This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Donald Trump - Business and tax stories

Jump to new
I did believe both before and after the election, that ballot harvesting was used. Along with money being distributed by these political organisations that were prevalent at the time. Also the assault on voting laws that preceded the election. Reps were caught napping.

It was the reasons why I believed Biden would win at the time.

I'm sure there was a lot of pushing past that grey area of legality. It stunk to high heavens.
 
Some more evidence from Maricopa County

(Cliff notes - predetermined outcome, which is now obvious)

​



Below

Trump was up to around 61% - 62 % of mailed in ballots up to election day.

After polls closed, you can see below how ballots were injected into the count and changed the outcome




​


Below - A sample from one of the pallets of ballots

Pallet 10 - 129 batches modified = 45.46% of ballots in that batch were modified

There are 3 ratings on how badly the ballots were modified - ES9 (highest), ES8 and ES7

​


Below is Pallet 10 Report

Pallet # 10
TV - Total Votes - 55,861
BC - Ballot count #285
B# - Boxes Count 40 Boxes on Pallet
EV - Early Voting - 100%
ED - Election Day - 0%
LEV - Late Early Vote 0%
PV - Provisional Vote 0%
FED - Federal Ballots 0%
DP - Duplicate Ballots 3.5%
∑+2 - Sum total

Dems - 31,610 votes
Reps - 23,084 votes
Independants - 636 votes
Independent Votes - 532

Batches on right hand side - gives you an indication on batch sizes

Batch dates - self explanatory

All of the ballots were ran through 2 machines only - H2 & H1

In the big batch box - the RED Coloured numbers represent manipulated batches




.
 
Durham v Sussman trial is very interesting.

The whole Russia Russia Russia (Alfa Bank) collusion was made up

Like l said, you've been played the whole time with the MSN colluding too.





 
I don't mean to ebb your flow @DB008 but two quick questions if I may:

1) didn't one of Trump's own Lawyers state that no reasonable person was expected to believe their allegations of the stolen Election?, and

2) Moon landing real or fake?

Thank you.

3) are you a comedian?
 
Hey Mo

Have you been paying attention to the Durham trial?

If so, what are your thoughts on it?


.
 
Don't forget folks....

This Was The Most Secure Election in US History
? ? ?

LOL

How dare you question the results. Shut up and follow the sheep....


​


.
 
Nothing to see here folks....

The Most Secure Election in US History
? ? ?

LOL

Are you paying attention Mo?


CISA (Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency) issues detailed advisory on vulnerabilities affecting certain versions of Dominion Voting Systems’ software​


This advisory identifies vulnerabilities affecting versions of the Dominion Voting Systems Democracy Suite ImageCast X, which is an in-person voting system used to allow voters to mark their ballot. The ImageCast X can be configured to allow a voter to produce a paper record or to record votes electronically. While these vulnerabilities present risks that should be mitigated as soon as possible, CISA has no evidence that these vulnerabilities have been exploited in any elections.

Exploitation of these vulnerabilities would require physical access to individual ImageCast X devices, access to the Election Management System (EMS), or the ability to modify files before they are uploaded to ImageCast X devices. Jurisdictions can prevent and/or detect the exploitation of these vulnerabilities by diligently applying the mitigations recommended in this advisory, including technical, physical, and operational controls that limit unauthorized access or manipulation of voting systems. Many of these mitigations are already typically standard practice in jurisdictions where these devices are in use and can be enhanced to further guard against exploitation of these vulnerabilities.


 
The Most Secure Election in US History
? ? ?

LOL


Dekalb County, GA - Hand Recount vs Machine Count​

Here is a very important concept illustrated by the Dekalb County hand recount numbers.

We want to bring this to your attention because this concept is equally applicable to CVR data, and pertains to the law of large numbers and the percentage votes between different voting methods for a given candidate.

In the case of Dekalb, there are 3 different voting methods:
  • Election Day
  • Advance Voting
  • Absentee Voting
Within a typical county we can expect the percentage votes for each candidate, for each voting method to be about the same (give or take 5%).

This principle holds true for the hand recount numbers for Dekalb County. However, it does not hold for the machine count. See the images below.

Vastly different percentage votes between voting methods for the same candidate goes against well established statistical principles.

The machine count clearly shows manipulation, and any CVR data that shows large differences in percentage votes between voting methods for the same candidate would also indicate the data was manipulated.






.
 
This is Tom Gallagher, an attorney, destroying election data


Your browser is not able to display this video.

.
 

And this is the view of the "alternative facts " brigade

As America watched Capitol attack testimony, Fox News gave an alternate reality

Tucker Carlson leads January 6 counter-programming, petulantly refusing to show the hearing: ‘We’re not playing along’
www.theguardian.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Why Donald Trump's Companies Went Bankrupt
Replies
3
Views
2K
noirua
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...