So all in all I was trading with around 50K in my account, utilizing higher percentage than recommended (about 70%), making on average about 1.5 to 2K per month.
RichieBoy, thanks for your review as a client. When you say you're utilising 70%, would you mind clarifying what you mean? Can you let us know what kind of markets you invest in (just ASX stocks or anything optionable?) and what kind of drawdowns you associate with a losing month?
Sure, by 70% I mean that I invest about 70% of my 50K balance (about 35K)
I am still not sure what this means exactly in the context of naked selling premiums?
What I am trying to figure out is if the positions you are selling are cash secured or not?
I am still yet to see any actual proof in the form of broker statements. Until then, it's all just online talk which means nothing
There are 14 pages to this thread and dozens and dozens of posts, but I have not seen one broker's statement yet. So I made some enquiries and guess what I found? It is actually against the rules to publish a broker's statement because it could be construed as an incentive to invest. And that is definitely against the rules. I am surprised that your moderators and administrators don't know that.
It is actually against the rules to publish a broker's statement because it could be construed as an incentive to invest. And that is definitely against the rules. I am surprised that your moderators and administrators don't know that.
Unfortunately, all this evasiveness and lack of transparency only serves to further bring into question the image of this company, rather than promote or defend it as you seem to be hoping to do.
Couldn't agree more.
I'm always willing to give everyone a fair go but over 10 years with no proof from anyone about their success is really testing my patience....
A shill, also called a plant or a stooge, is a person who publicly helps a person or organization without disclosing that they have a close relationship with the person or organization.
"Shill" typically refers to someone who purposely gives onlookers the impression that they are an enthusiastic independent customer of a seller (or marketer of ideas) for whom they are secretly working. The person or group who hires the shill is using crowd psychology to encourage other onlookers or audience members to purchase the goods or services (or accept the ideas being marketed). Shills are often employed by professional marketing campaigns. "Plant" and "stooge" more commonly refer to any person who is secretly in league with another person or organization while pretending to be neutral or actually a part of the organization he is planted in, such as a magician's audience, a political party, or an intelligence organization (see double agent).
For anyone still considering purchasing Daniel Kertcher’s options course, even after reading Matteo’s comprehensive post, please check out these links that have been provided by contributors to this forum.
http://www.jenman.com.au/news_item.php?id=153
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/personal-f...bjectid=228205
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/n...jectid=3551109
http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2004/s1048152.htm
I'm not sure I agree. I could understand why Daniel, the Company and those associated with it, couldn't share broker statements in isolatation and without abiding by the requirements of their AFSL. However, you're not associated with the Company (and therefore not bound by the AFSL), you're also not giving financial advice (as broker statements are by definition backward looking and inherently useless) and you're not receiving any commission or other incentive to promote Daniel's service so you're not acting as an agent on his behalf. So in short, I can't see any reason why you couldn't share your broker statements.
Unfortunately, all this evasiveness and lack of transparency only serves to further bring into question the image of this company, rather than promote or defend it as you seem to be hoping to do.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?