- Joined
- 20 July 2021
- Posts
- 11,972
- Reactions
- 16,667
having been offered a margin loan very early in my investing adventure ( by a group named in the Hayne Royal Commission ) i agree investing should be included in that hint1. Never trade or invest with money you can't afford to lose.
Like most worthwhile endeavours typically requires a level of upfront savings. Trading with savings you can "genuinely afford to lose" can help make the process less emotionally charged and, to some degree, more stress-free. However, this ideal scenario is rarely the reality for most. The crucial consideration is to ensure that savings allocated to trading do not jeopardise your financial stability or disrupt your current standard of living.
Point 1 I really don't agree with - in relation to investing as opposed to 'trading'. Most Australians begin investing from the first day of their first job via a Super Fund. You don't have to be an investment expert as the funds you invest in are run by professionals.
but lose they might .. bank foreclosure , forced resumption , fire , floodSimilarly, a lot of Australian buy investment houses - hardly something they 'can afford to lose'.
future investors should understand even bank/term deposits carry the risk of capital loss ( sure that percentage might be tiny , but it is there )So the statement about only investing money you can afford to lose implies pretty much no one should even start.
Initial capital | 100000.00 | 100000.00 | 100000.00 |
---|---|---|---|
Ending capital | 2481880.78 | 2481880.78 | 100000.00 |
Net Profit | 2381880.78 | 2381880.78 | 0.00 |
Net Profit % | 2381.88% | 2381.88% | 0.00% |
Exposure % | 42.99% | 42.99% | 0.00% |
Net Risk Adjusted Return % | 5540.68% | 5540.68% | -nan(ind)% |
Annual Return % | 14.64% | 14.64% | 0.00% |
Risk Adjusted Return % | 34.06% | 34.06% | -nan(ind)% |
Transaction costs | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
All trades | 152 | 152 (100.00 %) | 0 (0.00 %) |
Avg. Profit/Loss | 15670.27 | 15670.27 | -nan(ind) |
Avg. Profit/Loss % | 8.53% | 8.53% | -nan(ind)% |
Avg. Bars Held | 39.32 | 39.32 | -nan(ind) |
Winners | 82 (53.95 %) | 82 (53.95 %) | 0 (0.00 %) |
Total Profit | 4626704.76 | 4626704.76 | 0.00 |
Avg. Profit | 56423.23 | 56423.23 | -nan(ind) |
Avg. Profit % | 24.22% | 24.22% | -nan(ind)% |
Avg. Bars Held | 55.59 | 55.59 | -nan(ind) |
Max. Consecutive | 6 | 6 | 0 |
Largest win | 649199.04 | 649199.04 | 0.00 |
# bars in largest win | 149 | 149 | 0 |
Losers | 70 (46.05 %) | 70 (46.05 %) | 0 (0.00 %) |
Total Loss | -2244823.98 | -2244823.98 | 0.00 |
Avg. Loss | -32068.91 | -32068.91 | -nan(ind) |
Avg. Loss % | -9.85% | -9.85% | -nan(ind)% |
Avg. Bars Held | 20.27 | 20.27 | -nan(ind) |
Max. Consecutive | 5 | 5 | 0 |
Largest loss | -427077.91 | -427077.91 | 0.00 |
# bars in largest loss | 31 | 31 | 0 |
Max. trade drawdown | -542895.64 | -542895.64 | 0.00 |
Max. trade % drawdown | -35.71 | -35.71 | 0.00 |
Max. system drawdown | -747279.01 | -747279.01 | 0.00 |
Max. system % drawdown | -32.26% | -32.26% | 0.00% |
Recovery Factor | 3.19 | 3.19 | -nan(ind) |
CAR/MaxDD | 0.45 | 0.45 | -nan(ind) |
RAR/MaxDD | 1.06 | 1.06 | -nan(ind) |
Profit Factor | 2.06 | 2.06 | nan |
Payoff Ratio | 1.76 | 1.76 | nan |
Standard Error | 235767.41 | 235767.41 | 0.00 |
Risk-Reward Ratio | 0.52 | 0.52 | -nan(ind) |
Ulcer Index | 12.10 | 12.10 | 0.00 |
Ulcer Performance Index | 0.76 | 0.76 | -inf |
Sharpe Ratio of trades | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.00 |
K-Ratio | 0.05 | 0.05 | -nan(ind) |
Thank you kindly for your reminder Skate. this system has just recently being completed and it is just comprised of simple trail stop for exit. Still haven't been able to set aside time and got plenty more materials to read so no extra perks yet for this system. And obviously that links you gave will be tonight reading.Amibroker Backtesting Can Provide a Misleading Perspective
@bettamania, even the best trading software can give you a false sense of security, leading you to persist with a strategy when there may not actually be an edge or the edge has not been properly established. Backtesting is not the be-all and end-all, as it is not the only important factor in strategy development or evaluation. However, it can provide valuable insights into how a strategy might perform when traded live.
Backtesting Relies on Historical Data
To achieve meaningful results, it is crucial to approach backtesting thoughtfully. There are several important dos and don'ts to consider when interpreting the results.
One common pitfall is fooling yourself by backtesting with compounding
While it may look impressive on paper and help sell a strategy, it does not reflect real-world trading conditions. For example, if you backtested a strategy with a starting balance of $100,000 and position sizes that compounded from $5,000 to $44,000 over a period, the resulting trade sizes would be unrealistic and unmanageable in actual trading. Amibroker's calculations do not account for these practical limitations.
In summary
While backtesting can be a useful tool, traders must approach it with a critical eye and an understanding of its limitations. Relying solely on backtested results without considering real-world factors can lead to a false sense of confidence and poor trading outcomes.
Skate.
And do not forget taxes..where do you get the money to pay a 30 to 48% tax..even a working system with phenomenal return will have a yearly tax induced DD at a specific timeAmibroker Backtesting Can Provide a Misleading Perspective
@bettamania, even the best trading software can give you a false sense of security, leading you to persist with a strategy when there may not actually be an edge or the edge has not been properly established. Backtesting is not the be-all and end-all, as it is not the only important factor in strategy development or evaluation. However, it can provide valuable insights into how a strategy might perform when traded live.
Backtesting Relies on Historical Data
To achieve meaningful results, it is crucial to approach backtesting thoughtfully. There are several important dos and don'ts to consider when interpreting the results.
One common pitfall is fooling yourself by backtesting with compounding
While it may look impressive on paper and help sell a strategy, it does not reflect real-world trading conditions. For example, if you backtested a strategy with a starting balance of $100,000 and position sizes that compounded from $5,000 to $44,000 over a period, the resulting trade sizes would be unrealistic and unmanageable in actual trading. Amibroker's calculations do not account for these practical limitations.
In summary
While backtesting can be a useful tool, traders must approach it with a critical eye and an understanding of its limitations. Relying solely on backtested results without considering real-world factors can lead to a false sense of confidence and poor trading outcomes.
Skate.
@Joe Blow
Just FYA, I got none of the postings into my mail even I am following this thread.
Regards
View attachment 179888
Without having OPENING prices How does your Back testing work on todays GAPS on FMG and SFR?Skate your trail stop looks very nice. It is tightening on the top. Are you keen to share a bit of the trail stop info?
View attachment 179922
Skate your trail stop looks very nice. It is tightening on the top. Are you keen to share a bit of the trail stop info?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?