- Joined
- 29 January 2006
- Posts
- 7,218
- Reactions
- 4,442
The detailed data are found here.Sorry must have deleted half the post.
Did they identify omicron as the cause of fatalities?
Where did this chart link from?
Open letter from The BMJ to Mark ZuckerbergDear Mark Zuckerberg,We are Fiona Godlee and Kamran Abbasi, editors of The BMJ, one of the world’s oldest and most influential general medical journals. We are writing to raise serious concerns about the “fact checking” being undertaken by third party providers on behalf of Facebook/Meta.In September, a former employee of Ventavia, a contract research company helping carry out the main Pfizer covid-19 vaccine trial, began providing The BMJ with dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails. These materials revealed a host of poor clinical trial research practices occurring at Ventavia that could impact data integrity and patient safety. We also discovered that, despite receiving a direct complaint about these problems over a year ago, the FDA did not inspect Ventavia’s trial sites.The BMJ commissioned an investigative reporter to write up the story for our journal. The article was published on 2 November, following legal review, external peer review and subject to The BMJ’s usual high level editorial oversight and review.[1]But from November 10, readers began reporting a variety of problems when trying to share our article. Some reported being unable to share it. Many others reported having their posts flagged with a warning about “Missing context … Independent fact-checkers say this information could mislead people.” Those trying to post the article were informed by Facebook that people who repeatedly share “false information” might have their posts moved lower in Facebook’s News Feed. Group administrators where the article was shared received messages from Facebook informing them that such posts were “partly false.”Readers were directed to a “fact check” performed by a Facebook contractor named Lead Stories.[2]We find the “fact check” performed by Lead Stories to be inaccurate, incompetent and irresponsible.— It fails to provide any assertions of fact that The BMJ article got wrong— It has a nonsensical title: “Fact Check: The British Medical Journal Did NOT Reveal Disqualifying And Ignored Reports Of Flaws In Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Trials”— The first paragraph inaccurately labels The BMJ a “news blog”— It contains a screenshot of our article with a stamp over it stating “Flaws Reviewed,” despite the Lead Stories article not identifying anything false or untrue in The BMJ article— It published the story on its website under a URL that contains the phrase “hoax-alert”We have contacted Lead Stories, but they refuse to change anything about their article or actions that have led to Facebook flagging our article.We have also contacted Facebook directly, requesting immediate removal of the “fact checking” label and any link to the Lead Stories article, thereby allowing our readers to freely share the article on your platform.There is also a wider concern that we wish to raise. We are aware that The BMJ is not the only high quality information provider to have been affected by the incompetence of Meta’s fact checking regime. To give one other example, we would highlight the treatment by Instagram (also owned by Meta) of Cochrane, the international provider of high quality systematic reviews of the medical evidence.[3] Rather than investing a proportion of Meta’s substantial profits to help ensure the accuracy of medical information shared through social media, you have apparently delegated responsibility to people incompetent in carrying out this crucial task. Fact checking has been a staple of good journalism for decades. What has happened in this instance should be of concern to anyone who values and relies on sources such as The BMJ.
MickWe hope you will act swiftly: specifically to correct the error relating to The BMJ’s article and to review the processes that led to the error; and generally to reconsider your investment in and approach to fact checking overall.
Best wishes,
Fiona Godlee, editor in chief
Kamran Abbasi, incoming editor in chief
The BMJ
Competing interests:
As current and incoming editors in chief, we are responsible for everything The BMJ contains.
References:
[1] Thacker PD. Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial. BMJ. 2021 Nov 2;375:n2635. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2635. PMID: 34728500. https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635
[2] Miller D. Fact Check: The British Medical Journal Did NOT Reveal Disqualifying And Ignored Reports Of Flaws In Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Trials. Nov 10, 2021. https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2021/11/fact-check-british-medical-jo…
[3]
Are we waking up yet, sheeple?
Great way to actually catch the Moronic. Really dumb sh¹t IMO.View attachment 134681Sky News Journo gets reality check
Thought you would be too busy this time of the year...........helping SantaGreat way to actually catch the Moronic. Really dumb sh¹t IMO.
Nah, it too farkin' hot. I'm inventing excuses.Thought you would be too busy this time of the year...........helping Santa
YepWA is just delaying the inevitable. QLd is finding out the slow way, WA even slower...
We are all going to catch Covid-19 one way or another. Part and parcel of living in a global community and a highly infectious virus. That's life.
Whilst true, the real lesson humans need to learn is that the "global community" bit is the actual weapon of mass destruction when it comes to this sort of thing.We are all going to catch Covid-19 one way or another. Part and parcel of living in a global community and a highly infectious virus. That's life.
Dominic Perrottet has woken up on the effects of a totally out of control Omicron infection on NSW.
Dominic Perrottet has woken up on the effects of a totally out of control Omicron infection on NSW.
Dominic Perrottet has finally realised that ‘letting it rip’ comes at too high a cost – for all of us
Anne Davies
View attachment 134712
The pro-business premier eased restrictions and ‘opened up’ the NSW economy but staff are ill or isolating while customers are staying at home
View attachment 134713
Perhaps NSW premier Dominic Perrottet has sensed the public mood, finally. It’s one of worry. Photograph: Mick Tsikas/AAP
Thu 23 Dec 2021 19.14 AEDT
First published on Thu 23 Dec 2021 19.02 AED
New South Wales’s laissez-faire premier, Dominic Perrottet, has found himself mugged by reality on the cusp of Christmas.
Here are the grim statistics that tell us what is happening in NSW: 5,715 new cases reported on Thursday; 1,500 health workers sick or isolating (leaving the health system even more stressed); rising Covid cases in ICU and nearly 150,000 people a day lining up to get tested.
Yes, some of these are travellers, who are required to be tested by other states. But most are people who worry they have been exposed and are now wondering whether they should attend Christmas Day with parents or grandparents.
In the three weeks since the Omicron variant was first detected here on 28 November, Perrottet has been telling us to go out and spend, head to the pub, get back to normal.
Dominic Perrottet has finally realised that ‘letting it rip’ comes at too high a cost | Anne Davies
The pro-business premier eased restrictions and ‘opened up’ the NSW economy but staff are ill or isolating while customers are staying at homewww.theguardian.com
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?