- Joined
- 14 February 2005
- Posts
- 15,343
- Reactions
- 17,660
Exactly. And if I had broken the law then they would have sided WITH the police and I would have been in big trouble.wabbit said:Can I also assume Smurf, that when you did get injured doing something you knew was stupid, your parents/guardians told you it was your own fault for being stupid? If you were injured through doing something that you didn't know was stupid, then your parents assumed the responsibility and aplogised to you for not properly supervising and guarding you?
Your parents didn't blame the council, or the school teachers or the Government?
Ahhh... them were the days.
On the topic of fences that has been raised by others, I will say this. New electricity sub-stations are now designed to be as safe as possible for intruders in recognition of the reality that break-ins occur despite high fences, barbed wire and dozens of "Near approach will cause INSTANT DEATH" warning signs. And most of those responsible are under high school age. You just can't keep someone out if they want to get in to retrieve their tennis ball etc.
If you trespass onto a certain large industrial site in Tasmania (I won't mention which one for obvious reasons) then the white van appears. White van? That's the permanent security they have to pick up those who shouldn't be there. Suffice to say that it is needed despite the whole site being surrounded by a high fence. Security that is clearly needed given that they have had actual malicious damage in the past. And yet 30 years ago anyone could drive straight through the site without question because there simply wasn't a concern about security. Back then it was simply accepted that you wouldn't wander around the site and start messing with things. And if you got hurt then it was YOUR fault for deciding to wander around a heavy industrial site. Now there's a need to actively patrol the plant and even courier drivers undergo a full site induction before being allowed to drop off a parcel. How times have changed!