I actually like dollar cost averaging. So if this is a preferred strategy, then yes, 2% is low and you can do much better. Here are some examples:
So you would go here: https://etfdb.com/
As an example I have selected:
View attachment 120124View attachment 120125View attachment 120126
Now reading the blurb, we see that this is an actively managed fund. Might be good, might be not so good down the road. A risk to evaluate. The dividend at 12% is attractive. In part it is attractive because 'Preferred' stock and 'Convertibles' sit higher in the capital structure than equity. This (in theory) should fluctuate less than equity. From a DCA point of view, this might not be as attractive, as you may want greater range in the fluctuations. It may be more attractive. Individual choice.
Then you can explore here:
FINVIZ.com - Stock Screener
Stock screener for investors and traders, financial visualizations.finviz.com
View attachment 120127View attachment 120128View attachment 120129View attachment 120130
So the 2 examples that I picked are simply random from the generated search. Both resources are free. Both will provide you with plenty of possible candidates.
In short, yes you can do far better than 2%, while maintaining many of the qualities that were attractive in your original choice.
jog on
duc
Thank you again. I will do some more research and look into the links provided . I guess I stuck with the vanguard ETF for the low maintenance cost/s. I read through the little book of common sense investing and they were suggesting the low costs over time would be the winner. But at 2% I guess there are better choices out there, thanks heaps.