Wow, you guys don't read too much back in the thread eh??
That was primarily a rhetorical question and partially noting to those who didn't read the link that the targets were not the same as possibly alluded to.
I was in cvn well over 12 months ago and sold out at a bit over 40c with the sp tumbling, Director selling and the market going belly-up. (ok, I missed the market going belly up by a couple of months, I was holding & hoping - but got out before it came crashing down....)
My point - the value placed on a stock by those who are paid to value it is marginal, even irrelevant..... . Sorry, if Hartleys were any good they would have said sell when the Director sold at ~73c.. But then, with the holding they have and being on the payroll that wouldn't have been koshur, would it??
It will trade at what it trades at. Some will read the broker reports and take notice.. These may cause +'ve fluctuations over a day or so as the newbs take a nibble.
They (cvn) are capping production / income at 15k barrels a day. Until they have repeated success in Bo-Rang or another exploration field imo the SP aint going near the projected 'targets'..
Remember the only reason the sp topped 80c was because JP Morgan were taking a serious position (with good reason).. CVN has always been result/announcement driven. It trades up to an ann, then retraces back afterward. JP Morgans' buying pattern bucked that trend but since they stopped buying and started selling, the sp has gradually tumbled downward..
Hartley were tipping $1.00 in the raging bull market 12 months ago with half the production seen today.. POO counteracted by ex rate, double the bopd - additional tax therefore the lower (realistic) price target of 55c..... Still a good buy at anything 20-25 imo.
Cheers
That was primarily a rhetorical question and partially noting to those who didn't read the link that the targets were not the same as possibly alluded to.
I was in cvn well over 12 months ago and sold out at a bit over 40c with the sp tumbling, Director selling and the market going belly-up. (ok, I missed the market going belly up by a couple of months, I was holding & hoping - but got out before it came crashing down....)
My point - the value placed on a stock by those who are paid to value it is marginal, even irrelevant..... . Sorry, if Hartleys were any good they would have said sell when the Director sold at ~73c.. But then, with the holding they have and being on the payroll that wouldn't have been koshur, would it??
It will trade at what it trades at. Some will read the broker reports and take notice.. These may cause +'ve fluctuations over a day or so as the newbs take a nibble.
They (cvn) are capping production / income at 15k barrels a day. Until they have repeated success in Bo-Rang or another exploration field imo the SP aint going near the projected 'targets'..
Remember the only reason the sp topped 80c was because JP Morgan were taking a serious position (with good reason).. CVN has always been result/announcement driven. It trades up to an ann, then retraces back afterward. JP Morgans' buying pattern bucked that trend but since they stopped buying and started selling, the sp has gradually tumbled downward..
Hartley were tipping $1.00 in the raging bull market 12 months ago with half the production seen today.. POO counteracted by ex rate, double the bopd - additional tax therefore the lower (realistic) price target of 55c..... Still a good buy at anything 20-25 imo.
Cheers