Yeah I do. Do you?You got google and the internet right? Australia have yet to implement net non-neutrality.
Did you show a full or partial set of those marriage therapy records to the Washington Post?" asked Mitchell.
"I don't remember," said Ford. "I remember summarizing for her [the Post reporter] what they said. So I'm not — I'm not quite sure if I actually gave her the record."
"OK, so it's possible that the reporter did not see these notes?" said Mitchell.
"I don't know if she's — I can't recall whether she saw them directly or if I just told her what they said," Ford answered. (As quoted above, the Post reported that "portions of [the notes] were provided by Ford and reviewed by The Washington Post," suggesting that the reporter physically viewed them.)
Later, Mitchell asked, "Dr. Ford, the Washington Post reported in their Sept. 16 article that you did show them therapist's notes. Is that incorrect?"
"I don't remember physically showing her a note," Ford said, again referring to the Post reporter. "Perhaps my counsel did. I don't — I don't remember physically showing her my copy of the note. I just don't remember. I'm sorry. I have retrieved a physical copy of those medical records."
Ford said she had not shown the notes to anyone else, besides her lawyer. And then, referring specifically to the marriage therapy notes, Mitchell asked, "Would it be fair to say that Brett Kavanaugh's name is not listed in those notes?"
"His name is not listed in those notes," said Ford.
"You also attended individual therapy," Mitchell said. "Did you show any of those notes to the reporter from the Washington Post?"
"Again, I don't remember if I showed her — like, something that I summarized or if I just spoke about it or if she saw it in my counsel's office. I can't — I don't know for sure, but I certainly spoke with her about the 2013 record with the individual therapist."
"And Brett Kavanaugh's name is not in those notes, is that correct?"
"Correct."
If Kavanaugh's name is not in the therapists' notes, how can investigators today be sure that whatever incident Ford told her therapists about was actually an incident involving Kavanaugh? Ford told the Senate that her husband remembered her mentioning the name in their therapy sessions.
"My husband recalls that I named my attacker as Brett Kavanaugh," Ford testified.
"Too ugly to rape" now is it?
What's wrong with you people?
Rest My case, nothing has changed since my post on the 28th.Goodness, she's reading her script, using a croaky voice to intimate mental impacts. From my professional experience appears to be lying through her teeth. I'm no right winger but can see the Clinton Illuminati all over this.
And when it happened they were kids and no real evidence that Kavanaugh was even there.
US absolutely corrupt and stuffed. Just party and save somer silver coins.
Yeah I do. Do you?
Since they didn't get to see it, it'll have to be a she said that, her husband corroborated it but then the honorable Judge said something else. Who are we going to believe, right?
No I thought she had been made up to look haggard, but I was wrong...if you want to suggest she was too ugly to be of interest to a male that's your baggage not mine.
You sound like another bas.
All het up about something that doesn't affect us a bit.
Waste of time really.
Yea, nice try.
We've heard one of these favourite dog whistles haven't we?
Why would a handsome, great man such as I ever rape or sexually assaulted that woman. Just look at her.
Rest My case, nothing has changed since my post on the 28th.
Its all political maneuvering.
Those sucked into threads like this just indicate shallow understanding of life IMHO.
Yep. been through all of that personally. Alone now with ziltch. But I'm only a pup at 73, what would I know.Depends on what you mean by understanding of "life" there.
If you mean thinking that justice could be brought against rich powerful people with richer, more powerful friends... yea, just a waste of time and not really knowing how to world works.
But I'm sure you mean being naive, not recognising it's possible for people to lie, deceive for political or personal gain... I don't think that's true at all.
Firstly, I don't remember any of us suckers saying that Kavanaugh is guilty because Dr Ford alleged it. All that was asked after a credible accusation was for the FBI to look into it.
Apparently they "looked" and talk to people after one Senator said he wouldn't vote for Kavo boy without an FBI report.
I guess he didn't specify what kind of report, and what scope of the investigation is limited to.
So now we got a report. Who gets to see it? Only wise people who definitely are not partisan or political.
----------
As to understanding life, knowing how deprave some people, and some women, could be... trust me, I have seenmu share of it and it still shock me.
I know a guy who got properly trapped, then threatened, then got booked, go to court to answer an alleged rape accusation.
He came out of it losing half of everything he ever had. And lucky he didn't also go to prison.
The guy got taken so bad he was literally penniless he couldn't afford a lawyer when his ex got her lawyer to demand half of a house he bought in his name, that he alone have been paying for ("for them"), half of his super, half of his business and both his balls.
So yea, people can be nasty pieces of work. To assume they all are, to design hearings and investigation where reports are kept hidden and secret; where it's not legally false to say there's no evidence... that's just justice. That's just politics. The kind most don't expect from an open democracy with equal justice for all and all that.
Mate you're off course and being guided by your own bias. You and I are not qualified to identify, let alone apportion guilt to heresay rapists. Have you bothered to look at how she looks when outside the hearings wearing her daily work face?
For some reason you seem all too willing to be part of a lynch mob without knowing the facts ... leave that to people like Bas and hope you never end up accused of anything lest she try the case in the court of petticoats and mass hysteria.
Yep. been through all of that personally. Alone now with ziltch. But I'm only a pup at 73, what would I know.
For goodness sake they were little more than upper wild teenage kids.
Time to move on.
And the US is rotten to the core in so many directions (and all sides of politics), as a youngster witnessed their interference in an internal revolution within Vietnam and they bombed innocents with napalm. Will never forget the raw suffering. For 40 years have been underhandedly attacking Syria and many other countries to control oil, and one can go on. Lol, and under the banner of freedom and democracy and the eyes of God; FF sake
In that context. Yes, this just petty.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?