those rules, the common sense element, the history of the poster in question and that ASF isn't a police state.
the great irony here being .......
If one chooses to ignore all of the existing rules then it can be argued that one is totally choosing their own destiny.
 
All depends on what 'sorted' means.
Did not meet rule 3 for inclusion.
Three full trading days late to meet entry requirements.
Entrant acknowledges this.
Entry is still in the competition.
Not sure what the point of having rules is ...... if rules do not have to be met.

Mmmm, ok, I may have misinterpreted this scenario ……. Its a potential grey area @HelloU as @jbocker has posted on the EDE thread previously, although by the letter of the law I suspect you may be technically correct …. I am inclined to be forgiving in these circumstances, but over to @Joe Blow on this one:notworthy::inpain:
 
the great irony here being .......
If one chooses to ignore all of the existing rules then it can be argued that one is totally choosing their own destiny.
If that was true then I await with fervent anticipation over how much control you have over EDE reaching my required 500% :)
 
OK I misinterpreted the rules I put my reasons in with my entry, and not on the thread. My response was NOT 3 days late, it was only put in to thank GGs tipping compliment, otherwise I would NOT have entered anything.
I don't know if and when the rule to put a 'reason' on thread came about, it could have been there a long time. I have always done it solely on the tipping thread. I picked EDE last month with no mention on the thread and it drew NO protest. I guess you need to get on top of the ladder to be noticed.

So technically I gave my reason for the tip just not in the right thread. Happy to be disqualified if that should appease people, and if I should still be on top at the end of month, and judged a winner I will donate the prize to a charity.

Keep it fun. I am sure that is the intention of the competition.
 
I am inclined to be forgiving in these circumstances, but over to @Joe Blow on this one:notworthy::inpain:

So technically I gave my reason for the tip just not in the right thread. Happy to be disqualified if that should appease people, and if I should still be on top at the end of month, and judged a winner I will donate the prize to a charity.

Keep it fun. I am sure that is the intention of the competition.

No need for a disqualification. @jbocker did post in the EDE thread on 3 October and although that was well before he entered, I'm finding that some competition entrants are posting their entry in the competition thread after they have posted in the thread of the stock they intend to enter. I still think that's in the spirit of the rule.

The idea behind the new rule is simply to get more posts in stock threads, and it seems to be achieving that goal, so I'm happy to be a little flexible in the first few months until everyone gets used to it.
 
Great report released today from MARTA. Some of the significant points I had not realised before was the range of benefits Edencrete gained against many other additives that were not only much more expensive, but required significant manual labour to add to the mixes, with many hazards, and with only targeted improvements. Edencrete additive is a solution replacing some of the water, which I would suggest mixes throughout the concrete much more consistently.
Additionally the permeability of Edencrete is far more resistant than normal concrete, to the point where the reinforcement steel is not reached by permeating solutions which infers minimal risks of corrosion.
Worth a read
https://research.onlineinvesting.we...3NjUtME9ITktJSkNNRko3SEJLQ1ZOQkVTRkFRUFIifQ==
 
Well the real news finally comes out.
EDE announces a report from MARTA which endorses Edencrete. It's 2 year study conducted by the
the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA)

The field trial commenced on 12th May 2016 (see Eden announcement ASX: EDE 16th May
2016). MARTA evaluated, over two years, the performance of EdenCrete® in concrete placed
in a section of the fleet parking area identified by MARTA to receive the most aggressive, inservice
conditions from turning, stopping, and parking of buses and other vehicles.
The field trial was to test the ability of EdenCrete® to improve a number of performance
characteristics including the concrete’s resistance to abrasive tyre wear, scaling from de-icer
chemicals, and reduction of cracking. When combined, these characteristics provide concrete
with a more effective defence against the ingress of moisture and chlorides and significantly
greater durability and longevity
.

I think this is seriously good news for Eden. It is an independent long term test undertaken by an orgnaisation which will certainly use the products and will be a realistic benchmark for many other similar bodies.

Congratulations to all the insiders who got the nod on this report a couple of weeks ago.;) It would be so interesting to see who has been buying up big (apart from the traders)

icon-pdf.png
MARTA Whitepaper Endorses Use of EdenCrete (PDF 2,000.9 KB)
 
I reckon...
that on the top of this recent sharp SP rise (ramp..) and the great news from MARTA Eden will go for another capital raising.

The Solomon boys are always on the look out for a fresh feed.:cautious:
 
ASX compliance staff also found it concerning that EDE shares have bolted in the past 2 weeks just prior to release of the (excellent) MARTA report.

The Solomon boys have spun their story with the usual fluff and eloquence.

I repeat. It would be exceptionally interesting to see who has gone into the market xalls deep in the past two weeks.

And it has happened before.

icon-pdf.png
Response to ASX Aware Letter (PDF 691.2 KB)
 
I repeat. It would be exceptionally interesting to see who has gone into the market xalls deep in the past two weeks.

I wish I had.
I have a fair swag compiled over the last year, averaging down as I compiled them. They are now sitting above my average cost today at 11c. So I am hoping this report gets pushed around to the engineers of similar installations and industry conferences by the MARTA engineers. :)
This report was a bonus for my tipping, I was punting on the Korean test results due within these few months.
 
Top