Kauri
E/W Learner
- Joined
- 3 September 2005
- Posts
- 3,428
- Reactions
- 11
1511/05
The Directors, company employees, consultants and contractors that have been involved in Deep Yellow’s exploration programme aimed at verifying about 4,000t of the reported 6,000t of U[/font][font=Arial,Arial]3[/font][font=Arial,Arial]O[/font][font=Arial,Arial]8 [/font][font=Arial,Arial]resources to a JORC (1999, 2000) Code reporting status are at a loss at this stage to explain this quantum discrepancy.
The full evaluation of the geochemical analyses was only completed yesterday (14 November) and the directors have had insufficient time to evaluate sources of possible error. To resolve this issue all facets of Deep Yellow’s work are being audited.
[/font]
NAPPERBY DRILLING DATA DISCREPANCY
[font=Arial,Arial]The Directors wish to advise that the resource calculations undertaken by Mineral Resource evaluation specialists, Hellman and Schofield on the assays from the recent drilling at Napperby are vastly different to those previously reported based on the information supplied by Paladin Resources Ltd, which in turn based its information on that gathered from 3 different drilling campaigns and a Pre-Feasibility Study carried out by Uranerz during its substantial evaluation of the project in the period 1977 to 1981.
The Directors, company employees, consultants and contractors that have been involved in Deep Yellow’s exploration programme aimed at verifying about 4,000t of the reported 6,000t of U[/font][font=Arial,Arial]3[/font][font=Arial,Arial]O[/font][font=Arial,Arial]8 [/font][font=Arial,Arial]resources to a JORC (1999, 2000) Code reporting status are at a loss at this stage to explain this quantum discrepancy.
The full evaluation of the geochemical analyses was only completed yesterday (14 November) and the directors have had insufficient time to evaluate sources of possible error. To resolve this issue all facets of Deep Yellow’s work are being audited.
[/font]