Guys I really don't get the criticism of trading fulltime because you have to "stare at a screen all day"
As apposed to what??
Working the average job where you stare at a screen from 9 to 5. And have your income, hours, holidays, sick leave, over time, 'career' development, earning capacity, recognition, environment, colleagues, profit and life all controlled by someone else, mostly a tosser!
A bit off topic, but the actual figures here, and in most other Western countries is around 65% fail within the first 3 years. The 90% thrown around is not backed by any research
I love working for myself and wouldn't have it any other way. Work for me is more like hanging around at home. I'm not glued to the screen, I do something else with my time and take regular glances. I know what I like to trade, so when I see something promising that is when I'll focus on that market.
I'd be interested in a 10k->50k challenge. You wouldn't be able to offer odds that interest me though, as I feel that money would be better spent on trading than sitting in escrow. Nevermind, we'll likely have this discussion in 6-12 months.
Cant help remembering that you dont have $50k.
Seriously with the statements you have and are making youd think you actually knew.
Clearly you dont. Bit tough I know but really I dont think you qualify to make such statements.
I'd like to average at least 4 ticks per day, but that is just hope, not an expectation.
hardly my pointNot sure why just because anyone is in a 9 to 5 job they have someone else controlling there lives, you could say the same thing for you only your controlled by the HKFE
Yep agree its a boring isolating job for sure. One of the reasons why I always keep coming back to the idea of working prop.I think it's the stare at the screen all day by yourself which is the connotation.
That is such a **** stat. Its completely wrong. It comes from, I think, the stats of business names not being re register after the initial registration.90% of Businesses fail in the First 3 yrs.
That is such a **** stat. Its completely wrong. It comes from, I think, the stats of business names not being re register after the initial registration.
Which has absolutely no link to actual real business that start.
And of course doesn't take into account the many many business that change name, especially after they are successfully on sold to the next owners who then change the biz name. So there is a very successful business, an exit strategy implemented, being thrown around as a failure.
hardly my point
If I don't want to work tomorrow I don't have to or next week. Try ringing up your boss and tell him that your not coming in next week cause you don't feel like working.
Or tell your boss that you did some really good work last week and have decided to reward yourself by taking a holiday although you have no holiday leave left
Or telling her that you will not work on that project they need anymore because your colleges are wankers.
Or telling him that you did some really good work last week and you should get 10 x your wage. Working for yourself, which trading is, is the ultimate leverage. Effort and smarts is rewarded exponentially not so as a wage slave. Working for someone else is always 1 to 1 leverage.
Tell me more,I'm interested in how you interpret that!Working for someone else is always 1 to 1 leverage
Tech you said that 90% fail based on what? A stat that you don't know where it comes from. I have told you where I think it comes from, business name registration - you can hardly count them as business.If you consider business success making a below Average wage or No wage then it is complete ****
Is your stat so black and white between success and failure?
Capital required = Current income X 4
_________________________
(% Return /100)
If you earn $50,000 and think you can make 40% per year I reckon you would need at least $500,000 capital to replace your wage.
Maths not a strong point T/H?
So will re phrase. As it seems to get people excited.
A large majority of business fail my measure of success.
My idea of a successful business is one which allow you (The owner) the freedom of the restraints of both time and money.
You may have noticed that's the way I look at everything in life.
No grey.
My idea of a successful business is one which allow you (The owner) the freedom of the restraints of both time and money.
Not having staff, suppliers nor customers problems leaves you with just 1 worry - profit
I tend to agree, talks the talk but is yet to actually walk the walk.
Mr J, do you still live at home with your parents? Because I find it hard to believe anyone could live of an average of 4 ticks a day without living with their parents or having someone else to pay most of the bills. Especially since I recall you saying your living expenses are minimal and you could compound most of your winnings.
I now understand your lack of understanding when very experienced traders have mentioned the difficultly of compounding and growing capital after living expenses and tax are removed from the profit.
I find it hard to believe that a trader wouldn't compound. Increasing position size after gaining capital is compounding, and I would think all traders do this.
'Compounding' is based the accumulation of interest paid back to the
principle over the long term. The greater the interest and the longer
the timeframe, the larger the interest is paid back to the principle.
Maybe you don't give a toss about a long term plan....
"Talk the talk and walk the walk" is a pretty foolish line. It suggests that an opinion is only worthwhile if it has results behind it, and this is quite shallow. An opinion should be judged on its own merit. If it is clever or insightful, I don't care who said it. I'm not suggesting that everything I say is clever or insightful, but it's not garbage either. Feel free to point out any errors in my posts. If most of it is fine, what's the problem?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?