I am not convinced that CO2 emmissions has anything to do with Global Warming, oops sorry it is now Climate Change since the ALARMIST have been proven wrong. The globe is actually cooling according to the latest statistics.I'm so glad to see such a valuable contribution. Thank you!:
I am not convinced that CO2 emmissions has anything to do with Global Warming, oops sorry it is now Climate Change since the ALARMIST have been proven wrong. The globe is actually cooling according to the latest statistics.
I have travelled the world and yes there are places in need pollution control purely for local inhabitants health; Thailand, Manila, Beijing just to name a few.
The ETS that the Labor Party are trying to sell is fraudulent to say the least. It is nothing more than a gigantic tax grab and will do absoluty nothing to reduce CO2 emmissions. The only thing it will do is affect your hip pocket.
You don't have to be uni graduate or a rocket scientist to work that out.
The GHG impact from the bags themselves. But there are a lot of scenarios where the GHG impact from not having them is significant which, on balance, suggests that a ban on bags would result in an overall increase in emissions.A while ago i actually tried to find out what the the GHG impact of plastic bags was...After a lot of digging, eventually came to the conclusion it was pretty much irrelevant.
Agreed that, in theory, thorium reactors have a lot of advantages over fossil fuels and conventional nuclear (uranium) reactors. There's still some impact on the environment though, there ain't no free ride in the energy game, but agreed they'd be a massive improvement over coal, oil, gas or uranium. How they compare with solar, wind, hydro, geothermal etc is harder to assess since the nature of impacts is very different.Taking into account all the impacts and limitations of all the available power generation technologies...the liquid-fluoride thorium reactor LFTR has to come out on top...ill cut and paste the important bits.
Article from: The Australian
AUSTRALIA is on track for a record hot August, and this winter is likely to be the hottest on record as well.
Has Northern-hemisphere Pollution Affected Australian Rainfall?
ScienceDaily (Aug. 26, 2009) ”” New research announced at the international Water in a Changing Climate science conference in Melbourne, 24-28 August, implicates pollution from Asia, Europe and North America as a contributor to recent Australian rainfall changes. Australian scientists using a climate model that includes a treatment of tiny particles – or aerosols – report that the build up of these particles in the northern hemisphere affects their simulation of recent climate change in the southern hemisphere, including rainfall in Australia.
The CSIRO climate model, which can include the effects of aerosols caused by humans, suggests that aerosols – whose major sources are in the northern hemisphere – can drive changes in atmospheric and oceanic circulation in the southern hemisphere. Their model results suggest that human-generated aerosols from the northern hemisphere may have contributed to increased rainfall in north-western and central Australia, and decreased rainfall in parts of southern Australia.
Lead researcher, Dr Leon Rotstayn, Principal Research Scientist at the Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research, a partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology, said: “Perhaps surprisingly, inclusion of northern hemisphere aerosols may be important for accurate modelling of Australian climate change.”
Aerosols come from many different sources. Sulphur is released when we burn coal and oil. More dust, also an aerosol, circulates in the atmosphere when land is cleared, burned or overgrazed. Some aerosols occur naturally like sea spray and volcanic emissions, but NASA estimates ten percent of the total aerosols in the atmosphere are caused by people. Most of this ten percent is in the northern hemisphere.
European researchers also attending the conference will discuss a new forecasting service that will identify in unprecedented detail where these aerosols are coming from and where they are going.
The new service, part of Europe’s Global Monitoring for Environment and Security (GMES) initiative, will give global information on how pollutants move around the world across oceans and continents, and will refine estimates of their sources and sinks.
Dr Adrian Simmons from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, which is coordinating the multi-institution initiative, says: “The service will give much more detailed forecast information on air quality over Europe and provide the basis for better health advice across Europe and beyond”. The service has clear implications for environmental policy and legislation.
The five-day conference, organised by the Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment (GEWEX) and the Integrated Land Ecosystem-Atmosphere Processes Study (iLEAPS) and locally hosted by Monash University, brings together many of the world’s leading experts to discuss the important processes that govern water availability and drought and their role in present and future climate and global change.
Professor Christian Jakob, who holds the Chair for Climate Modelling at Monash University and who chairs the local organising committee for the conference says: “It is fantastic to have attracted more than 350 researchers from more than 15 countries to come to Australia to discuss these very timely issues with us here in Melbourne.”
“The exchanges of energy, carbon and water between the land, ocean and atmosphere are of utmost importance to current and future climate. The fundamental role of the land surface, clouds, aerosols and of course rainfall for climate has been highlighted many times in the reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). This conference will advance our knowledge in all these important areas by bringing world-leading experts together for a week of discussions. It has been a great privilege for me and Monash University to host this event,” he added.
The conference brings together the work of two major international research projects: GEWEX and iLEAPS. These projects complement each other and collaborate in a variety of global-change and climate-change research
This ETS Tax is going to bugger the country and be a politically correct burden on the shoulders of succeeding generations.
What a dose of trots are the Wongs and the Rudds of this world.
Nerds seem to have taken over our government.
Soul less , humourless, nerds.
gg
This ETS Tax is going to bugger the country and be a politically correct burden on the shoulders of succeeding generations.
What a dose of trots are the Wongs and the Rudds of this world.
Nerds seem to have taken over our government.
Soul less , humourless, nerds.
gg
GG,This ETS Tax is going to bugger the country and be a politically correct burden on the shoulders of succeeding generations.
What a dose of trots are the Wongs and the Rudds of this world.
Nerds seem to have taken over our government.
Soul less , humourless, nerds.
gg
So if it would pick up his ratings and deliver better things to him then why doesn't he do it? Perhaps there is something globally powerful driving this thing.GG, I reckon if Malcolm Turnbull should followed the Nats and several of his Liberal MP's, do a 180 degree turn on this ETS and his ratings would go up 10 or 20 points.
The SCEPTICS are gaining in momentum, the average JOE BLOW are starting to wake up to RUDD and WONG for the frauds they are. They have to be stopped.
Economically speaking I corrected my error above.GG,
Good points.
It's effective to ask what the invisible hand is.
So if it would pick up his ratings and deliver better things to him then why doesn't he do it? Perhaps there is something globally powerful driving this thing.
Muppets.
I was thinking of something considerably more profane.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?