- Joined
- 29 January 2006
- Posts
- 7,218
- Reactions
- 4,442
It's hard to make the maths simple but because about 70% of the adult population is fully vaccinated there is a very strong chance that their cohort will increasingly add to all the VAERS categories. This must be the case because a 100% vaccination rate would account for every single adverse event.Doing the rounds is some wacko in Australia doing similar misleading BS with the Department of Health snap shot data.
so who puts out 'the accurate data' .. and THAT is the problem
if they can't get mask guidance correct when do you start believing them
Hah! Pick your echo chamber dude!Well, use the keyboard to go and find out if you are as interested as all that.
state sponsored euthansia ( both the virus response and the vaccine roll-out )
i trust the science , it is the scientists i don't trust
Vax deaths under US's VAERS data can be from anything after they have been vaccinated.So can I get this right? COVID deaths are people who died with COVID and Vax deaths are people died because of the vax...
And its only the fat people who get ill all the rest are fakers... right?
follow the money
i started watching the virus as soon as the Chinese reacted in Wuhan
for those that study Sun Tzu you will know a quote
' all war is based on deception '
no fraud proven in the 2020 election proven yet eitherBig Pharma demagnitised her so their secret plan didn't get discovered.
Woman fails to prove the vaccine made her magnetic
CLEVELAND, Ohio (WOIO) - A woman who identified herself as a nurse practitioner student tried to defend an Ohio doctor’s unproven claim by p...tywkiwdbi.blogspot.com
i DID watch the video
IOW, how many fallacious arguments can I shoe-horn into two short paragraphs?So can I get this right? COVID deaths are people who died with COVID and Vax deaths are people died because of the vax...
And its only the fat people who get ill all the rest are fakers... right?
That someone might no slavishly agree with you?I could not be bothered copying the unsubstantiated drivel which followed but nevertheless thank you for confirming what I believed would be the result.
About 2 cases in a 100 die, so that's not encouraging. Worse, long covid variously affects upward of 10% of all cases and some people infected last year still have not recovered. Death seems inconsistent with your claim.fact 1. the virus was ( officially) discovered in China , in humans and we now know very few people get badly ill from it when they catch it
That's not true at all.... now a Chinese claim is ORIGINALLY Wuhan had TWO different strains , one that was highly damaging and caused a much higher rate of death , and the milder version that has spread around the world ,
About one chance in 50 of dying and greater than one chance in ten of suffering long term symptoms!now given that Sars COV 2 has a very low death rate ( compared to PCR positive tests )
No, patients went into intensive care with a disease of unknown origin in December 2019, so it was never going to be missed.i believe the death rate is well below 1 in 10,000 and 4 or 5 deaths a month in a city like Wuhan would probably go unnoticed unless one of the victims was someone important ( a doctor's relative , or a high-ranking official )
Baseless conspiracy theory anyone?IF the virus was released in China did it come from THAT government lab , China still has some hostile factions internally , and Taiwan is not devoid of talented people , if the virus had of 'escaped' the Chinese are more likely to disappear the responsible people OR publicly execute them as enemies of the state , instead the doctor releasing the find met an untimely death
Absolute bunkum. Your claims are based on what you do not know rather than what anyone looking would be able to find out for themselves.so what we do know is there is more disinformation ( deliberate misdirection ) than accurate information and it isn't just coming from one source ( say , China )
Now you are getting laughable.... since that is the case we MUST assume war (we just aren't sure who is attacking us )
Nope, you have zip knowledge of virology and what you have said is totally removed from reality.... this assumption does NOT rule out a natural virus ( but i am on the man-altered bandwagon , you only had to change 0.1% of an existing virus .. that is what 'gain of function' is all about making the virus a little bit better in a bad way )
If they did, it would be MERS or Ebola and not a virus that had a low case fatality rate.... an enemy could easily hijack a naturally occuring outbreak for their own purposes
I think Mrs and I ***may*** have had it way back in early 2020. There's no way to prove that unless I go and get a swab shoved up my nostril, which I'm not so very keen on having done.well i THINK i had it late December 2019 ( in Brisbane ) , but there was no testing avalable then i hadn't been to Wuhan ( ever ) wouldn't have a clue if i have been in contact with someone who went to Wuhan ( i have never checked everyones passports ) , but PLENTY of Asians at the mall when i was Xmas shopping and a friend stayed over , she was not so well but she came fron Canada and was young and healthy
so by July 2020 someone other people worried they had it so i got the PCR test and months too late of course it tested negitive probably even for the antigen test
now in my health condition you would have thought i would have rushed to hospital , but while it was very unpleasant for two months , i have been much worse at other times ( like the mid 1980's )
following all the 'renegade ' doctors and scientists i think what happened was the cocktail of medications i was already on , was enough to push the needle my way ( the maximum-strength blood-thinners and inhaled steriods should have helped according to discredits physicians )
i should probably put more faith in my currents doctors but the 'acceptable doctors' took 62 years to discover i had major heart damage , and the problem WASN'T in my mind
i think it is amusing now their fixation is trying to talk me into the vaccines LOL after a year and a have of mixing with sick people
( doctors surgeries , hospitals , chemists patholgy labs X-ray clinics ) i have probably already been in contact with the virus ( i have a mask exemption )
Scientific information?I do not expect others to agree with me. Far from it.
A number of responses refuting evidence based scientific information are simply displaying denial psychology at work.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?