Please offer facts about what actually happened, and take your poorly based ideas about me elsewhere.
I deal in facts.Mate.... It's nothing new. There's plenty of corroborating information from different sources relaying the same facts, not from just Chinese ones towing the red line:
https://www.news24.com/World/News/c...s-apology-from-who-chief-for-slander-20200409
https://www.bangkokpost.com/world/1897190/us-criticizes-who-for-ignoring-taiwan-virus-warnings
https://au.glbnews.com/04-2020/52780718458367/
it's really interesting to observe who the CCP shills are on this forum.
It's also interesting to see the correlation with other issues,
Yeah you block when you hit a wall. The actual facts are already all laid out throughout this thread. It's amusing to watch.I deal in facts.
These links from you are not based on facts.
Is it that hard for you to work out the difference, or would you like me to rebut them?
Really?Yeah you block when you hit a wall. The actual facts are already all laid out throughout this thread. It's amusing to watch.
And I posted links, evidence, timelines as have others. You get the same reply when you push the same dead end and often wrong argument.Really?
I consistently ask for evidence in support of claims.
I provide more links than most posters at ASF in support of my posts and am happy to be proven wrong, when I get it wrong, which is inevitable.
I have a number of posters on "ignore" so that I don't waste my time making the same same same same reply. I nevertheless read all their posts in the threads I post in.
Still waiting for anything you can provide that's impartial and credible. I know it'll be hard for you.I deal in facts.
These links from you are not based on facts.
Is it that hard for you to work out the difference, or would you like me to rebut them?
Many of the posts where you include links neglect to include an evidentiary basis, and are strong on opinions.Haven't you been proven wrong enough to still bite
That was exactly my point.Look at all the referenced names and institutions in your links: ("all in China.")
It's actually interesting, mate, how this has exposed the CCP shills.Oh how convenient... and to suppress the voices of, how many (literally thousands?) who were in disapproval of the CCP-line. So now those academics, researchers and doctors are "missing" or killed off.
In relation to what?Still waiting for anything you can provide that's impartial and credible. I know it'll be hard for you.
It's like any little fart that ruffles the red flag or mention that Jinping pongs is tantamount to blasphemy.It's actually interesting, mate, how this has exposed the CCP shills.
Not withstanding the cultural and political traitors we have here on ASF, I have been shocked at some other entities in our society who would rather shill for the CCP than our own culture.
In relation to Taiwan, they sent a letter to WHO that was acknowledgement that it had been received (without reply). Previously posted on this thread.Many of the posts where you include links neglect to include an evidentiary basis, and are strong on opinions.
I tend to ignore comments based on opinions.
In relation to Taiwan, as an example, apart from the government official making a lot of claims, there is nothing I can find that confirms their stance (other than what they said) or that makes sense.
The nature of what was publicly available on 31 December makes clear that of the 27 cases identified to that point in time, "Epidemiological investigation, preliminary laboratory analysis and other aspects of the situation that the above cases are viral pneumonia."
Conspiracy theorists think that Chinese people were being kept in the dark about this issue but, also on 31 December, CCTV made 2 public broadcasts about this infection .
It is inconceivable that any medical expert would not have realised that a SARS-like virus was a likely culprit. Japan certainly made it news on 31 December.
It is to Taiwan's credit that they acted as they did so early in the piece. Korea also quickly recognised the potential threat and took appropriate steps.
Now redo it based on % of population.whacky tv
Where is this letter?In relation to Taiwan, they sent a letter to WHO that was acknowledgement that it had been received (without reply). Previously posted on this thread.
Oh how convenient... and to suppress the voices of, how many (literally thousands?) who were in disapproval of the CCP-line. So now those academics, researchers and doctors are "missing" or killed off.
Now redo it based on % of population.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?