- Joined
- 28 December 2013
- Posts
- 6,392
- Reactions
- 24,319
Traders can obtain important insights and learn how to adapt such strategies to meet their own needs and goals by investigating and examining instances of successful trading techniques that have been previously used.
@ducati916 my interpretation of what you are saying here is that you would be entering a trade for fundamental reasons and therefore may be entering a bull position when price still falling. Please correct me if I'm mistaken. A lot of traders do this for a number of different reasons and for these traders, price becomes a confirming indicator. I think that @Skate would be entering on positive price movement due to the mechanical nature of his systems, Skate please correct me if I'm mistaken.Many swear that 'price' is the primary indicator, others (myself) laugh at that notion and maintain that price is only a momentary illusion and fade price.
I think that @Skate would be entering on positive price movement due to the mechanical nature of his systems, Skate please correct me if I'm mistaken.
The (VWMA) indicator makes it useful for identifying trends with higher trading activity and I sell that position when the trend loses momentum. Simple and repeatable.
@ducati916 my interpretation of what you are saying here is that you would be entering a trade for fundamental reasons and therefore may be entering a bull position when price still falling. Please correct me if I'm mistaken. A lot of traders do this for a number of different reasons and for these traders, price becomes a confirming indicator. I think that @Skate would be entering on positive price movement due to the mechanical nature of his systems, Skate please correct me if I'm mistaken.
My interpretation of the 70 20 10 rule given by Mr @ducati916 is that your knowledge/expertise..so to build a system or learning trading is 70% self taught experience, 20% shared knowledge like peer exchanges or ASF ? and 10% fundamental learning aka books etcMr Dave,
First off I wouldn't particularly expect anyone to grab the right end of the stick because I was purposely being a bit vague.
I do not use 'fundamentals' in trading, particularly not micro.
I trade volatility (vega) modified by (theta). As a consequence of that I implicitly trade time in addition. The greater the timeframe (duration) the greater the variability in volatility. I hedge out 'price'.
So the timeframe that I like is 8mths-1year. This usually allows for enough news flow...which drives volatility to make the trade profitable. It's definitely not everyone's cup-of-tea, but it means I only need check the market once a day and I'm not tied to the screen.
In addition to my full time job I trade for a prop. firm which provides access to huge capital (OPM) which of course leverages my base capital x100+. This is (obviously) a factor in a lethargic timeframe. The % return on capital is +/- 30%/annum. Which doesn't sound terribly exciting but leveraged up...nice dollars.
jog on
duc
We're trading and investing in an interesting time. Although I can say this at almost any time since I'm a market tragic.. Trend traders would replace interesting with frustrating since the ASX market has been stuck in a range for two years. Currently the XAO is in a narrow range (7800 - 7100) within a larger range (7900 - 6600).
Post number 8609.Ending a trade on the basis of emotions might be a rash decision that could result in substantial losses.
From my perspective, it is better to trade the range's brief fluctuations by jumping on breaks only under defined circumstances. Trading this way needs patience, self-control, and an acute sense of timing.
"Trading for Beginners - Skate's Practical Guide to Profitable Trading"
A daily series of posts aimed at those just starting out on their trading journey.
13. Our first losing trade
Never enter the markets without a clear and well-defined trading plan, doing so avoids letting our emotions take over. We may reduce the influence of emotions on our decision-making and improve our long-term trading success by establishing a precise exit plan and profit targets and adhering to them.
Skate.
Post number 8609. Skate said:
Ending a trade on the basis of emotions might be a rash decision that could result in substantial losses.
Exactitude, clarity, in a trading plan will not save you if you are too big in the trade.
Position size is the #1 rule, AKA capital allocation management.
To achieve long-term profitability, other elements including risk management, position sizing, and filters are also crucial.
"Trading for Beginners - Skate's Practical Guide to Profitable Trading"
A daily series of posts aimed at those just starting out on their trading journey.
12. Emotions drive us
Our emotions are a typical source of irritation when it comes to trading. Strong emotions such as fear, greed, or enthusiasm may cause us to lose our emotional intelligence and make decisions that are not in our best interests. This is why trading can be so challenging since it involves a lot of emotional control and self-control.
Our decision-making is largely influenced by our emotions, and trading is no different. But it's crucial to realise that we don't have to let our emotions rule us. Although emotions can motivate us, this does not mean that we should allow them to rule our trading actions.
We may lessen the impact of emotional biases in trading by sticking to our trading plan and avoiding rash decisions. This calls for self-control and dedication to our trading plan. It is crucial to have a well-defined trading strategy, a clear grasp of one's own risk tolerance, and trading abilities if you want to successfully combat "emotional bias" whilst trading.
This involves identifying our emotional triggers and figuring out how to effectively control them. You may reduce the influence of emotions on your decision-making and improve your chances of long-term success by establishing a precise trading plan and adhering to it.
Successful trading requires a combination of knowledge, skill, discipline, and emotional intelligence for successful trading. By being aware of biases and actively attempting to overcome them, traders can enhance and improve their decision-making process and raise their chances of long-term success by actively managing their emotions and attempting to overcome them.
Skate.
So with an 'edge' of 50% how often would you encounter 5 straight losses? Now when you encounter that 5 straight loss run also makes a huge difference. If they are your first 5 trades, then pretty much anything over 2% and you are gone. Then I hear, stop losses. This is where the psychology (if you are too big) blows you up. You cannot adhere to the stop and take the loss (it'll come back, hold for the long term, blah, blah).
@ducati916, I must say your post got my attention realising the graphs were generic. When it comes to trading methods and risk management, there is a lot to unpack. Reducing drawdowns and managing successive losses is a critical area of importance to me. To limit drawdowns I always code a precise set of exits condition in the event that the market swings against any position. Having multiple exits assist in protecting capital and limiting losses.
Combining "time and lack of momentum" stops means that you exit the trade if the market doesn't move in your favour within a specific time frame or if momentum isn't moving in the desired direction. By doing this, you can reduce losses by not hanging on to trades that are not performing as expected.
In general, it's critical to have flexibility and an open mind when it comes to improving risk management methods and trading tactics.
View attachment 157173
Although you gave a sample of 50 trades, I may expand my point by using a lower sample size, like 22 trades over a 6-month period. We may disagree on the best way to make money, but I firmly believe that sharp selling is an essential element of successful trading.
I will let the highlighted boxes provide extra context and background on my point rather than going into great detail. Even while the number of successive winners and losers may be equal, their "value can vary greatly" depending on the particular elements and justifications I mentioned previously.
View attachment 157176
Skate.
The ETf landscape has greatly changed in the last year or so on the ASX.Agree. Your 'edge' is 55% with a R/R of what is approximately 1:2.7.
Those numbers will work.
Those numbers work in part due to your 'stop' strategy. If for whatever reason, failure in discipline or a market event that pushes the correlation to 1.0, then those numbers will change.
All the above is trade management.
Your 'risk' management taken as a portfolio, is for me far too risky. You are 100% long in a single strategy. Stocks: long. In an outright bull market, this is of course the correct overall position.
View attachment 157181
Currently and for some time now the ASX has been sideways.
Long only strategies should be scaled back in this scenario (possibly you have already done this). Portfolio management, or risk management or capital allocation, should now be sitting at strategies designed for a sideways market with small(er) allocations to bull and bear strategies. Only the strongest/weakest stocks in the strongest/weakest sectors should be taken as directional trades.
I know at one point your preference was for a weekly strategy. I'm guessing that your 'stale stop' has become far shorter in time than it may have been previously. A hard stop is a hard stop, so no particular adaption needed there.
This is 1 of my portfolio holdings:
View attachment 157182
Pretty much sideways with some volatility day-to-day. It is a sideways strategy. The point however is: if I was running a hard stop I would have been bumped out of this trade (potentially) several times. Therefore for me and this strategy a stop is a position size that allows a 100% loss. Ie. small relative to portfolio capital. I do however retain the ability to stop out or adjust the trade as I go. If I adjust, it becomes a NEW trade.
A caveat on adjustments: adjust your winners never your losers. If I do adjust, no longer can I run a 100% loss position. Now I must run a hard stop as the trade is a different trade than originally placed.
I would be very interested to see you develop a system or even adapt one of your stock systems to FX. This would provide you an opportunity to have a de facto 'SHORT' system. Traders in Aus. suffer great difficulties in having or executing a short system. FX would give you that ability. Surely there are any number of currency ETFs that could be traded?
Anyway, just food for thought.
jog on
duc
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?