- Joined
- 21 March 2009
- Posts
- 21
- Reactions
- 0
Prior to the GFC there was talk of a BBI demerger where BBI would split into two entities, one being a pure-play transportation entity and the other being a pure-play energy transmission and distribution entity. I would be interested to hear the thoughts of others on this forum as to what they think the likelihood of such a demerger happening in the future is, assuming BBI survives its current difficulties.
From where I sit I can't imagine BBI demerging given its current situation where it is selling part if not whole interests in many of its better assets with acquisitions out of the question for the foreseeable future. What does everyone else think about this?
I would also be interested to hear whether any of you think BBI would be best served either going one way or the other i.e. Do you think it would be better for BBI to focus on one asset class instead of two?
So what happens to BEPPA in 2012 assuming BBI pays holders the $1.20?
Does BEPPA cease to exist?
I would not be surprised to see BBI hit $0.07 this week if the news of the port in WA is 100% correct. Good to see a positive amoungst all this doom and gloom
I would also be interested to hear whether any of you think BBI would be best served either going one way or the other i.e. Do you think it would be better for BBI to focus on one asset class instead of two?
BEPPA are outstanding value at less than a cent premium to BBI. I bought another 200K at 6c. Asset sales are the key. I see Xstrata is all cashed up now and looking for assets. DBCT would be a very good buy for Xstrata as a user of the port.
Interestingly not much movement in BBI considering the port news on friday??? What is your take on this?
I really hope you are right. Seeing a sea of green tomorrow would be awesome.
I think there is a good chance, but judging by BBI today, it was very slow to rise, which surprised me.
Is anyone willing to speculate on how the market would react to BBI SP if BBI were to sell the westnet rail link thing they own 100% of?
Would it be seen as a positive for providing liquidity to pay off debt, or a negative for getting rid of such a good asset with future potential?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?