- Joined
- 12 November 2007
- Posts
- 2,944
- Reactions
- 4
So am I right in thinking that under this deal beppa holders will get $0.06 cash and 9 BBI shares / Beppa share held.
If Beppa are being converted at $0.001 it's going to mean Beppa holders end up with Millions of shares even from small holdings.
If this new company does well, the Beppa holders should see some really good growth. By my rough calculations ( and they are very rough ) This deal could work out far better for Beppa Holders than $1 in 2012.
I would love to see some thoughts on the deal from hardyakka or BB.
at the moment I have 150,000 beppa, If they are converted at $0.001 it would mean I would have over 55,000,000 shares in the new Prime Infrastructure, every 0.001 upward movement means I would be earning $55,000. surly I am missing somthing here.
Remember they will be consolidated at 1:15,000 so your 55,000,000 BBI's will become 3,667 new BBI's.
Any idea what the value of the consolidated shares would be?, I am just after a ball park figure.
I am going to read all the docs over the week end, I tried last night, but my eyes got too heavy.
I am reading the prospectus again to understand how EPS holders are going to benefit from post restructure. If EPS holders make a big wind fall, they definitely take profit right after the shares open to trade. If that happens, one rather buys in the new BBI shares at market price which potentially lower than "IPO" price.
Are you saying if Beppa started trading again tomorow and you could get say 35c (with an implied value of 43c), you could sell, then wait for the SPP, and consolidation, then hopefully sp falls and you buy in with proceeds?
Is this report true??? Trading recommence on Monday,see last para.
Bid for bigger payout endangers BBI futureINFRASTRUCTURE DANNY JOHN AND JAMIE FREED
October 10, 2009
THE $1.8 billion move to secure the future of Babcock & Brown Infrastructure faces a threat from its hybrid security holders who believe they might receive a greater payout if the group goes into liquidation than through their entitlements under the recapitalisation plan.
With BBI's board saying that the group could be placed into administration if the refinancing proposal is voted down, the Australian noteholders are considering whether a rejection could produce a 27c-a-security better return than currently proposed.
An initial investigation of the plan by investors has indicated that while BBI will pay the noteholders a total of 43c a security, the liquidation of the old Alinta energy assets, over which the noteholders would have access, could produce 70c a security.
I'll be voting no to the recap, $0.04 is close to nothing. I would rather see BBI and the Management disappear, than to see them run off with my $$'s and start up again.
It wasn't with the banks in the end but the net results for unitholders is about the same.With regard to the directors objectives let's not forget that this was born in the Babcock and Brown stable of irrational exuberance. The directors will first of all look after their own pay packets and will hop into bed with the lenders at unitholder expense if necessary to keep their jobs.
One need look no further than Centro as an example of this. It's still alive but the banks are hoovering up all the cash flow and shareholders have been very heavily diluted. Babcock and Brown's directors also managed to keep their jobs as part of their formal administration IIRC.
With regard to the equity that BEPPA holders get I note that this is dependent on the level of SPARCS conversion. In coming up with $284m-$285m the directors have taken the most optimistic scenario (no SPARCS conversion).
Page 25 of the PDS notes that there are $NZ119m in outstanding SPARCS on issue (~$97m) so if all were converted the equity left for BEPPA holders would be $187m or about 10% of the recapitalised entity. The extent to which this is realisable will depend on the market price of the recapitalised BBI from Nov 24.
Correct. 43c value quoted by BBI directors is assuming NO SPARCS conversion. If SPARCS convert (and I think most will) then the implied value of BEPPA reduces to circa 25c and that also assumes that the market buys this BAM murder and is prepared to value the entire entity at 8.7X 2010 EBITDA. Lots of ifs and maybes before BEPPA actually see 43c in cash.
It is very dependant on final market prices.
BB, given that SPARCS has an oustanding $97 million and BEPPA has a face value of about $779 million how come there is such a massive reduction in BEPPA value (42c - 25c) if all SPARCS convert on 17 November 09??
The above calculations would only be right if SPARCS holders are being asked to take a haircut on their face value to the same extent as BEPPA.From the $288mil if all sparcs convert it would be split 97/(97+779)=11% to sparcs and 89% for beppa.
ie sparcs get 31.7mil (0.11*288) and Beppa 256.3mil(0.89*288). On a per share basis i would say Beppa got 256.3/779=33c + 6c div
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?