- Joined
- 9 July 2006
- Posts
- 5,922
- Reactions
- 1,591
Last edited:
Donald Trump - Business and tax stories
- Thread starter basilio
- Start date
-
- Tags
- business donald trump tax
- Joined
- 9 July 2006
- Posts
- 5,922
- Reactions
- 1,591
.
- Joined
- 9 July 2006
- Posts
- 5,922
- Reactions
- 1,591
.
I did believe both before and after the election, that ballot harvesting was used. Along with money being distributed by these political organisations that were prevalent at the time. Also the assault on voting laws that preceded the election. Reps were caught napping.
It was the reasons why I believed Biden would win at the time.
I'm sure there was a lot of pushing past that grey area of legality. It stunk to high heavens.
It was the reasons why I believed Biden would win at the time.
I'm sure there was a lot of pushing past that grey area of legality. It stunk to high heavens.
- Joined
- 9 July 2006
- Posts
- 5,922
- Reactions
- 1,591
Some more evidence from Maricopa County
(Cliff notes - predetermined outcome, which is now obvious)
Below
Trump was up to around 61% - 62 % of mailed in ballots up to election day.
After polls closed, you can see below how ballots were injected into the count and changed the outcome
Below - A sample from one of the pallets of ballots
Pallet 10 - 129 batches modified = 45.46% of ballots in that batch were modified
There are 3 ratings on how badly the ballots were modified - ES9 (highest), ES8 and ES7
Below is Pallet 10 Report
Pallet # 10
TV - Total Votes - 55,861
BC - Ballot count #285
B# - Boxes Count 40 Boxes on Pallet
EV - Early Voting - 100%
ED - Election Day - 0%
LEV - Late Early Vote 0%
PV - Provisional Vote 0%
FED - Federal Ballots 0%
DP - Duplicate Ballots 3.5%
∑+2 - Sum total
Dems - 31,610 votes
Reps - 23,084 votes
Independants - 636 votes
Independent Votes - 532
Batches on right hand side - gives you an indication on batch sizes
Batch dates - self explanatory
All of the ballots were ran through 2 machines only - H2 & H1
In the big batch box - the RED Coloured numbers represent manipulated batches
.
(Cliff notes - predetermined outcome, which is now obvious)
Below
Trump was up to around 61% - 62 % of mailed in ballots up to election day.
After polls closed, you can see below how ballots were injected into the count and changed the outcome
Below - A sample from one of the pallets of ballots
Pallet 10 - 129 batches modified = 45.46% of ballots in that batch were modified
There are 3 ratings on how badly the ballots were modified - ES9 (highest), ES8 and ES7
Below is Pallet 10 Report
Pallet # 10
TV - Total Votes - 55,861
BC - Ballot count #285
B# - Boxes Count 40 Boxes on Pallet
EV - Early Voting - 100%
ED - Election Day - 0%
LEV - Late Early Vote 0%
PV - Provisional Vote 0%
FED - Federal Ballots 0%
DP - Duplicate Ballots 3.5%
∑+2 - Sum total
Dems - 31,610 votes
Reps - 23,084 votes
Independants - 636 votes
Independent Votes - 532
Batches on right hand side - gives you an indication on batch sizes
Batch dates - self explanatory
All of the ballots were ran through 2 machines only - H2 & H1
In the big batch box - the RED Coloured numbers represent manipulated batches
.
- Joined
- 9 July 2006
- Posts
- 5,922
- Reactions
- 1,591
Durham v Sussman trial is very interesting.
The whole Russia Russia Russia (Alfa Bank) collusion was made up
Like l said, you've been played the whole time with the MSN colluding too.
The whole Russia Russia Russia (Alfa Bank) collusion was made up
Like l said, you've been played the whole time with the MSN colluding too.
Mohammed Hazabig'un
Fundamentalist
- Joined
- 15 May 2022
- Posts
- 157
- Reactions
- 359
I don't mean to ebb your flow @DB008 but two quick questions if I may:
1) didn't one of Trump's own Lawyers state that no reasonable person was expected to believe their allegations of the stolen Election?, and
2) Moon landing real or fake?
Thank you.
3) are you a comedian?
1) didn't one of Trump's own Lawyers state that no reasonable person was expected to believe their allegations of the stolen Election?, and
2) Moon landing real or fake?
Thank you.
3) are you a comedian?
- Joined
- 9 July 2006
- Posts
- 5,922
- Reactions
- 1,591
Hey Mo
Have you been paying attention to the Durham trial?
If so, what are your thoughts on it?
.
Have you been paying attention to the Durham trial?
If so, what are your thoughts on it?
.
- Joined
- 9 July 2006
- Posts
- 5,922
- Reactions
- 1,591
Don't forget folks....
This Was The Most Secure Election in US History
? ? ?
LOL
How dare you question the results. Shut up and follow the sheep....
.
This Was The Most Secure Election in US History
? ? ?LOL
How dare you question the results. Shut up and follow the sheep....
.
- Joined
- 9 July 2006
- Posts
- 5,922
- Reactions
- 1,591
Nothing to see here folks....
The Most Secure Election in US History
? ? ?
LOL
Are you paying attention Mo?
This advisory identifies vulnerabilities affecting versions of the Dominion Voting Systems Democracy Suite ImageCast X, which is an in-person voting system used to allow voters to mark their ballot. The ImageCast X can be configured to allow a voter to produce a paper record or to record votes electronically. While these vulnerabilities present risks that should be mitigated as soon as possible, CISA has no evidence that these vulnerabilities have been exploited in any elections.
Exploitation of these vulnerabilities would require physical access to individual ImageCast X devices, access to the Election Management System (EMS), or the ability to modify files before they are uploaded to ImageCast X devices. Jurisdictions can prevent and/or detect the exploitation of these vulnerabilities by diligently applying the mitigations recommended in this advisory, including technical, physical, and operational controls that limit unauthorized access or manipulation of voting systems. Many of these mitigations are already typically standard practice in jurisdictions where these devices are in use and can be enhanced to further guard against exploitation of these vulnerabilities.
The Most Secure Election in US History
? ? ?LOL
Are you paying attention Mo?
CISA (Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency) issues detailed advisory on vulnerabilities affecting certain versions of Dominion Voting Systems’ software
This advisory identifies vulnerabilities affecting versions of the Dominion Voting Systems Democracy Suite ImageCast X, which is an in-person voting system used to allow voters to mark their ballot. The ImageCast X can be configured to allow a voter to produce a paper record or to record votes electronically. While these vulnerabilities present risks that should be mitigated as soon as possible, CISA has no evidence that these vulnerabilities have been exploited in any elections.
Exploitation of these vulnerabilities would require physical access to individual ImageCast X devices, access to the Election Management System (EMS), or the ability to modify files before they are uploaded to ImageCast X devices. Jurisdictions can prevent and/or detect the exploitation of these vulnerabilities by diligently applying the mitigations recommended in this advisory, including technical, physical, and operational controls that limit unauthorized access or manipulation of voting systems. Many of these mitigations are already typically standard practice in jurisdictions where these devices are in use and can be enhanced to further guard against exploitation of these vulnerabilities.
- Joined
- 9 July 2006
- Posts
- 5,922
- Reactions
- 1,591
The Most Secure Election in US History
? ? ?
LOL
Here is a very important concept illustrated by the Dekalb County hand recount numbers.
We want to bring this to your attention because this concept is equally applicable to CVR data, and pertains to the law of large numbers and the percentage votes between different voting methods for a given candidate.
In the case of Dekalb, there are 3 different voting methods:
This principle holds true for the hand recount numbers for Dekalb County. However, it does not hold for the machine count. See the images below.
Vastly different percentage votes between voting methods for the same candidate goes against well established statistical principles.
The machine count clearly shows manipulation, and any CVR data that shows large differences in percentage votes between voting methods for the same candidate would also indicate the data was manipulated.
.
? ? ?LOL
Dekalb County, GA - Hand Recount vs Machine Count
Here is a very important concept illustrated by the Dekalb County hand recount numbers.
We want to bring this to your attention because this concept is equally applicable to CVR data, and pertains to the law of large numbers and the percentage votes between different voting methods for a given candidate.
In the case of Dekalb, there are 3 different voting methods:
- Election Day
- Advance Voting
- Absentee Voting
This principle holds true for the hand recount numbers for Dekalb County. However, it does not hold for the machine count. See the images below.
Vastly different percentage votes between voting methods for the same candidate goes against well established statistical principles.
The machine count clearly shows manipulation, and any CVR data that shows large differences in percentage votes between voting methods for the same candidate would also indicate the data was manipulated.
.
- Joined
- 9 July 2006
- Posts
- 5,922
- Reactions
- 1,591
This is Tom Gallagher, an attorney, destroying election data
.
.
Knobby22
Mmmmmm 2nd breakfast
- Joined
- 13 October 2004
- Posts
- 9,609
- Reactions
- 6,401
Lets see if Liz Cheney can get Trump chucked in jail.
www.abc.net.au
Ivanka's admission, a stunned Trump and shocking video: What we learned from the Capitol riot hearing
Armed with new videos, text messages and emails, the committee investigating the riots at the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, has laid out its evidence for the American public. Here's what we learned.
www.abc.net.au
- Joined
- 30 June 2008
- Posts
- 15,357
- Reactions
- 7,232
Lets see if Liz Cheney can get Trump chucked in jail.
Ivanka's admission, a stunned Trump and shocking video: What we learned from the Capitol riot hearing
Armed with new videos, text messages and emails, the committee investigating the riots at the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, has laid out its evidence for the American public. Here's what we learned.
And this is the view of the "alternative facts " brigade
As America watched Capitol attack testimony, Fox News gave an alternate reality
Tucker Carlson leads January 6 counter-programming, petulantly refusing to show the hearing: ‘We’re not playing along’
Knobby22
Mmmmmm 2nd breakfast
- Joined
- 13 October 2004
- Posts
- 9,609
- Reactions
- 6,401
Gotta control the sheep.And this is the view of the "alternative facts " brigade
As America watched Capitol attack testimony, Fox News gave an alternate reality
Tucker Carlson leads January 6 counter-programming, petulantly refusing to show the hearing: ‘We’re not playing along’www.theguardian.com
- Joined
- 30 June 2008
- Posts
- 15,357
- Reactions
- 7,232
Clearly Trumps daughter Ivanka and his ex AG William Barr are not part of the "alternative facts" brigade.
www.theguardian.com
Ivanka Trump says she does not believe father’s claim 2020 election was stolen
Ex-president’s daughter tells House January 6 panel she accepted William Barr’s view that voter fraud claims had ‘zero basis’
- Joined
- 9 July 2006
- Posts
- 5,922
- Reactions
- 1,591
Hmm, now that is interesting...
I wonder why...???
New Mexico
I wonder why...???
New Mexico
- Joined
- 9 July 2006
- Posts
- 5,922
- Reactions
- 1,591
For...???
- Joined
- 29 January 2006
- Posts
- 7,217
- Reactions
- 4,437
This is the gift that keeps giving.
No evidence other than what they keep making up, and idiots swallow it all up, hook line and sinker.
- Joined
- 9 July 2006
- Posts
- 5,922
- Reactions
- 1,591
