@tech/a ML software is still in the development stage AFAIK
Qualification
Employers love degrees & qualifications - my office wall was once covered in them (they now reside in a plastic bag) @Warr87 has already given you good advice on Uni so I'll leave it at that.
Being a full time trader
With bucket-loads of money behind you, full time trading is an option otherwise stick to your day job. As they say with trading "how do you end up with a Million Dollars at the end of the year?" = Start with two (million) @qldfrog has also given you good advice.
Skate.
Yes Skate, happens often. But I went back to look at what happens if I just held onto the losers hoping they might take off again. Well the result is comforting, I am glad to have let go of losers when I did. Other than the occasional turn-around winner which I rarely catch as I am already onto researching other stocks or new themes in the market, the bulk of the losers sold tend to drift further down over time.(a) Have you ever executed a sell only to see the position reverse & take off again.
They do. My issue is usually being over qualified for most jobs, but that hasn't stopped me from going back and studying again. I love it and don't learn for the financial benefit, but it always helps. Uni is more about qualifications and it's meant to teach (outside of the domain specific knowledge) persistence, time management, reasoning skills, and logic. It's a point lost on most and many see it as merely a means for a high paying job. I think there is more to it than that, but I will jump down from that soapbox.
I also had a question about your CAM strategy. You obviously don't position score based on price. Is it ROC * some other indicator? What are some of the positionscoring ideas you like to rotate through when testing your systems?
I also had a question in regards to your CAM strategy (and perhaps its a good question for @qldfrog as well). Do you have a preference to buy the PB or the CT, or it doesn't matter for you?
Disclaimer
I use a proprietary 'Positionscore code' given to me by 'captain black' & if I was to disclose the ranking method or his code he would have my "guts for garters"
Yes Skate, happens often. But I went back to look at what happens if I just held onto the losers hoping they might take off again. Well the result is comforting, I am glad to have let go of losers when I did. Other than the occasional turn-around winner which I rarely catch as I am already onto researching other stocks or new themes in the market, the bulk of the losers sold tend to drift further down over time.
So emotionally it can be challenging to see a loser turn into a winner and go for a big run without me, but statistically it's re-assuring to stick to what I am doing by letting go of losers once it's dropped far enough.
Yes Skate, happens often. But I went back to look at what happens if I just held onto the losers hoping they might take off again. Well the result is comforting, I am glad to have let go of losers when I did. Other than the occasional turn-around winner which I rarely catch as I am already onto researching other stocks or new themes in the market, the bulk of the losers sold tend to drift further down over time.
So emotionally it can be challenging to see a loser turn into a winner and go for a big run without me, but statistically it's re-assuring to stick to what I am doing by letting go of losers once it's dropped far enough.
When the misery of a big loss is suddenly removed by selling the position you'll feel a surge of energy - the weight will be lifted & you might be surprised at how readily you can find other opportunities that will help you make up your loss.
I know you have looked at my code, changed my positionscore, and the whole system turned around and became a lot more profitable. While exits are key, improving the entries with positionscore certainly helps to improve an edge by building consistency.
I did a lot of tweak on the code, while it does keep a lot of a CAM strategy it does not use the CT anymore ..yeap..I also had a question in regards to your CAM strategy (and perhaps its a good question for @qldfrog as well). Do you have a preference to buy the PB or the CT, or it doesn't matter for you?
Thoroughly agree.
Any further news on @tech/a sons software?
Finding myself at mental crossroads...do I continue the pathway to registration (surveyor) or do I use transferrable skills and head the trading path, whilst still surveying out of enjoyment? Continue Uni for a piece of paper or to advance the mathematical analysis? Aargh!
What have I done...!
F.Rock
@Warr87 thank you for publicly acknowledging the small amount of helped I'd given you that was beneficial to your strategy. I appreciate your post.
Skate.
Are we talking global warming here?Lets talk about decision making (Faulty Thinking)
Many years ago I read an article why Doctors make mistakes. I'll write a post about Doctors & faulty thinking later today.
Think about this
If highly trained medical practitioners can get it wrong what chance is there of traders getting it constantly right. We "CAN" & we "DO" make better decisions because of a few reasons, "time" & "technology"
Doctors
They make their diagnosis "quickly" because of their lack of time using hunches from incomplete information, what hope have they really got.
A serious design flaw - faulty thinking
People are naturally pleased when processing information that supports their beliefs. Confirmation bias, the tendency to embrace information that supports their beliefs & reject information that contradicts them. Of the many forms of faulty thinking confirmation bias is right up there & it’s hard to conceive of a more serious design flaw than this.
Another serious design flaw - Conviction
A person with a conviction is a hard person to change. Tell him you disagree and he turns away. Show him facts or figures and he questions your sources. Appeal to logic and he fails to see your point. People tend not to listen to alternative views.
Skate.
Are we talking global warming here?My view is you should not have any conviction unless proven by experience..not foolproof but..do not take anything for granted
Be it trading or else
@Skate you commonly refer to people as stupid or idiots or lacking intelligence. (generalisations)
It pays to listen
When you talk, you are only repeating what you already know. But if you listen, you may learn something new.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?