- Joined
- 7 December 2006
- Posts
- 254
- Reactions
- 0
hmmm interesting to see pretty similar figures from my quick and dirty method, with the more complete method used on vote no, gives me a little more confidence that I haven't made any major blunders.
The biggest assumption IMO is that the US $ rate is .88 as if CSM put in more currency hedging (like they had for 06/07) then the figures could potentially be much better than either of the calcs show.
I wasn't certain of what price CSM were getting NOW as opposed to the average, for Chromite so decided not to factor that in, could be the main place where the figures differ. actually I just had a closer look and the nickel on vote no has quite a bit of difference to my calcs, but funnily enough overall, they come out remarkably similar!
Cheers,
Tony.
The biggest assumption IMO is that the US $ rate is .88 as if CSM put in more currency hedging (like they had for 06/07) then the figures could potentially be much better than either of the calcs show.
I wasn't certain of what price CSM were getting NOW as opposed to the average, for Chromite so decided not to factor that in, could be the main place where the figures differ. actually I just had a closer look and the nickel on vote no has quite a bit of difference to my calcs, but funnily enough overall, they come out remarkably similar!
Cheers,
Tony.