- Joined
- 11 September 2014
- Posts
- 77
- Reactions
- 0
To give an alternative view (which is actually I believe the mainstream view) is that the butterfly pattern doesn't work and can only fit after the fact. If it doesn't work people just say it wasn't a butterfly pattern because it didn't meet the complex and specific criteria and if it does people say "there ya go, it works!".
I think most people looking at that chart wouldn't say that's very bullish. You may get a secondary reaction if the market is oversold, but to call a bottom there at this point in time is a fool's dream.
Also, if we think about it logically, doesn't the business depend on commodity prices being up? If that's the case then don't you really need the bullish confirmation in the related markets?
To give an alternative view (which is actually I believe the mainstream view) is that the butterfly pattern doesn't work and can only fit after the fact. If it doesn't work people just say it wasn't a butterfly pattern because it didn't meet the complex and specific criteria and if it does people say "there ya go, it works!".
Its different this time
As for being in a super cycle, well nobody knows.... Just trade the opportunities when they come, get out early if you are wrong and wait for the next setup and keep a level head.
As for being in a super cycle, well nobody knows....
I thinks it's appropriate to call it a super cycle
~
You can find out the historical figures from the Full-Year Reports.I have had a look on google but find what I am after. What percentage of BHP assets are oil and gas? Or would it better to ask what percentage of profits come from the oil and gas sector?
You can find out the historical figures from the Full-Year Reports.
For 2015 (and 2014 comparatives) try the Report released on 25 August 2015. There's a pretty good summary on about page 14 and some sector discussions onwards from there.
Just be careful - the prices of commodities have probably moved significantly enough since then to complete change a lot of the inputs.
You only know it's a super cycle when it completes relative to earlier super cycles. Only problem is these are always expanding and contracting both in time and amplitude. Just when you think your onto something they even miss a beat and invert just to make you crazy.....
Personally I don't use them. I find delta a much better alternative, although it too exhibits inversions it's a more robust approach. For instance the 2 charts attached for super long term is 19.05 years for 1 cycle. Each coloured vertical line occurs 19.05 years relative to the preceding one of the some colour. Within this we have points in time that are highs and lows that occurred during each cycle.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.