Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

CQT - Conquest Mining

Hi fellow Conquest holders.
To all the people that bought cqt shares during 2006 do any of you still hold?
If not what price did you sell at and why?
And is there an announcement due in the near future?
Regards Nevie.
 
Nevieboy,

Yes we're waiting on more results from silver hill after the christmas break. In their last ann about silver hill on 13 dec they said

"Conquest Mining Limited (ASX code: CQT) is pleased to announce that drilling at the Silver Hill Deposit has continued to extend the zone of significant mineralisation. Most importantly, a large area of gold mineralisation has been identified as extending east and is limited only by the extent of drilling completed"

Since that time theres been plenty of buying in from everyone. Theres some reputable players in the top 20 shareholders too. Hope this helps.
 
Jimmy001 said:
Nevieboy,

Yes we're waiting on more results from silver hill after the christmas break. In their last ann about silver hill on 13 dec they said

"Conquest Mining Limited (ASX code: CQT) is pleased to announce that drilling at the Silver Hill Deposit has continued to extend the zone of significant mineralisation. Most importantly, a large area of gold mineralisation has been identified as extending east and is limited only by the extent of drilling completed"

Since that time theres been plenty of buying in from everyone. Theres some reputable players in the top 20 shareholders too. Hope this helps.
Thanks for taking the time for a reply Jimmy.
 
nevieboy said:
Hi fellow Conquest holders.
To all the people that bought cqt shares during 2006 do any of you still hold?
If not what price did you sell at and why?
And is there an announcement due in the near future?
Regards Nevie.

Yep I've held for 6 months now. You can see my earlier posts on this thread. They've more than tripled since I bought them. I will continue to hold mainly for tax reasons, If I sell now I'll lose 50% of my profit in tax, if I hold another 6 months tax is halved and with some luck CQT will be even higher.
 
Fantastic ann out this arvo. You know you've got things good when an announcement includes the word "spectacular" lol. Good luck to all holders, don't let go of what you've got.
 
Great announcement - but not much reaction today in the market.
- Maybe it was 'telegraphed' (leaked) a week or so back - and is already factored in to some extent - with the recent SP rises.
Any comments??

Also - Do CQT have a plan/schedule for mine development yet - or are they still just exploring?
 
steven1234 said:
Where did all the sellers come from today??

Why would they want to sell after today's announcement??

The trading theory goes : "Buy the rumour, sell the news".

Whether it is a valid strategy is a very moot point.

Plenty have bought and sold CQT over the past 6 months. Few like me have just kept it.
 
Steven 1234

The only people who need to worry "when" are those trying to trade T1/T2 .... for the rest a little patience is all we need.

Don't loose heart .... I actually love the consolidation at these levels .. especially with such low volumes, these shares are being held very tightly now.

Be prepared to pop the bubbly, (again) ... If the results are as expected, there are going to be some very drunk people up the Isa, and I might wake up a bit shabby myself .... I do expect to double my money (again).

Cheers ... Dave
 
steven1234 said:
It looks like this will break out soon. Does anyone else feel the announcement may be coming on Monday? Or Friday?
Well, the ann is out. Does not seem to drive the shareprice too high though.
 
Oh man!!!
Who - besides me - has been drooling at the sight of the core photo in CQT's ASX announcement (pdf) today!!! :kiffer: (see link below)
Gold - glorious GOLD!! Wouldn't we all love to have some of this dirt in our backyard :D:D

I only got in late on this one - but seeing the drill results - no hesitation - I just wish to hell I had heard of CQT a few months back!!!

http://www.conquestmining.com.au/pdf/308_market_update_9_02_07.pdf
 
Welcome onto the bandwagon Dukey ... better late than never ... there is every chance this will go a lot further than it has travelled in recent months.

Cheers ... Dave


Oh yeah ... DYOR ... blah, blah ...
 
Dukey said:
Oh man!!!
Who - besides me - has been drooling at the sight of the core photo in CQT's ASX announcement (pdf) today!!! :kiffer: (see link below) Gold - glorious GOLD!! Wouldn't we all love to have some of this dirt in our backyard :D:D I only got in late on this one - but seeing the drill results - no hesitation - I just wish to hell I had heard of CQT a few months back!!!
http://www.conquestmining.com.au/pdf/308_market_update_9_02_07.pdf
I remember droooolllling over the cdu photos! I think the attached also brings out the basic drool and GREED! Steady! Must wait for full analysis but I hold small amount as a fun stock. I also hold CDU so what do I know? Zip!
 

Attachments

  • CQT.jpg
    CQT.jpg
    26.1 KB · Views: 131
drmb said:
I remember droooolllling over the cdu photos! I think the attached also brings out the basic drool and GREED! Steady! Must wait for full analysis but I hold small amount as a fun stock. I also hold CDU so what do I know? Zip!

Yeah ... only bought a small parcel and will watch carefully (stops in place) for fear of a retrace after the recent SP doubling. ... But at the same time, fairly confident theres more to come... If that make any sense at all!!
 
gooday all,

new to this stock and indeed to trading itself, so I am combing the internet in an effort to learn a bit more about CQT, mining and making money ;)

good luck to everybody

cheers,
 
What is a "kriged" resource estimate?

Any comments on CQT swapping their Clarke River uranium project (Northern Resources p/l) for 10% of Ellendale Resources?
 
Sorry, ignore that question - just looked it up - but didn't like it much.

Technique is subject to abuse - relies on "a significant degree of spatial dependency" between the ore concentrations in the area Kriged - not a problem if the spatial dependence is not assumed, but verified using "Fishers F test" (?).

On the face of it, interpolating from some "sensational" holes seems unlikely to yield a dissapointing result in either case - Why do it - just spin?
 
Top