- Joined
- 14 February 2005
- Posts
- 15,376
- Reactions
- 17,760
Underlying energy demand seems much stronger than I think many realise.There are some really big numbers being projected for oil
What do you read in this?The market had a fast spike lower:
View attachment 123166
Why?
It's what markets do. There will be all manner of causal explanations post hoc. All just noise.
View attachment 123164
The defensive end (absent XLI) held up or are holding up currently, better than the leadership sectors. Although if the decline continues, I'm sure they'll join in also.
View attachment 123165
Does the falling EMA help us out? No idea. My guess is we go through it before coming back down.
Mr flippe-floppe-flye:
View attachment 123163
Right now (as in for the next couple of hours), it's an algo market. There will be wild price swings, lower, higher, as the machines trade with each other. Human traders (if they are smart or have seen this before will just grab a coffee and be entertained) should avoid trying to trade the market until the machines ramp down.
The thing with a fast market is that it is pure noise for the most part, 90%+. There is a little signal in there, but you won't see it until the machines take an oil break and prices calm down. The interesting thing is whether the newer retail traders try and day trade in this market, long or short, thinking that their sh***y platforms can outperform the machines, located within the exchanges and latencies of milli-seconds. I just placed a trade (sell order) prior to this post and was executed $0.08 higher than my limit. Why? Pure luck and a machine running the price higher at that moment. A minute later, the price was $0.15 below my limit. This is in a sedate ETF that was in the leadership today XLRE.
Current:
View attachment 123167
We'll have to wait and see if the market calms down a bit now. If it doesn't and the decline maintains its momentum into the close, there will be some very nervous market participants for tomorrow's market heading into the w/e.
jog on
duc
What do you read in this?
View attachment 123168
Since logged this morning Russell 2000 has been green whereas the major indexes are deep in red.
Could it be that trading robots do not deal with Russell 2000 tickets as too small,?
Thanks,is there a way to measure machine trading ratio reliably?Essentially yes.
View attachment 123169
The machines need a lot of liquidity in the actual stocks themselves as they are not just trading say the futures contract for 'X', but also a basket of stocks associated with that futures contract.
So they might buy 1000 futures on NASDAQ and sell 50 million shares (or whatever) on a basket of NASDAQ stocks, the idea being that the stocks fall a little bit more than the index. There are so many different ways that they do it. Some just follow and front run the momentum, executing customer orders before the customer and then filling the order to the customer scalping a penny or two. To do that, you need liquidity and plenty of it.
You can't compete with their speed. Day traders require fast executions, especially if you are only really scalping pennies. When the machines get busy in a fast market, you have to step aside.
jog on
duc
Thanks,is there a way to measure machine trading ratio reliably?
That's an interesting indicator
Thank youYes there is.
Most brokerages run a TICKI program. Essentially it measures the Dow Industrials (only 30 stocks and all have deep liquidity) for buying/selling pressure.
So at an extreme buying the most that can show is +30. The least (-30). If it is +22/(-22) there is an active algo playing (with size) in the market. Most times, it is transient, only lasts a few seconds.
Today however, for whatever reason, they all came out to play and hung around for a while.
The duc wanted to trade today as well (of all days). So I took a deep breath and waded in. As I was interested in the sedate end of the market, not too bad. I also opened a position in SLV. Got a pretty decent fill. Obviously commodities were not on their radar today or they had already finished for the day.
View attachment 123170
jog on
duc
Surprised to see US up on a Friday.Start with the oil news:
Oil prices held on at the end of the week, set to close out mostly flat from a week earlier. Oil prices are trapped between horrific downside risks, mostly in India, offset by growing optimism in the U.S. and to a lesser extent in Europe.
India’s oil demand in doubt. India posted several days of record-setting Covid-19 cases, and Bloomberg reports that demand for fuels could plunge by 20% in April. “Given the grim situation, it’s likely that the lockdowns could be in place for several weeks or even a couple of months,” said Senthil Kumaran, head of South Asia oil at industry consultant FGE. “India’s total key oil products demand will see a significant pullback.”
Biden pledges 50-52% cut in GHG; other countries up commitments. President Biden announced a goal of cutting emissions by 50-52% by 2030 at the climate summit on Thursday. Canada boosted its target from a 30% cut to a 40-45% cut. Japan raised its target to 46%, up from 26%.
Natural gas rally over. Bank of America said that natural gas “throws in the towel,” noting that the month of March saw weaker-than-expected industrial demand and warm weather, leading inventories to end the month at 1.78 trillion cubic feet, higher than anticipated, which erased the inventory deficit relative to the five-year average.
Natural gas production on the rise. Even as demand hit a lull, production in natural gas is ramping back up after a roughly 18-month hiatus. Rystad Energy came out with a note predicting strong production gains for the next three years and beyond. Both Rystad and Bank of America said the Haynesville shale, in particular, is looking strong.
China promises pullback on coal. China’s Xi Jinping said that China would “strictly limit” coal consumption over the next five years and then begin phasing it out after that.
U.S. Senate to repeal methane rollback. The U.S. Senate will repeal the Trump-era pullback on methane regulations next week.
New York sues Big Oil. New York City sued ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM), BP (NYSE: BP) and Royal Dutch Shell (NYSE: RDS.A) for deceptive ads claiming their products were “emissions-reducing.”
Chevron lobbies U.S. against Myanmar sanctions. The New York Times reports that Chevron (NYSE: CVX) is lobbying the U.S. government to not place sanctions on Myanmar, following the military coup and brutal crackdown that has unfolded in the country since February. Chevron operates a large natural gas project in the country along with Total (NYSE: TOT).
White House reveals climate finance strategy. The White House unveiled its international climate finance strategy, which includes pushing lending arms of the government – U.S. International Development Finance Corporation, the Millennium Challenge Corporation and the Export-Import Bank – to virtually eliminate fossil fuel lending, except in extraordinary circumstances.
Small companies buy Big Oil’s assets. The supermajors are pledging billions in low-carbon energy investments and committing to net-zero goals over the next decade. Meanwhile, smaller oil and gas companies are snapping up the shed assets.
Are peak demand forecasts accurate? Goldman Sachs believes oil demand will peak in 2026, while BP Plc believes the highest global demand growth is already over, and International Energy Agency (IEA) thinks the peak could come later, in 2030. However it’s framed, it is clear that the oil and gas industry is facing a turbulent future.
UN-backed climate finance group managing $70 trillion announced. The Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ), a UN-backed group of assets managers, banks, investors, and insurers launched this week. The group's 160-plus members are responsible for over $70 trillion in assets, and “will work to mobilise the trillions of dollars necessary to build a global zero emissions economy and deliver the goals of the Paris Agreement," the announcement states. Participants include Barclays, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup, Munich Re, the Zurich Insurance Group and many others.
California to ban new fracking permits. California Gov. Gavin Newsom is expected to announce a ban on new fracking projects beginning in 2024.
Lithium era just beginning. It’s been a big week for lithium, with a multi-billion-dollar mega-merger, a new major production deal in Chile, and funding for Europe’s first large-scale lithium refinery in Chile. Things are looking up for the vital battery metal.
Halliburton sank on “moderating” fracking forecast. Halliburton (NYSE: HAL) beat the consensus on earnings but saw its share price sink after it said that it expects fracking activity to moderate in the U.S. in the second quarter.
Total terminating contracts in Mozambique. As militant attacks show no signs of going away, Total (NYSE: TOT) is terminating contracts with some companies in Mozambique related to its $20 billion LNG export project. Analysts say the delay on the project could be at least a year.
Biden admin unwinds Trump auto policy. The Biden administration will restore the authority to California to set its own fuel economy standards tighter than federal standards, following the Trump administration’s effort to repeal that authority.
Public lands drilling pause extended. The U.S. Department of Interior extended its drilling pause on federal lands through June, a policy that mostly only affects the southeastern corner of New Mexico.
12 states call for ICE ban. 12 U.S. states called on the federal government to ban the sale of gasoline-powered vehicles by 2035.
Kinder Morgan $1 billion Texas windfall. Kinder Morgan (NYSE: KMI) said that it took in a $1 billion windfall from the Texas electricity crisis in February. “[W]e view KMI’s large beat as a ‘zero-sum-game,’ meaning someone (i.e. buyers of the gas) had to pay the bill, which could make for some interesting utility earnings calls,” Citigroup said.
At week end:
Well the dip was aggressively bought. To get it, your timing would need to be absolutely perfect, buying the close yesterday.
View attachment 123236
Overall for the week, the defensive sectors of the market were the place to be.
View attachment 123229
Reflected:
View attachment 123230
View attachment 123231View attachment 123232
The still remaining question of inflation. Will it run hot or just right or not at all? At the moment, it is heating up from cold to tepid. Whether it makes the transition to warm and onto hot, we'll just have to wait and see. Certainly if the Fed has any say in the matter it will move to hot...then it remains to be seen if they can prevent it from boiling over.
View attachment 123233
$TNX looks as if it has found short term support to move to higher yields on the daily.
View attachment 123234
On the weekly, not so much:
View attachment 123235
The stock market is (obviously) trading on the weekly and that rates will continue to (a) decline or (b) go nowhere for a while: ie. correct through time.
BTC:
I put this chart up in the BTC Bulls thread. Ignored.
Which rather infers their mindset and bias. Simply on a chart basis, BTC has run far and hard. We know (in the past) that it has demonstrated a propensity to return to the 50EMA at some point. Sometimes earlier, sometimes later. This would (could) be the later return. If so, that takes it to either a 20 handle or (total panic) an 11 handle.
View attachment 123226
Mr flippe-floppe-flye has been true to his name:
View attachment 123227
View attachment 123228
There are still divergences within the stock market in breadth, but, not important obviously to the BTD crowd. April is certainly living up to its seasonality projection, in fact (which is why I start the month with the seasonality projection) each month this year has followed its script almost to perfection.
I raise this issue simply because @peter2 and @Skate have touched on seasonality in their respective threads in the past 24hrs or so. All manner of analysts will follow cycles and cyclical theories, many very successful and intelligent (Felix Zulaf). The 'Sell in May and go away' is mentioned (Peter & Skate) and Mr Skate identifies the Sept/Oct period as being particularly dangerous (in the past) to his systems driven approach.
So examining this for a moment:
View attachment 123237
What I do know is that the Sept/Oct. period was/is harvest time in the US. Historically, the banking system used to extend finance to farmers during this period, pulling back the availability of margin loans to the stock market. Absent margin to (presumably) BTD, declines would run far deeper in this period. Savvy stock market (manipulators) players would, at this time launch co-ordinated bear raids pushing the market lower aided by margin calls.
Seasonality was definitely a thing. Whether (or how much) it remains a thing, I am informally keeping track of, as can anyone simply by collecting the seasonality data as we progress through the year.
Which makes we curious: we have currently (in April) some really messy charts, many areas are overextended. Internals are horrible. Yet, the market has simply refused to break more than say 2%. May as a seasonality is not good (see start of this thread). April is 100% up. Yes 100% up. It is living to expectation so far. May however is a different story, not terrible, but less than April. June/July both 100%. Exit for the 3 worst months: Aug/Sept/Oct. Re-enter Nov/Dec.
I'd be interested to see a systems chap test it. It is supposed not to work.
jog on
duc
1. New Bull markets, demonstrate just how far a bull can run before it runs out of steam.
2. Many are taking positions based on their 'beliefs'.
3. Some are sitting out waiting to see. At some point, markets will resolve in one direction.
4. The spectators miss the opening move and wait for a pullback to jump on.
5. The pullback to the b/o point never materialises. It just keeps moving higher fuelled by those closing losing positions.
Something everyone with an interest in gas should always remember is that it's a regional market far more than it's a global one.Natural gas rally over. Bank of America said that natural gas “throws in the towel,
I wish you were right Mr SkateThis is the very reason why we are all rolling in it at the moment
A long post: bear with me:Surprised to see US up on a Friday.
For a systematic exit in the bad months you need to use a quick ramp up strategy otherwise you basically miss nearly 5 months of the year .
If i have time , will try a backtest comparison of a full exit then reenter for that period.
Have all a great weekend
Great post, analysis and comments !!Start with the oil news:
Oil prices held on at the end of the week, set to close out mostly flat from a week earlier. Oil prices are trapped between horrific downside risks, mostly in India, offset by growing optimism in the U.S. and to a lesser extent in Europe.
India’s oil demand in doubt. India posted several days of record-setting Covid-19 cases, and Bloomberg reports that demand for fuels could plunge by 20% in April. “Given the grim situation, it’s likely that the lockdowns could be in place for several weeks or even a couple of months,” said Senthil Kumaran, head of South Asia oil at industry consultant FGE. “India’s total key oil products demand will see a significant pullback.”
Biden pledges 50-52% cut in GHG; other countries up commitments. President Biden announced a goal of cutting emissions by 50-52% by 2030 at the climate summit on Thursday. Canada boosted its target from a 30% cut to a 40-45% cut. Japan raised its target to 46%, up from 26%.
Natural gas rally over. Bank of America said that natural gas “throws in the towel,” noting that the month of March saw weaker-than-expected industrial demand and warm weather, leading inventories to end the month at 1.78 trillion cubic feet, higher than anticipated, which erased the inventory deficit relative to the five-year average.
Natural gas production on the rise. Even as demand hit a lull, production in natural gas is ramping back up after a roughly 18-month hiatus. Rystad Energy came out with a note predicting strong production gains for the next three years and beyond. Both Rystad and Bank of America said the Haynesville shale, in particular, is looking strong.
China promises pullback on coal. China’s Xi Jinping said that China would “strictly limit” coal consumption over the next five years and then begin phasing it out after that.
U.S. Senate to repeal methane rollback. The U.S. Senate will repeal the Trump-era pullback on methane regulations next week.
New York sues Big Oil. New York City sued ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM), BP (NYSE: BP) and Royal Dutch Shell (NYSE: RDS.A) for deceptive ads claiming their products were “emissions-reducing.”
Chevron lobbies U.S. against Myanmar sanctions. The New York Times reports that Chevron (NYSE: CVX) is lobbying the U.S. government to not place sanctions on Myanmar, following the military coup and brutal crackdown that has unfolded in the country since February. Chevron operates a large natural gas project in the country along with Total (NYSE: TOT).
White House reveals climate finance strategy. The White House unveiled its international climate finance strategy, which includes pushing lending arms of the government – U.S. International Development Finance Corporation, the Millennium Challenge Corporation and the Export-Import Bank – to virtually eliminate fossil fuel lending, except in extraordinary circumstances.
Small companies buy Big Oil’s assets. The supermajors are pledging billions in low-carbon energy investments and committing to net-zero goals over the next decade. Meanwhile, smaller oil and gas companies are snapping up the shed assets.
Are peak demand forecasts accurate? Goldman Sachs believes oil demand will peak in 2026, while BP Plc believes the highest global demand growth is already over, and International Energy Agency (IEA) thinks the peak could come later, in 2030. However it’s framed, it is clear that the oil and gas industry is facing a turbulent future.
UN-backed climate finance group managing $70 trillion announced. The Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ), a UN-backed group of assets managers, banks, investors, and insurers launched this week. The group's 160-plus members are responsible for over $70 trillion in assets, and “will work to mobilise the trillions of dollars necessary to build a global zero emissions economy and deliver the goals of the Paris Agreement," the announcement states. Participants include Barclays, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup, Munich Re, the Zurich Insurance Group and many others.
California to ban new fracking permits. California Gov. Gavin Newsom is expected to announce a ban on new fracking projects beginning in 2024.
Lithium era just beginning. It’s been a big week for lithium, with a multi-billion-dollar mega-merger, a new major production deal in Chile, and funding for Europe’s first large-scale lithium refinery in Chile. Things are looking up for the vital battery metal.
Halliburton sank on “moderating” fracking forecast. Halliburton (NYSE: HAL) beat the consensus on earnings but saw its share price sink after it said that it expects fracking activity to moderate in the U.S. in the second quarter.
Total terminating contracts in Mozambique. As militant attacks show no signs of going away, Total (NYSE: TOT) is terminating contracts with some companies in Mozambique related to its $20 billion LNG export project. Analysts say the delay on the project could be at least a year.
Biden admin unwinds Trump auto policy. The Biden administration will restore the authority to California to set its own fuel economy standards tighter than federal standards, following the Trump administration’s effort to repeal that authority.
Public lands drilling pause extended. The U.S. Department of Interior extended its drilling pause on federal lands through June, a policy that mostly only affects the southeastern corner of New Mexico.
12 states call for ICE ban. 12 U.S. states called on the federal government to ban the sale of gasoline-powered vehicles by 2035.
Kinder Morgan $1 billion Texas windfall. Kinder Morgan (NYSE: KMI) said that it took in a $1 billion windfall from the Texas electricity crisis in February. “[W]e view KMI’s large beat as a ‘zero-sum-game,’ meaning someone (i.e. buyers of the gas) had to pay the bill, which could make for some interesting utility earnings calls,” Citigroup said.
At week end:
Well the dip was aggressively bought. To get it, your timing would need to be absolutely perfect, buying the close yesterday.
View attachment 123236
Overall for the week, the defensive sectors of the market were the place to be.
View attachment 123229
Reflected:
View attachment 123230
View attachment 123231View attachment 123232
The still remaining question of inflation. Will it run hot or just right or not at all? At the moment, it is heating up from cold to tepid. Whether it makes the transition to warm and onto hot, we'll just have to wait and see. Certainly if the Fed has any say in the matter it will move to hot...then it remains to be seen if they can prevent it from boiling over.
View attachment 123233
$TNX looks as if it has found short term support to move to higher yields on the daily.
View attachment 123234
On the weekly, not so much:
View attachment 123235
The stock market is (obviously) trading on the weekly and that rates will continue to (a) decline or (b) go nowhere for a while: ie. correct through time.
BTC:
I put this chart up in the BTC Bulls thread. Ignored.
Which rather infers their mindset and bias. Simply on a chart basis, BTC has run far and hard. We know (in the past) that it has demonstrated a propensity to return to the 50EMA at some point. Sometimes earlier, sometimes later. This would (could) be the later return. If so, that takes it to either a 20 handle or (total panic) an 11 handle.
View attachment 123226
Mr flippe-floppe-flye has been true to his name:
View attachment 123227
View attachment 123228
There are still divergences within the stock market in breadth, but, not important obviously to the BTD crowd. April is certainly living up to its seasonality projection, in fact (which is why I start the month with the seasonality projection) each month this year has followed its script almost to perfection.
I raise this issue simply because @peter2 and @Skate have touched on seasonality in their respective threads in the past 24hrs or so. All manner of analysts will follow cycles and cyclical theories, many very successful and intelligent (Felix Zulaf). The 'Sell in May and go away' is mentioned (Peter & Skate) and Mr Skate identifies the Sept/Oct period as being particularly dangerous (in the past) to his systems driven approach.
So examining this for a moment:
View attachment 123237
What I do know is that the Sept/Oct. period was/is harvest time in the US. Historically, the banking system used to extend finance to farmers during this period, pulling back the availability of margin loans to the stock market. Absent margin to (presumably) BTD, declines would run far deeper in this period. Savvy stock market (manipulators) players would, at this time launch co-ordinated bear raids pushing the market lower aided by margin calls.
Seasonality was definitely a thing. Whether (or how much) it remains a thing, I am informally keeping track of, as can anyone simply by collecting the seasonality data as we progress through the year.
Which makes we curious: we have currently (in April) some really messy charts, many areas are overextended. Internals are horrible. Yet, the market has simply refused to break more than say 2%. May as a seasonality is not good (see start of this thread). April is 100% up. Yes 100% up. It is living to expectation so far. May however is a different story, not terrible, but less than April. June/July both 100%. Exit for the 3 worst months: Aug/Sept/Oct. Re-enter Nov/Dec.
I'd be interested to see a systems chap test it. It is supposed not to work.
jog on
duc
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?