Donald Trump - Business and tax stories

[moXJO]

Numbers Don't Lie: Trump Answers a Lot More Questions From Reporters Than Biden

townhall.com

Trump answered a total of 1,141 questions from a Washington press corps that he maintains is openly hostile to his administration, while Biden responded to just 274 questions from local networks and liberal cable news channels like CNN and MSNBC.

During the week of Aug. 9, the president took 196 questions from journalists while Biden answered just three.


But why would you with obvious bias

 

[DB008]

Spies who lie: The New York Post contacted the senior ex-intelligence officials who signed the shameful 2020 letter declaring Hunter Biden’s laptop and its emails the NYP ran were "Russian disinformation."

"Not one apologized. Most refused to comment. A few like James Clapper doubled down," says editor Miranda Devine.

https://nypost.com/2022/03/18/intel...to-apologize-for-smearing-hunter-biden-story/​

Remember their names: These are the 50+ former "intelligence" officials who colluded to interfere in the 2020 election by signing a letter saying that Hunter's laptop was a Russian plot:

James Clapper
Michael Hayden
Leon Panetta
John Brennan
Marc Polymeropoulos
John Sipher
John McLaughlin
Michael Morell
Doug Wise
Nick Rasmussen
Russ Travers
Andy Liepman
John Moseman
Larry Pfeiffer
Jeremy Bash
Rodney Snyder
Glenn Gerstell
David Buckley
Nada Bakos
Patty Brandmaier
James Bruce
David Cariens
Janice Cariens
Paul Kolbe
Peter Corsell
Brett Davis
Thomas Finger
Roger Zane George
Steven Hall
Kent Harrington
Don Hepburn
Timothy Kilbourn
Rick Ledgett
Ron Marks
Jonna Hiestand Mendez
Emile Nakhleh
Gerald O’Shea
David Priess
Pam Purcilly
Chris Savos
Nick Shapiro
Stephen Slick
Cynthia Strand
Greg Tarbell
David Terry
Greg Treverton
John Tullius
David Vanell
Mike Vickers
Winston Wiley
Kristin Wood

Nine further "intelligence" officials colluded with those listed above but decided to remain anonymous.



Remember James 'not wittingly' Clapper - who lied to congress about spying on citizens...???

​

Operation Mockingbird​

Operation Mockingbird is an alleged large-scale program of the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) that began in the early years of the Cold War and attempted to manipulate news media for propaganda purposes​

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird

(Hunter Biden)
​

And you still believe what is published on TV

? ? ? ? ? ?

 

[DB008]

I'm waiting for the report by J. Alex Halderman to be released.

Halderman was given twelve weeks of access to an unused Dominion ICX voting machine — the same machines used in Georgia and 16 other states. His conclusions completely destroy the false narrative about the 2020 election being “the most secure election in history.”

Halderman produced a 25,000-word report that’s so explosive neither the federal judge in charge of the case nor the U.S. federal government wants it released to the public.

 

[DB008]

Most Secure Election in US History
? ? ?

LOL

Nothing to see here folks, move along sheep.....

Video Captures Pennsylvania Ballot Trafficker Forced to Break-Up Fat Pile of Harvested Ballots Into Smaller Stacks to Stuff Them Into Drop Box ​

A video obtained by the Montgomery County Republican Committee through a right-to-know request shows a single person placing what appears to be at least a dozen ballots into a ballot drop box at the Upper Dublin Library on 11/2/2020.

Pennsylvania voters are only allowed to place their own ballot in drop boxes.

Earlier in the week during a Montgomery County Commissioners meeting, Liz Havey, Chair of the Montgomery County Republican Committee, said the full video obtained of the Upper Dublin dropbox shows over 100 people dropping off more than one ballot in just a few hours. Havey also claims that the county would not place security at the drop boxes and did not review the video.

.​

 

[basilio]

Now this sounds like a really good idea..

Kicks the Russian oligarchs right in the bollarchs

 

[DB008]

Most Secure Election in US History
? ? ?

LOL


Mesa Forensic Report #3 released.

​

 

[DB008]

Most Secure Election in US History
? ? ?

LOL

​

Key findings in the Mesa County Report #3​

Key Finding # 1​

1. Creation of multiple databases: The Mesa County voting system server should have had three databases in its election project for each election. But in Mesa County’s system, two additional databases were found for two separate elections. The existence of those additional databases, and the movement of ballot records between them, breaking the chain of evidence needed for ballot and vote authentication is proof of voting system non-compliance with Federal Voting System Standards mandatory under Colorado law, and proof of manipulation. This is akin to having two sets of accounting records in a business, to hide fraudulent and illegal financial transactions.

Key Finding # 2​

There was a shadow database created and the votes that the shadow database counted were not identical to votes in the authorized database.

2. A pattern of multiple illegal databases in separate elections: Multiple databases were found in both the 2020 election records, and in the 2021 election records. Slight variations in the method of ballot and batch record copying between databases reinforces the conclusion that the manipulation was deliberate.

Key Finding # 3​

The shadow database compiled partial voting records in such a way as to make post-election authentication impossible.

3. Ballot and election records chain of evidence broken in multiple ways: Once ballot images and records were moved, deleted, manipulated, and re-copied, the chain of evidence was broken. Digital files required to verify ballot image authenticity simply did not exist in the new databases. It makes it impossible to verify the authenticity of so many ballot records. Now election results cannot be determined from the voting system records.

And here’s the relevant summary of discrepancies between the original and authorized database and the illegal shadow database.

Key Finding #4​

The shadow database was created and manipulated inside the Mesa County election system so that Mesa County officials were unaware of any illegal activity.

4. No accident: There are no listed, authorized features and procedures, or even the ability through a combination of features and procedures on the electronic voting systems to instruct or enable election officials to manipulate ballot records and vote count databases in the manner discovered. This activity was unauthorized, and could have been conducted in any number of ways, including combinations of unauthorized software, remote access and/or malware introduced through a removable device (USB drive).

In fact, Mesa County election officials were alert enough during the 2020 election to notice that they were reviewing the same ballots twice in some cases. They believed that a computer glitch was to blame and called the vendor.

​

Key Finding # 5​

5. Illegal certification of Colorado electronic voting systems: Because the electronic voting system in Mesa County, Colorado was not only vulnerable and exposed to manipulation, including the systematic destruction of election records, and proof of actual manipulation, the voting system could not possibly have met the requirements of the Federal Voting System Standards mandated by Colorado statute.

Here’s a comparison of the “load order” of the two databases. In Figure 5, the load order is a perfect sequence —that’s the original order from the authorized database as batches of votes were recorded.

Now look at the load order of the illegal database.

In figure 6, the load order from the shadow database is now broken — it’s missing batches 50, 52, 53, 54, 56, 57, 59, 65, 72, 75, 80, 85, and 89 through 113. This is proof that somebody deliberately omitted those batches of votes in the shadow database. They didn’t want them included in the final vote tally.

All of those votes were simply not counted in the 2020 election

.

 

[Craton]

Most Secure Election in US History
? ? ?

LOL

​

Key findings in the Mesa County Report #3​

Key Finding # 1​

View attachment 139519​

Key Finding # 2​

There was a shadow database created and the votes that the shadow database counted were not identical to votes in the authorized database.

View attachment 139520​

Key Finding # 3​

The shadow database compiled partial voting records in such a way as to make post-election authentication impossible.


And here’s the relevant summary of discrepancies between the original and authorized database and the illegal shadow database.

View attachment 139521​

Key Finding #4​

The shadow database was created and manipulated inside the Mesa County election system so that Mesa County officials were unaware of any illegal activity.



In fact, Mesa County election officials were alert enough during the 2020 election to notice that they were reviewing the same ballots twice in some cases. They believed that a computer glitch was to blame and called the vendor.

View attachment 139522​

​

Key Finding # 5​

Here’s a comparison of the “load order” of the two databases. In Figure 5, the load order is a perfect sequence —that’s the original order from the authorized database as batches of votes were recorded.

View attachment 139523​

Now look at the load order of the illegal database.

View attachment 139524​

In figure 6, the load order from the shadow database is now broken — it’s missing batches 50, 52, 53, 54, 56, 57, 59, 65, 72, 75, 80, 85, and 89 through 113. This is proof that somebody deliberately omitted those batches of votes in the shadow database. They didn’t want them included in the final vote tally.

All of those votes were simply not counted in the 2020 election

.

So there's no way of knowing to which party/candidate the missing votes were for huh?

Although as Biden won all nine college/electoral votes, hardly seems to matter.

 

[DB008]

So there's no way of knowing to which party/candidate the missing votes were for huh?

Although as Biden won all nine college/electoral votes, hardly seems to matter.

You are completely missing the point.

 

[Craton]

Um, no, I don't think I am. If they can fudge the numbers, it ain't the most secure is it?

Now, if they can fudge the numbers, surely those culpable would (apart from facing the courts) not only know the correct numbers but be able to correct the result?
That's all I'm asking. My guess is that due to the, ah, mishandling of the data lends weight to Trump's claims but also my guess, he was the one to have paid for the corruption...

 

[DB008]

Glenn Greenwald, spot on as usual

The WaPo is also changing it's tune.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-china-laptop/
​

That's 2 news outlets in less than a fortnight that have now changed their tune about Hunter Biden's laptop and CCP business dealings.

I wonder why? Maybe its the rumoured Grand Jury that is probing into his foreign dealings, not declaring income (80k per month on Ukraine Burisma income) and other doggy business affairs and personal concerns (underage/pedo pictures).​

.​

 

[moXJO]

I have noticed nytimes and washpo all starting to post articles on the laptop.

 

[DB008]

I have noticed nytimes and washpo all starting to post articles on the laptop.

Because they know that Biden will be gone soon and Hunter Biden is getting indicted/under grand jury investigation. Having a crackhead son and forgetting about a laptop that had so much evidence on it was a blessing in disguise. Tell me what DOD Encryption Keys with 20 year validity is doing on a private citizens laptop (link)?



Most Secure Election in US History
? ? ?

LOL

.

 

[DB008]

.​

 

[DB008]

It's not that the Democrats cheated in the 2020 Election, it is now coming out how badly they cheated.

2020 was a total disgrace

 

[DB008]

.​

 

[DB008]

Most Secure Election in US History
? ? ?

LOL

Complete and utter joke...

Arizona AG Investigation Determines There Were ‘Instances of Election Fraud’ and Claims Individuals Will Be ‘Prosecuted for Various Election Crimes'​

Arizona AG issues initial report on election fraud based on Maricopa audit: “The EIU’s review has uncovered instances of election fraud by individuals who have been or will be prosecuted for various election crimes,” said the report on its first page.​

​

Full 12 page report here:​

https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2022-04/2022-04-06 Fann letter.pdf​

​

Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich released an “initial review” of Maricopa County’s 2020 election, summarizing the preliminary findings from his “ongoing” investigation in a letter to Senate President Karen Fann today.​

​

Brnovich writes that his team has “uncovered instances of election fraud by individuals who have been or will be prosecuted for various election crimes.” However, due to disclosure limitations related active “criminal and civil investigations”.​

​

The following are excerpts from the AG’s Interim Report:​

​

“Six months ago the Arizona Attorney General's Office (the "Office") received reports sent from the Arizona State Senate concerning its Maricopa County Forensic Election Audit. In addition, the Attorney General's Election Integrity Unit (EIU) has received and is reviewing additional complaints alleging election failures and potential misconduct that occurred in 2020.​

​

Our team of EIU investigators and attorneys has now collectively spent thousands of hours reviewing the Senate's audit reports and other complaints, conducting interviews, and analyzing Maricopa County's election system and processes. We have reached the conclusion that the 2020 election in Maricopa County revealed serious vulnerabilities that must be addressed and raises questions about the 2020 election in Arizona.​

​

The EIU's review has uncovered instances of election fraud by individuals who have been or will be prosecuted for various election crimes.

The EIU's review is ongoing and we are therefore limited in what we can disclose about specific criminal and civil investigations. Thus, this interim report will focus on what our office can presently share and the current status of our review.​

​

We can report that there are problematic system-wide issues that relate to early ballot handling and verification. The early ballot signature verification system in Maricopa County is insufficient to guard against abuse. At times election workers conducting the verification process had only seconds to review a signature. For example, on November 4, 2020, the Maricopa County Recorder verified 206,648 early ballot affidavit signatures, which resulted in an average of 4.6 seconds per signature. There are simply too many early ballots that must be verified in too limited a period of time, thus leaving the system vulnerable to error, fraud and oversight.​

​

Moreover, our review has determined that in multiple instances, Maricopa County failed to follow critical procedures when transporting early ballots from drop locations to the election headquarters. It is estimated that between 100,000 and 200,000 ballots were transported without a proper chain of custody.​

​

The first half of this report discusses document production issues we have confronted with Maricopa County and the EIU's ongoing review of the Senate's audit reports and other complaints. The rest of this report then sets forth our election integrity concerns and recommendations…”​

​

The report then goes on to identify publicly known issues -​

• In the areas of early-ballot signature verification
• Ballot drop boxes
• Use of private grant monies by election officials
• Election document preservation and transparency

​

.​

 

[DB008]

AZ AG Interim Report

.​

 

[DB008]

.​

 

[DB008]

Most Secure Election in US History
? ? ?

LOL

​